The IESG | 22 Apr 15:00 2014
Picon

Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05.txt> (Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE'
  <draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf <at> ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-05-06. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg <at> ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

   MPLS-TE advertises 32 administrative groups (commonly referred to as
   "colors" or "link colors") using the Administrative Group sub-TLV of
   the Link TLV.  This is defined for OSPFv2 (RFC3630), OSPFv3 (RFC5329)
   and ISIS (RFC5305).

   This document adds a sub-TLV to the IGP TE extensions, "Extended
   Administrative Group".  This sub-TLV provides for additional
   administrative groups (link colors) beyond the current limit of 32.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group/ballot/

No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 22 Apr 14:55 2014
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-05.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection
        Author          : Eric Osborne
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-05.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2014-04-22

Abstract:
   This document contains a number of updates to the Protection State
   Coordination (PSC) logic defined in RFC6378, "MPLS Transport Profile
   (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection".  These updates provide some rules and
   recommendations around the use of TLVs in PSC, address some issues
   raised in an ITU-T liaison statement, and clarify PSC's behavior in a
   case not well explained in RFC6378.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-05

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 22 Apr 14:31 2014
Picon

I-D Action: draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-02.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs
        Authors         : Tarek Saad
                          Rakesh Gandhi
                          Zafar Ali
                          Robert H. Venator
                          Yuji Kamite
	Filename        : draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-02.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2014-04-22

Abstract:
   This document defines Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic
   Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling extensions for reoptimizing loosely
   routed Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Traffic Engineered (TE) Label
   Switched Paths (LSPs) in an Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
   and/or Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-02

(Continue reading)

Eric Osborne | 21 Apr 22:20 2014

Addressing comments on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt

Folks-

  I have posted draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04.  It addresses the
gen-art comments as well as other feeback received on this list from
the v-03 last call.  I also shuffled things around so that the section
order made more sense.

  This draft elicited a comment and a warning from idnits.  I believe
they are both OK to disregard:

1)

  -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC6378, but the
     abstract doesn't seem to directly say this.  It does mention RFC6378
     though, so this could be OK.

It's pretty clear that the document updates rfc6378.

2)

  == Missing Reference: 'RFC-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04' is mentioned on line
     412, but not defined

This is a self-reference which needs to be updated with the RFC number
for this draft.

  I expect this to be good to go, but given the amount of reshuffling
and new text I'd like to give folks one more shot at tweaking the
language.

(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 21 Apr 22:20 2014
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection
        Author          : Eric Osborne
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2014-04-21

Abstract:
   This document contains a number of updates to the Protection State
   Coordination (PSC) logic defined in RFC6378, "MPLS Transport Profile
   (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection".  These updates provide some rules and
   recommendations around the use of TLVs in PSC, address some issues
   raised in an ITU-T liaision statement, and clarify

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 21 Apr 21:17 2014
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE
        Author          : Eric Osborne
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05.txt
	Pages           : 7
	Date            : 2014-04-21

Abstract:
   MPLS-TE advertises 32 administrative groups (commonly referred to as
   "colors" or "link colors") using the Administrative Group sub-TLV of
   the Link TLV.  This is defined for OSPFv2 (RFC3630), OSPFv3 (RFC5329)
   and ISIS (RFC5305).

   This document adds a sub-TLV to the IGP TE extensions, "Extended
   Administrative Group".  This sub-TLV provides for additional
   administrative groups (link colors) beyond the current limit of 32.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 17 Apr 16:37 2014
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6-only MPLS Networks
        Authors         : Wesley George
                          Carlos Pignataro
	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-00.txt
	Pages           : 24
	Date            : 2014-04-17

Abstract:
   This document reviews the MPLS protocol suite in the context of IPv6
   and identifies gaps that must be addressed in order to allow MPLS-
   related protocols and applications to be used with IPv6-only
   networks.  This document is not intended to highlight a particular
   vendor's implementation (or lack thereof) in the context of IPv6-only
   MPLS functionality, but rather to focus on gaps in the standards
   defining the MPLS suite.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-00

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
(Continue reading)

Loa Andersson | 17 Apr 10:04 2014
Picon

IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply

Working Group,

The authors of  draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply has informed us
that the draft is ready for working groups last call.

Before starting the working group last call we want to run an IPR poll.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to 
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are two IPR disclosures that relates to this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The 
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, Loa
(as MPLS WG co-chair)
--

-- 
(Continue reading)

Santosh Esale | 16 Apr 03:07 2014
Picon

FW: New Version Notification for draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session-00.txt

We have submitted a new draft - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session-00.txt
that describes application aware targeted ldp session. We would appreciate your feedback and any
comments on it.

Thanks,
Santosh

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts <at> ietf.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:57 PM
To: Raveendra Torvi; Santosh Esale; Chris Bowers; Santosh Esale; Chris Bowers; Raveendra Torvi
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Santosh Esale and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session
Revision:	00
Title:		Applications aware LDP Targeted Session
Document date:	2014-04-02
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		12
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-esale-mpls-appl-aware-ldp-targeted-session-00

Abstract:
   Recent Targeted LDP applications such as Remote LFA and BGP auto
   discovery FEC 129 pseudowire may automatically establish a targeted
(Continue reading)

RFC Errata System | 15 Apr 11:31 2014

[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6371 (3963)

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6371, "Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based Transport
Networks". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6371&eid=3963

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Liu Lin <bestman0729 <at> gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2014-04-15
Held by: Adrian Farrel (IESG)

Section: 7.1.2

Original Text
-------------
The peer MEP, upon receiving an LKI removal request, can either
   accept or reject the removal instruction and replies with an LK
   removal reply OAM packet indicating whether or not it has accepted
   the instruction.

Corrected Text
--------------
The peer MEP, upon receiving an LKI removal request, can either
   accept or reject the removal instruction and replies with an LKI
   removal reply OAM packet indicating whether or not it has accepted
(Continue reading)

RFC Errata System | 15 Apr 10:54 2014

[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6371 (3963)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6371,
"Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based Transport Networks".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6371&eid=3963

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Liu Lin <bestman0729 <at> gmail.com>

Section: 7.1.2

Original Text
-------------
The peer MEP, upon receiving an LKI removal request, can either
   accept or reject the removal instruction and replies with an LK
   removal reply OAM packet indicating whether or not it has accepted
   the instruction.

Corrected Text
--------------
The peer MEP, upon receiving an LKI removal request, can either
   accept or reject the removal instruction and replies with an LKI
   removal reply OAM packet indicating whether or not it has accepted
   the instruction.

Notes
-----
LK  ---> LKI
(Continue reading)


Gmane