Re: mboned: Please comment (in the event you didn't see this)
David Meyer <dmm <at> cisco.com>
2004-01-08 15:47:37 GMT
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:44:14AM -0800, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:31:58AM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:41:43AM -0800, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> > >> While MSDP MIB and rfc3171 are IPv4 only,
>> > (i). RFC 3307 (Allocation Guidelines for IPv6
>> > Multicast Addresses), is the analog to 3171 for
>> > IPv6. However, as you know it's a completely
>> > different problem.
>> Right, eg: the two new work items MSDP MIB and rfc3171 nly
>> apply to IPv4 and the proposed WG work item text is ok and non-confusing.
>> > (ii). The goal/milestone corresponding to what we were
>> > calling, for lack of a better name, IMDOC, is
>> > - Develop a roadmap informational RFC that
>> > describes the current IETF multicast
>> > architecture, including references to the
>> > relevent IETF documents and guidance for
>> > implementers and network operators along the
>> > line of RFC 1122/1123.
>> > Scott helped me craft this goal/milestone
>> > language, and the reference to 1123/1123 didn't
>> > imply IPv4 or IPv6. Its just a reference. Scott,
>> > do we need to rev this to call out v6 (since
>> > neither is mentioned, I assumed it would be clear
>> > that it was both)?