headers
Ronald Bonica | 1 Feb 2012 17:00
Favicon

draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Guys,

It appears that we have consensus to adopt draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item.
Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would be appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?

--------------------------
Ron Bonica
vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 16 comments |
headers
Tina TSOU | 2 Feb 2012 00:29
Favicon

draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview-01 uploaded

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview/

Filename:	 draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview
Revision:	 01
Title:		 Multicast Transition Overview
Creation date:	 2012-02-02
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 10

Abstract:
   The transition from IPv4 to IPv6 raises issues for multicast
   signaling and multicast content distribution.  This memo describes
   the problem and briefly surveys the solution space.

It's updated based on comments from mailing list, authors, contributors and the AD.

Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
xiaohong.deng | 3 Feb 2012 07:51

Adoption of draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Support for the adoption of this document.

 

FYI.  We have implemented this document and source code is open sourced now and available via http://sourceforge.net/projects/mb4/

 

Cheers,

Xiaohong

 

There has been some discussion about draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format on the list recently. We'd like to see if there is support from the WG to adopt this as an Mboned document. Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this draft as a WG document.

 

The latest version can be found here:

 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format-00

 

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
mohamed.boucadair | 3 Feb 2012 09:46

Re: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Dear Ron, all,

IMHO, the document is stable. I vote for issuing a WG LC just after publishing the -00 of the WG adopted version.

Cheers,
Med 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org] 
> De la part de Ronald Bonica
> Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 17:01
> À : MBONED WG
> Objet : [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
> 
> Guys,
> 
> It appears that we have consensus to adopt 
> draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item. 
> Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would 
> be appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> Ron Bonica
> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> 
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 15 comments |
headers
christian.jacquenet | 3 Feb 2012 09:47

Re: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Hi*,

I agree with Med.

Cheers,

Christian. 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org] De la part de mohamed.boucadair <at> orange.com
Envoyé : vendredi 3 février 2012 09:47
À : Ronald Bonica; MBONED WG
Objet : Re: [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Dear Ron, all,

IMHO, the document is stable. I vote for issuing a WG LC just after publishing the -00 of the WG adopted version.

Cheers,
Med 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org] De la 
> part de Ronald Bonica Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 17:01 À : 
> MBONED WG Objet : [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
> 
> Guys,
> 
> It appears that we have consensus to adopt 
> draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item.
> Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would be 
> appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> Ron Bonica
> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> 
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne
doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur,
veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant
susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be
protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorization.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange shall not be liable if this message was modified, changed
or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
xiaohong.deng | 3 Feb 2012 09:50

Re: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

+1.

Cheers,
Xiaohong

-----Original Message-----
From: mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of christian.jacquenet <at> orange.com
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 4:48 PM
To: BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC-NAD-TIP; RonaldBonica; MBONED WG
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Hi*,

I agree with Med.

Cheers,

Christian. 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org] De la part de mohamed.boucadair <at> orange.com
Envoyé : vendredi 3 février 2012 09:47
À : Ronald Bonica; MBONED WG
Objet : Re: [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Dear Ron, all,

IMHO, the document is stable. I vote for issuing a WG LC just after publishing the -00 of the WG adopted version.

Cheers,
Med 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org] De la 
> part de Ronald Bonica Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 17:01 À : 
> MBONED WG Objet : [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
> 
> Guys,
> 
> It appears that we have consensus to adopt 
> draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item.
> Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would be 
> appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> Ron Bonica
> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> 
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne
doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur,
veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant
susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be
protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorization.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange shall not be liable if this message was modified, changed
or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ronald Bonica | 3 Feb 2012 16:51
Favicon

Re: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

Med,

This is a call for the chairs to make. What say you, chairs?

                                     Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mohamed.boucadair <at> orange.com
> [mailto:mohamed.boucadair <at> orange.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:47 AM
> To: Ronald Bonica; MBONED WG
> Subject: RE: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
> 
> Dear Ron, all,
> 
> IMHO, the document is stable. I vote for issuing a WG LC just after
> publishing the -00 of the WG adopted version.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org]
> > De la part de Ronald Bonica
> > Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 17:01
> > À : MBONED WG
> > Objet : [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > It appears that we have consensus to adopt
> > draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item.
> > Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would
> > be appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Ron Bonica
> > vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MBONED mailing list
> > MBONED <at> ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> >
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Stig Venaas | 3 Feb 2012 19:14

Re: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

On 2/3/2012 12:46 AM, mohamed.boucadair <at> orange.com wrote:
> Dear Ron, all,
>
> IMHO, the document is stable. I vote for issuing a WG LC just after publishing the -00 of the WG adopted version.

In the document we state:

    The format of the MPREFIX64 should be compatible with what is
    specified in [RFC3306] and [RFC3956] if corresponding mechanisms are
    used.

I wonder if it is worth explaining this in a little more detail?
Both of those mechanisms have some reserved bits after the scope,
which now will be redefined. Basically the first of the reserved
bits will now have a meaning, while the rest according to this
document MUST be 0, which is inline with their previous reserved
status.

Should there be an example in the document?

Stig

> Cheers,
> Med
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces <at> ietf.org]
>> De la part de Ronald Bonica
>> Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 17:01
>> À : MBONED WG
>> Objet : [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> It appears that we have consensus to adopt
>> draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item.
>> Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would
>> be appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Ron Bonica
>> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MBONED mailing list
>> MBONED <at> ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Stig Venaas | 3 Feb 2012 20:17

When to do the mboned interim?

Hi

I guess it is time to decide when to do the interim. Have this
been discussed already?

Perhaps about 2-3 weeks from now? That would give us more time
to prepare, but also leave room for working on documents
between the meeting and the IETF submission-deadline.

Stig
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Ronald Bonica | 3 Feb 2012 20:40
Favicon

Re: When to do the mboned interim?

Hi Stig,

The purpose of the interim meeting  is to discuss the overview document. I would like to see some revisions to
that document, but neither Tina nor I will be available to work on it until the week of the 12th. So we can
assume that a new version will be available around the 19th.

The WG chair, armed with that information, can schedule the interim accordingly.

BTW, since this meeting is to be held in cyberspace, we will be looking for somebody to donate
webex/gotomeeting/whatever facilities.

                                           Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stig Venaas [mailto:stig <at> venaas.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:17 PM
> To: mboned <at> ietf.org; Ronald Bonica
> Subject: When to do the mboned interim?
> 
> Hi
> 
> I guess it is time to decide when to do the interim. Have this
> been discussed already?
> 
> Perhaps about 2-3 weeks from now? That would give us more time
> to prepare, but also leave room for working on documents
> between the meeting and the IETF submission-deadline.
> 
> Stig
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane