Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (1953)
Chris Benson <cbenson <at> adax.com>
2009-12-08 00:13:18 GMT
IMHO, the original text had one '(' AND one ')' too many.
The corrected text as shown in the NEXT email below
removes only the second of these extra parentheses.
The first one should also be removed. The Erratum
"corrected" Corrected Text should [IMHO] read:
Investment in equipment and facilities Capital Expenditure
(CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) should be minimized.
With thanks, from Chris Benson.
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:01:13 -0800 (PST)
>> From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org>
>> To: <benjamin.niven-jenkins <at> bt.com>, <dbrungard <at> att.com>,
>> <malcolm.betts <at> huawei.com>, <nurit.sprecher <at> nsn.com>,
>> <satoshi.ueno <at> ntt.com>, <rcallon <at> juniper.net>,
>> <adrian.farrel <at> huawei.com>, <swallow <at> cisco.com>, <loa <at> pi.nu>
>> Cc: <mpls <at> ietf.org>, <duzongpeng <at> gmail.com>, <rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org>
>> Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (1953)
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5654,
>> "Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile".