Re: Query on querier version in IGMPv3
Kunal Shah <kunal.shah <at> ericsson.com>
2010-07-19 21:57:52 GMT
Hi Bharat,
Well, if the administrator has manually configured the interface to a lower version then s/he should make
the call to reconfigure to a higher version after a determination that a lower version on the interface is
not required.
Kunal
-----Original Message-----
From: magma-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:magma-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bharat Joshi
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:41 AM
To: Indranil Bhattacharya
Cc: magma <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] Query on querier version in IGMPv3
Indranil,
Thanks for your reply.
For the reselection part, using a timer will take care of the issue, you are suggesting could be there. The
lower_version_querier timeout will be twice the query-interval + robustness count, which will make
sure that timer fires only when the lowest version querier does not send any query message for such a time. (
Now someone can argue that query-interval for the lower version querier might be huge and it may not send
any query during this period. I think this is a mis-configuration and this can result in other issue. Also
the same issue exist in querier election as well. So we should not worry about this at all. )
For the administrative part, I agree that a router which is configured with V3 has to be configured
administratively to process V2/V1 queries. Basically an administrator is suggesting that a particular
interface may have old version querier and if that happens, lower our own version of queries in that
interface. But I am still not sure how to bring it back to the old higher version?
Regards,
Bharat
________________________________________
From: Indranil Bhattacharya [myselfindranil <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:51 PM
To: Bharat Joshi
Cc: magma <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [magma] Query on querier version in IGMPv3
Hi Bharat,
The first part is applicable to a router which has v3 but has been configured as v2.
The 'reselection' part was an answer for when the router should revert back to the configured higher query
version. This will be done when transmitting general query. After that if it receives v2/v1 query then it
will lower the version again. Even if you take the new timer approach, problem is that how do you control
sequence of queries from routers? Say, after timer expiry version is changed and v3 GQ is sent. V2
non-querier does not understand v3 query so it sends v2 GQ.
Section 7.3.1 says that it is an administrative responsibility. Excerpt is given below:
"If any older versions of IGMP are present on routers, the querier
MUST use the lowest version of IGMP present on the network. This
must be administratively assured; routers that desire to be
compatible with IGMPv1 and IGMPv2 MUST have a configuration option
to act in IGMPv1 or IGMPv2 compatibility modes."
Thanks,
Indranil
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bharat Joshi
<bharat_joshi <at> infosys.com<mailto:bharat_joshi <at> infosys.com>> wrote:
Indranil,
Ok. But RFC 3376 clearly says that a router should lower its version to the lowest version of query heard on a network.
One thing I did not get in your reply is 'Let the v2 updates's it querier timer from v3 query...'. While second
part of this statement is clear, I am not sure about the first part. A version 2 querier may/may not support
V3 so things won't work any way and there will be multiple number of queries on network which may not be desirable.
Another thing I did not understand is the last sentence. What do you mean by 'reselection can happen after
every general query'? I think RFC 3376 suggested this to avoid multiple queries on a network. If a router do
what is suggested in RFC 3376, at least there will be only one query in the network.
I checked couple of open-source implementation and it seems none of them store this information and always
use the highest configured version to send out an IGMP query. Not sure if there was any specific reason for
not doing this.
Regards,
Bharat
________________________________________
From: Indranil Bhattacharya [myselfindranil <at> gmail.com<mailto:myselfindranil <at> gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 1:43 PM
To: Bharat Joshi
Cc: magma <at> ietf.org<mailto:magma <at> ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [magma] Query on querier version in IGMPv3
Hi Bharat,
Do not lower the querier version. Let the v2 updates's it querier timer from v3 query or let it use it's
configured query interval. Otherwise, the reselection can happen after every General query.
Thanks,
Indranil
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bharat Joshi
<bharat_joshi <at> infosys.com<mailto:bharat_joshi <at> infosys.com><mailto:bharat_joshi <at> infosys.com<mailto:bharat_joshi <at> infosys.com>>> wrote:
Hi All,
I was re-reading RFC 3376 for handling compatibility for lower version of querier.
In section 7.3.1, it is mentioned that a querier configured to run in V3 mode
should lower its version when it sees a lower version query on the same
network. From that time onwards, a router should send the lower version
queries.
Now the question is, when this router should revert back to its configured higher
version? The text in section 7.3.1 or elsewhere does not talk about this.
Should a timer 'lower_version_querier' be started and updated as and when lower
version queries are removed? Please note this is not same as other-querier-present
timer.
Can someone, who has implemented IGMPv3, let me know how this particular case
has been handled in their implementation?
Regards,
Bharat
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to
copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are
unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize
this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should
carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to
monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address.
Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** _______________________________________________
magma mailing list
magma <at> ietf.org<mailto:magma <at> ietf.org><mailto:magma <at> ietf.org<mailto:magma <at> ietf.org>>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
_______________________________________________
magma mailing list
magma <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma