Media Gateway Control (megaco)

Javi | 29 Jan 2011 02:13

TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP

Assuming the next situation:

ISDN Terminal 1  -   MG1 -  [IP network] -  MG2   -   ISDN Terminal 2

where the MGs (Media Gateway) are controlled by a MGC (Media Gateway 
Controller) via MeGaCo[H.248.1].

[ITU-T Y.2262 / Annex IV] proposses that MGs may transport ISDN 
B-channels over the IP network:

+ By a single RTP session (when monochannels ISDN services)

+ Or by TDMoIP (= UDP TDMPWs), when multichannels ISDN services.

How may MGC indicate to the MG that it uses PWs at the IP termination?

It may be done by MeGaCo, using SDP[RFC4566] at Local/Remote 
descriptors. However, how may be that SDP description of TDMPWs?

Thanks,

Javier Muñoz

headers

Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht | 31 Jan 2011 09:03

Re: TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP

Note: the referred text relates to an Appendix ( = informativ), not to an Annex (= normativ). Thus, just examples, not mandatory.

Replies:
there are H.248 profile specifications with support support of monorate emulation, see e.g.

ETSI ES 283 024, Trunking Gateway
5.15.1.4 Clearmode codec
On IMS/NGN Terminations, Clearmode codec is transported according to RFC 4040 [15].
When the MGC determines that a 64 kbit/s unrestricted bearer service is requested, the clearmode codec shall be used. A Dynamic Payload type with CLEARMODE as encoding name shall be included in both the local and remote descriptor.
The behaviour of the TMGW shall then conform to RFC 4040 [15]. All voice and signal processing functions such as silence suppression, comfort noise insertion and gain adjustment shall be automatically turned off. The MG shall inherit the same QoS objectives as the ISDN bearer service.

However, there was never any H.248 Profile standardized with multirate support, at least to my knowledge.

(I'm aware of vendor specific profile, but that are proprietary solutions.)

-Albrecht

__
Y.2262 PSTN/ISDN emulation and simulation, Appendix IV
Examples of emulation of PSTN and N-ISDN bearer services
(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation)

Examples for the emulation of PSTN and N-ISDN bearer services are provided:

1) Monorate bearer services (= 1 × 64-kbit/s digital bearer in PSTN/ISDN)
• ITU-T Recommendations I.231.2 and I.231.3 may be emulated by a single RTP
session, with or without RTP control protocol (RTCP), using an RTP profile according
to IETF RFC 3551.
• ITU-T Recommendation I.231.1 may be emulated by a single RTP session, with or
without RTCP, using RTP clearmode according to IETF RFC 4040.

2) Multirate bearer services (= N × 64-kbit/s digital bearer in PSTN/ISDN; N greater than one)
• ITU-T Recommendations I.231.4 to I.231.10 may be emulated by TDMoIP described
in ITU-T Recommendation Y.1453.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: megaco-bounces <at> ietf.org
> [mailto:megaco-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Javi
> Sent: Samstag, 29. Januar 2011 02:13
> To: megaco <at> ietf.org
> Subject: [Megaco] TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP
>
> Assuming the next situation:
>
> ISDN Terminal 1 - MG1 - [IP network] - MG2 - ISDN Terminal 2
>
> where the MGs (Media Gateway) are controlled by a MGC (Media Gateway
> Controller) via MeGaCo[H.248.1].
>
> [ITU-T Y.2262 / Annex IV] proposses that MGs may transport
> ISDN B-channels over the IP network:
>
> + By a single RTP session (when monochannels ISDN services)
>
> + Or by TDMoIP (= UDP TDMPWs), when multichannels ISDN services.
>
>
> How may MGC indicate to the MG that it uses PWs at the IP termination?
>
> It may be done by MeGaCo, using SDP[RFC4566] at Local/Remote
> descriptors. However, how may be that SDP description of TDMPWs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Javier Muñoz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> Megaco <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
Megaco <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

headers

Javi | 31 Jan 2011 11:47

Re: TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP

I agree, TDMoIP is an option only.

But, if it is used, MGC would use SDP at Local/Remote MeGaCo descriptors. How may be that SDP description for TDMoIP?

However, there was never any H.248 Profile standardized with multirate support, at least to my knowledge.

(I'm aware of vendor specific profile, but that are proprietary solutions.)

I would be interested to know any of that proprietary solutions. May you indicate me any?

__
Y.2262 PSTN/ISDN emulation and simulation, Appendix IV
Examples of emulation of PSTN and N-ISDN bearer services
(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation)

Examples for the emulation of PSTN and N-ISDN bearer services are provided:

1) Monorate bearer services (= 1 × 64-kbit/s digital bearer in PSTN/ISDN)
• ITU-T Recommendations I.231.2 and I.231.3 may be emulated by a single RTP
session, with or without RTP control protocol (RTCP), using an RTP profile according
to IETF RFC 3551.
• ITU-T Recommendation I.231.1 may be emulated by a single RTP session, with or
without RTCP, using RTP clearmode according to IETF RFC 4040.

2) Multirate bearer services (= N × 64-kbit/s digital bearer in PSTN/ISDN; N greater than one)
• ITU-T Recommendations I.231.4 to I.231.10 may be emulated by TDMoIP described
in ITU-T Recommendation Y.1453.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: megaco-bounces <at> ietf.org
> [mailto:megaco-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Javi
> Sent: Samstag, 29. Januar 2011 02:13
> To: megaco <at> ietf.org
> Subject: [Megaco] TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP
>
> Assuming the next situation:
>
> ISDN Terminal 1 - MG1 - [IP network] - MG2 - ISDN Terminal 2
>
> where the MGs (Media Gateway) are controlled by a MGC (Media Gateway
> Controller) via MeGaCo[H.248.1].
>
> [ITU-T Y.2262 / Annex IV] proposses that MGs may transport
> ISDN B-channels over the IP network:
>
> + By a single RTP session (when monochannels ISDN services)
>
> + Or by TDMoIP (= UDP TDMPWs), when multichannels ISDN services.
>
>
> How may MGC indicate to the MG that it uses PWs at the IP termination?
>
> It may be done by MeGaCo, using SDP[RFC4566] at Local/Remote
> descriptors. However, how may be that SDP description of TDMPWs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Javier Muñoz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> Megaco <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
Megaco <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

headers

Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht | 31 Jan 2011 16:54

Re: TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP

Just some high-level indications:

Multirate means effectively N-out-of-K (with K = 24 or 30 dependent on ANSI /ETSI markets; and 1 < N <= K).

That's a first requirement.

Secondly, the selection of channels may be random, they must not be in consecutive order (e.g., think about the permutations for N = 5).

Thirdly, there could be a dependency of the choosen CESoIP emulation service to the H.248 connection model.

Possible solution: H.248 MUX termination ... at the high-level ...

From: Javi [mailto:javi <at> trajano.us.es]
Sent: Montag, 31. Januar 2011 11:47
To: megaco <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Megaco] TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP

I agree, TDMoIP is an option only.

But, if it is used, MGC would use SDP at Local/Remote MeGaCo descriptors. How may be that SDP description for TDMoIP?

However, there was never any H.248 Profile standardized with multirate support, at least to my knowledge.

(I'm aware of vendor specific profile, but that are proprietary solutions.)

I would be interested to know any of that proprietary solutions. May you indicate me any?

__
Y.2262 PSTN/ISDN emulation and simulation, Appendix IV
Examples of emulation of PSTN and N-ISDN bearer services
(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation)

Examples for the emulation of PSTN and N-ISDN bearer services are provided:

1) Monorate bearer services (= 1 × 64-kbit/s digital bearer in PSTN/ISDN)
• ITU-T Recommendations I.231.2 and I.231.3 may be emulated by a single RTP
session, with or without RTP control protocol (RTCP), using an RTP profile according
to IETF RFC 3551.
• ITU-T Recommendation I.231.1 may be emulated by a single RTP session, with or
without RTCP, using RTP clearmode according to IETF RFC 4040.

2) Multirate bearer services (= N × 64-kbit/s digital bearer in PSTN/ISDN; N greater than one)
• ITU-T Recommendations I.231.4 to I.231.10 may be emulated by TDMoIP described
in ITU-T Recommendation Y.1453.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: megaco-bounces <at> ietf.org
> [mailto:megaco-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Javi
> Sent: Samstag, 29. Januar 2011 02:13
> To: megaco <at> ietf.org
> Subject: [Megaco] TDMPW and MeGaCo/SDP
>
> Assuming the next situation:
>
> ISDN Terminal 1 - MG1 - [IP network] - MG2 - ISDN Terminal 2
>
> where the MGs (Media Gateway) are controlled by a MGC (Media Gateway
> Controller) via MeGaCo[H.248.1].
>
> [ITU-T Y.2262 / Annex IV] proposses that MGs may transport
> ISDN B-channels over the IP network:
>
> + By a single RTP session (when monochannels ISDN services)
>
> + Or by TDMoIP (= UDP TDMPWs), when multichannels ISDN services.
>
>
> How may MGC indicate to the MG that it uses PWs at the IP termination?
>
> It may be done by MeGaCo, using SDP[RFC4566] at Local/Remote
> descriptors. However, how may be that SDP description of TDMPWs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Javier Muñoz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> Megaco <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
Megaco <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

3	April 2013
10	March 2013
1	February 2013
1	January 2013
3	December 2012
2	October 2012
4	September 2012
13	August 2012
3	July 2012
3	June 2012
3	May 2012
3	March 2012
9	February 2012
7	January 2012
45	December 2011
23	November 2011
21	October 2011
1	September 2011
3	August 2011
11	July 2011
4	June 2011
13	May 2011
6	April 2011
2	March 2011
13	February 2011
4	January 2011
7	December 2010
4	November 2010
6	October 2010
5	August 2010
15	July 2010
14	June 2010
1	May 2010
9	March 2010
22	February 2010
1	January 2010
20	December 2009
6	November 2009
14	October 2009
28	September 2009
17	August 2009
13	July 2009
19	June 2009
32	May 2009
7	April 2009
3	March 2009
12	February 2009
6	January 2009
9	December 2008
15	November 2008
10	October 2008
30	September 2008
21	August 2008
19	July 2008
17	June 2008
24	May 2008
23	April 2008
31	March 2008
38	February 2008
73	January 2008
73	December 2007
16	November 2007
49	October 2007
35	September 2007
38	August 2007
42	July 2007
65	June 2007
45	May 2007
69	April 2007
50	March 2007
61	February 2007
66	January 2007
37	December 2006
41	November 2006
38	October 2006
32	September 2006
60	August 2006
94	July 2006
25	June 2006
76	May 2006
40	April 2006
61	March 2006
94	February 2006
65	January 2006
63	December 2005
86	November 2005
65	October 2005
101	September 2005
73	August 2005
82	July 2005
133	June 2005
50	May 2005
84	April 2005
49	March 2005
40	February 2005
49	January 2005
55	December 2004
77	November 2004
31	October 2004
43	September 2004
51	August 2004
38	July 2004
51	June 2004
42	May 2004
60	April 2004
85	March 2004
61	February 2004
113	January 2004
94	December 2003
87	November 2003
58	October 2003
75	September 2003
44	August 2003
36	July 2003
82	June 2003
68	May 2003
104	April 2003
89	March 2003
58	February 2003
119	January 2003
57	December 2002
106	November 2002
191	October 2002
145	September 2002
153	August 2002
283	July 2002
169	June 2002
300	May 2002
217	April 2002

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

					1	2
3	4	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14	15	16
17	18	19	20	21	22	23
24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31