Re: NVO3 Multicast Framework
Dino Farinacci <farinacci <at> gmail.com>
2016-05-24 17:20:50 GMT
Sorry, I thought I had. NVo3, see my comments below.
> On May 24, 2016, at 6:14 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci <at> nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi Dino
> Could you copy NVO3 on your comments, please?
> From: EXT Dino Farinacci <farinacci <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, 16 May 2016 at 23:31
> To: Leonard Giuliano <lenny <at> juniper.net>
> Cc: MBONED WG <mboned <at> ietf.org>, Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci <at> alcatel-lucent.com>, Benson
Schliesser <bensons <at> queuefull.net>
> Subject: Re: [MBONED] NVO3 Multicast Framework
> I just have one minor comment. Regarding the second paragraph:
> Using LISP-signal-free does not mean the head-end must do replication. The draft indicates that a
mapping system is used to decide where packets go. If the mapping database indicates that packets are
encapsulated to multicast RLOCs, or unicast RLOCs, or both in one set, so be it.
> And note if there is a single multicast RLOC, then there is no replication happening at the head-end, just
one packet encapsulting multicast in multicast.
> So what is written above is true, but it may be associated with an incorrect section title.
>> On May 12, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Leonard Giuliano <lenny <at> juniper.net> wrote:
>> The following draft recently went through WG last call in the NVO3 working group:
>> This doc covers multicast in data center overlay networks. As you know, it is part of our charter in MBONED
to provide feedback to other relevant working groups. Please review and send any comments to the NVO3 WG
mailing list (nvo3 <at> ietf.org)- all comments will be greatly appreciated by NVO3.
>> MBONED mailing list
>> MBONED <at> ietf.org
MBONED mailing list
MBONED <at> ietf.org