Re: RFC 3282: should we revise it?
2009-08-05 05:23:06 GMT
Hi - As a technical contributor (returning from two blissful weeks without email) ... > From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison <at> amazon.com> > To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru <at> ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:34 AM > Subject: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it? > > The one bit of language tagging infrastructure that we have not revised > since this whole body of work has started is RFC 3282, which defines > Content-Language and Accept-Language. That was outside the scope for which ltru was originally chartered. > This morning I had cause to want to reference it, but a desire not to > (since it depends on 3066 rather than the current-and-future BCP 47). > I'm pretty sure that the whole machinery of a WG is not needed to > revise this document--I'm thinking it would make a suitable individual > submission. I agree. > But I thought I'd mention it here to see if anyone had thoughts about > whether it were necessary, whether this list would make a suitable > place to solicit comments, (As co-chair) This seems reasonable for now. If it turns out to require significant discussion, or if a better WG "home" appears, we can redirect the discussion at that time.(Continue reading)