headers
Cristina Pascual | 1 Jun 2011 03:10
Picon

Last Mile, June 5th | CfP: VALID 2011 || October 23-28, 2011 - Barcelona, Spain


INVITATION:

=================
Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the following opportunity to
submit and publish original scientific results.
The submission deadline is June 5, 2011
In addition, authors of selected papers will be invited to submit extended article versions to one of the
IARIA Journals: http://www.iariajournals.org
=================

============== VALID 2011 | Call for Papers ===============

CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS

VALID 2011: The Third International Conference on Advances in System Testing and Validation Lifecycle

October 23-28, 2011 - Barcelona, Spain

General page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/VALID11.html

Call for Papers: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/CfPVALID11.html

- regular papers
- short papers (work in progress)
- posters

Submission page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/SubmitVALID11.html

Submission deadline: June 5th, 2011
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Cristina Pascual | 1 Jun 2011 03:34
Picon

Last Mile, June 5th | CfP: SIMUL 2011 || October 23-28, 2011 - Barcelona, Spain


INVITATION:

=================
Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the following opportunity to
submit and publish original scientific results.
The submission deadline is June 5, 2011.
In addition, authors of selected papers will be invited to submit extended article versions to one of the
IARIA Journals: http://www.iariajournals.org
=================

============== SIMUL 2011 | Call for Papers ===============

CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS

SIMUL 2011: The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation
October 23-28, 2011 - Barcelona, Spain

General page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/SIMUL11.html

Call for Papers: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/CfPSIMUL11.html

- regular papers
- short papers (work in progress)
- posters

Submission page: http://www.iaria.org/conferences2011/SubmitSIMUL11.html

Submission deadline: June 5th, 2011
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ali C. Begen (abegen | 13 Jun 2011 00:15
Picon
Favicon

Revised redundancy grouping semantics drafts

Hi everyone,

We revised the following two drafts:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-mmusic-redundancy-grouping/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-mmusic-temporal-interleaving/ 

Drafts are almost complete for your review. Problems regarding RTCP reporting have been addressed. I will
be forwarding this email to AVTCORE as well as there was a request that AVTCORE also reviewed these drafts.

Thanks.
-acbegen
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Miguel A. Garcia | 15 Jun 2011 15:32
Picon
Favicon

Re: Reviewing draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap

A quick review of Section 5 of this document:

- I think it is a good idea to clearly indicate which SDP attributes are 
newly created and which ones are reused from other RFCs. I therefore 
recommend to add the following sentences somewhere to the corresponding 
sections:

5.3:
RFC 4145 [RFC4145] defines the "setup" attribute whose purpose is to 
indcate which of the end points should initiate the connection 
establishment. This document reuses the "setup" attribute to similarly 
indicate which end point initiates the DCCP-UDP connection establishment.

5.4:
RFC 5245 [RFC5245] defines the "candidate" attribute whose purpose is to 
provide one of many possible candidate addresses for communication. This 
document reuses the "candidate" attribute to indicate native or 
encapsulated candidate addresses

- In 5.2 last paragraph, I am missing some normative statements, for example:

If RTCP is multiplexed with RTP, endpoints MUST encode the DCCP port used 
for RTCP in the "rtcp" attribute specified in RFC 3605 [RFC3605]. An SDP 
offerer MAY indicate its willingnes to multiplex RTP and RTCP onto a 
single DCCP port by adding an "rtcp-mux" attribute as specified in RFC 
5761 [RFC5761]. If the answer also includes the "rtcp-mux" attribute (as 
per RFC 5761 [RFC5761]), then RTP and RTCP are multiplexed onto a single 
DCCP port, otherwise separate DCCP ports are used for RTP and RTCP.  In 
each case, only a single UDP port is used for the DCCP-UDP encapsulation.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Miguel A. Garcia | 16 Jun 2011 08:09
Picon
Favicon

Unofficial WGLC for draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration-07.txt

This is to start a 4-week unofficial WGLC of the IANA registration of the 
image media type in SDP,

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration/

This document is going to proceed through the individually submitted, 
AD-sponsored track. However, the draft came as a requirements of the 
MMUSIC WG, has been substantially reviewed in MMUSIC, therefore the 
chairs want to have a last review in the format of an unofficial WGLC.

Please review the draft, and send comments to the authors and the list. 
Even if you don't have comments because you are happy with the current 
document, please say so.

The deadline for receiving comments is July 14th.

/Miguel and Flemming
--

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Miguel A. Garcia | 16 Jun 2011 10:28
Picon
Favicon

Re: [dccp] Reviewing draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap

Hi Gorry:

Your suggestions look ok to me.

BR,

        Miguel

On 16/06/2011 9:42, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>
> See in-line on dccp-service-code.
>
> Gorry
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
>
>> A quick review of Section 5 of this document:
>>
>> - I think it is a good idea to clearly indicate which SDP attributes are
>> newly created and which ones are reused from other RFCs. I therefore
>> recommend to add the following sentences somewhere to the corresponding
>> sections:
>>
>> 5.3:
>> RFC 4145 [RFC4145] defines the "setup" attribute whose purpose is to indcate
>> which of the end points should initiate the connection establishment. This
>> document reuses the "setup" attribute to similarly indicate which end point
>> initiates the DCCP-UDP connection establishment.
>>
>> 5.4:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kevin P. Fleming | 16 Jun 2011 17:10
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Unofficial WGLC for draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration-07.txt

On 06/16/2011 01:09 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
> This is to start a 4-week unofficial WGLC of the IANA registration of
> the image media type in SDP,
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration/
>
>
> This document is going to proceed through the individually submitted,
> AD-sponsored track. However, the draft came as a requirements of the
> MMUSIC WG, has been substantially reviewed in MMUSIC, therefore the
> chairs want to have a last review in the format of an unofficial WGLC.
>
> Please review the draft, and send comments to the authors and the list.
> Even if you don't have comments because you are happy with the current
> document, please say so.

I have already reviewed this document and am satisfied it should proceed 
through the process.

--

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming <at> digium.com | SIP: kpfleming <at> digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bert Greevenbosch | 17 Jun 2011 03:58
Favicon

Re: Unofficial WGLC for draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration-07.txt

I have reviewed the document and am happy with the current version.

Best regards,
Bert

-----Original Message-----
From: mmusic-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Miguel A. Garcia
Sent: 16 June 2011 14:10
To: mmusic
Cc: Flemming Andreasen
Subject: [MMUSIC] Unofficial WGLC for draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration-07.txt

This is to start a 4-week unofficial WGLC of the IANA registration of the 
image media type in SDP,

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration/

This document is going to proceed through the individually submitted, 
AD-sponsored track. However, the draft came as a requirements of the 
MMUSIC WG, has been substantially reviewed in MMUSIC, therefore the 
chairs want to have a last review in the format of an unofficial WGLC.

Please review the draft, and send comments to the authors and the list. 
Even if you don't have comments because you are happy with the current 
document, please say so.

The deadline for receiving comments is July 14th.

/Miguel and Flemming
--

--
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bert Greevenbosch | 17 Jun 2011 04:31
Favicon

Intention of asking for WG adoption of the 3D drafts in Quebec

Hello all,

 

Some time ago, I have uploaded two new versions of the 3D drafts:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-greevenbosch-mmusic-parallax-attribute/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-greevenbosch-mmusic-signal-3d-format/

 

It is my intention to ask for WG adoption of the drafts in Quebec.

 

A brief summary of the changes in the v01s:

 

draft-greevenbosch-mmusic-parallax-attribute:

The unit of the "ParallaxInfo" attribute value has been normalised to "pixels on a screen with a width of 11520 pixels".

This allows adjusting the parallax for various screen sizes, often by dividing through an integer number.

 

draft-greevenbosch-mmusic-signal-3d-format:

Added two sections for the SDP offer/answer model. Section 7 considers behaviour for the compliant device, whereas section 8 considers backward compatibility with a legacy device.

For backwards compatibility with legacy devices, generally the system will fall back to 2D streaming. This sometimes requires re-negotiation.

 

I look forward to your comments and (continued) support!

 

Best regards,

Bert

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Miguel A. Garcia | 27 Jun 2011 12:31
Picon
Favicon

MMUSIC session at IETF 81

Hi:

We just got an e-mail from the IETF secretariat indicating our schedule 
for IETF 81. There is something weird, because the chairs asked for a 2.5 
hours time slot, but we've got a 1.5 hours (in spite the e-mail from the 
IETF secretariat says 2.5). We are trying to clarify this issue.

The fact is that we are schedule for Tuesday 1520-1700:

MMUSIC Session 1 (2.5 hours)
Tuesday, Afternoon Session II 1520-1700
Room Name: 204 B

        Miguel

--

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane