Sean Leonard | 10 Sep 22:28 2014

New Version Notification for draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-00.txt

Hello old ldapbis list:

Looks like this place is deserted...nevertheless, I wanted to inform 
list members of this proposal to add definitions to the IANA registry. 
These are based on PKCS #9, which predates ldapbis. However, the 
definitions in PKCS #9 never got added. So, this document adds them.

Feedback is requested, as well as suggestions on how best to proceed 
with this to get IETF consensus.

Thanks,

Sean

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	New Version Notification for draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-00.txt
Date: 	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:56:51 -0700
From: 	internet-drafts <at> ietf.org
To: 	Sean Leonard <dev+ietf <at> seantek.com>, Sean Leonard 
<dev+ietf <at> seantek.com>

A new version of I-D, draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Sean Leonard and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9
Revision:	00
Title:		Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Registrations for PKCS #9
Document date:	2014-09-10
Group:		Individual Submission
(Continue reading)

kurt | 24 May 15:56 2012

Brakuje Ci pieniedzy? Proponujemy proste rozwiazanie – dodatkowa praca.

Dzien dobry!

Chcielibysmy podziekowac za zainteresowanie wakatem regionalnego przedstawiciela juz dostepnego w
Polsce i krajach Europy Srodkowej. 

Pozwolcie mi w skrocie prezentowac Panstwu nasza wybitna firme.
W.U.G. Inc szybko rozwiwala sie zaczynajac od roku 1992, zeby stac sie jedna z najwiekszych fachowych
poradniczych organizacji w swiecie.
Siec przedstawicielstw West Union Group znajduje sie w ponad 32 krajach swiadczacych uslugi do 46 krajow.
Specjalizujemy sie w doradztwie w zakresie planowania podatkowego, rejestracji firm, nadajac rowniez
dodatkowe finansowe uslugi wsparcia dla firm zagranicznych.
WUG INC jest jedna z najbardziej znanych firm na swiecie, szczegolnie w takich krajach jak USA, Kanadzie i
niektorych krajach UE.

Niestety WUG INC nie jest w stanie otworzyc biura operacyjne w kazdym kraju, otoz my oferojemy stanowisko
przedstawiciela regionalnego by zatrudnic dodatkowych pracownikow w waszym miescie.
Przeprowadzamy wiekszosc naszych operacji z klientami biznesowymi glownie za posrednictwem Internetu.

Glowne obowiazki przedstawiciela regionalnego beda obejmowac obrobke przelewow pienieznych ze swoich
kont i pomagac klientom zaplacic rachunki w potrzebnym czasie.

Dlatego regionalny przedstawiciel bedzie mial do czynienia z dosc prostymi, ale bardzo
odpowiedzialnymi zadaniami przetwarzania oraz zapewnienie niezbednego wsparcia dla roznych transakcji.

Wasza comiesieczna placa zarobkowa zlozy 2500 Euro za miesiac.

Prosze zrozumiec, ze znaczna czesc zadan zostanie dostarczona przed poludniem lub w ciagu dziennego czasu.
Zwroccie uwage, ze proponujemu pozycje o niepelnym wymiarze godzin, wiec trzeba bedzie wydac tylko 2-3
godzin dziennie na tej prace.

(Continue reading)

ietf-ldapbis | 24 May 04:24 2012

Czy dysponujesz dwoma wolnymi godzinami w tygodniu? Oto jak zarobc 185 EUR w tym czasie.

Milego dnia!

Dziekujemy bardzo za zainteresowanie pozycja regionalnego przedstawiciela dostepna obecnie w Polsce i
krajach Europy Srodkowej. 

Z waszego pozwolenia chce krotko przedstawic Panstwu nasza firme.
W.U.G. Inc szybko rozwiwala sie zaczynajac od roku 1992, zeby stac sie jedna z najwiekszych fachowych
poradniczych organizacji w swiecie.
Siec przedstawicielstw West Union Group jest reprezentowana w ponad 32 krajach i swiadczy uslugi do 46 krajow.
Nasza specjalizacja - porada co do podatkowego planowania, rejestracji firm oraz dodatkowe uslugi w
zakresie wspierania firm zagranicznych.
WUG jest dobrze znana w USA, Kanadzie i niektorych panstwach Unii Europejskiej.

Niestety WUG INC nie jest w stanie otworzyc biura operacyjne w kazdym kraju, otoz my oferojemy stanowisko
przedstawiciela regionalnego by zatrudnic dodatkowych pracownikow w waszym miescie.
Wiele operacji z naszymi klientami odbywa sie online.

Regionalny przedstawiciel bedzie musial pomoc klientowi zaplacic za korzystanie z uslug firmy i
przekonac sie, ze oplata byla obrobiona pomyslnie.

Regionalny Przedstawiciel bedzie odpowiedzialny za pomoc naszym klientom z niektorymi ugodami i
przetwarzanie przelewow.

Wynagrodzenie Przedstawiciela Regionalnego wynosi 2500 euro miesiecznie.

Prosze zrozumiec, ze znaczna czesc zadan zostanie dostarczona przed poludniem lub w ciagu dziennego czasu.
Prosimy was odnotowac, ze to nie jest to proces zatrudniania na pelny etat, lecz na niepelny dzien roboczy,
tak ze bedziecie mialy szanse utrzymac wasza glowna prace i tracic 2-3 godziny na ta prace.

Aby zostac czlonkiem naszego zespolu, wymaga sie, zeby zakonczyliscie dwutygodniowy okres probny.
(Continue reading)

Michael Ströder | 12 Apr 11:23 2012

Any case where same controlType is used twice?

HI!

Is there any known LDAP extended control which is used more than once in a
LDAPRequest or LDAPResponse? Or can a client expect that a controlType is only
used exactly once in the list of returned controls in a single message?

Up to now I've never seen something like this but one never knows.

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 3134 bytes
pankaj bhamare | 25 Jun 09:16 2009
Picon

ldapadd issue in custom objectclass

 

hi,
I have created custom object class and its attribute

attributetype ( 1.2006.08.20.1 NAME 'DealerCode'
DESC 'RFC2256: Dealer code'
SUP name )

attributetype ( 1.2006.08.20.2 NAME 'GroupCode'
DESC 'RFC2256: Group code'
SUP name )

objectclass ( 1.2006.08.20.3 NAME 'DealerMaster'
DESC 'Information regarding dealer'
SUP top STRUCTURAL
MUST ( DealerCode )
MAY ( GroupCode $ mail ))

i have stored this file in /etc/openldap/schema/dealer.schema then i have include this file in slapd.conf file then i have started server.
For testing purpose i have created one ldif file

dn: DealerCode=PankajB,dc=abacus,dc=com
DealerCode: PankajB
objectClass: DealerMaster

When i execute this ldif file with below mention command

ldapadd -x -D "cn=Manager,dc=abacus,dc=com" -W -f dealerentry.ldif

It ask for ldap password after entering the password

"adding new entry "DealerCode=PankajB,dc=abacus,dc=com"
appears on sceen then it hangs

Awaiting for your reply.
Thanks in advance

Ludovic Poitou | 19 Nov 20:13 2008
Picon

LDAP Bar BOF Tonight 8pm.

Hi,

As Kurt mentioned in the App Area, there will be an LDAP Bar BOF this  
Wednesday for those interested that are in Minneapolis.

Meet in the lobby at 8pm and we'll figure out a place to talk over  
dinner.

Overview (copied from initial LDAP BOF proposal):

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) BOF

Chair(s): TBD

The purpose of this BOF is to discuss the formation of a working group  
to undertake LDAP standards work.  It is conceived that the proposed  
WG would undertake both the revision of existing technical  
specifications for LDAP extensions and the engineering of new LDAP  
extensions.

There are numerous existing technical specifications for LDAP  
extensions.  Most of the Standard Track specifications were published  
prior to the current LDAP "core" specification [RFC 4510] and are in  
the need of revision.  In some cases, it may be more appropriate to  
move the extension off the Standards Track.   While the work of  
determining which RFC should be revised (or moved off to a different  
track), and prioritization of the work, could be deferred to the WG,  
it is hoped that the BOF will reach some conclusions as to which  
revision work is of the highest priority.

There are also numerous extensions to LDAP which seem worthy of  
standardization. It is hoped that the BOF will reach some conclusion  
as to short list of new extension work items to be undertaken (at  
least initially) by the proposed WG.  That short list might include,  
for instance, in LDAP Transactions and Extensions for X.500 Alignment.

By including both revision and new engineering work items in a single  
working group it is hoped that the sufficient participation levels  
will be maintained to make reasonable progress in both revision and  
new engineering work.

Ludovic Poitou                                    Sun Microsystems Inc.
OpenDS Community Lead               Directory Services
http://blogs.sun.com/Ludo/         Grenoble Engineering Center - France

Sun Microsystems requires the following notice:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE:  This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Emiel van de Laar | 11 Sep 00:30 2008

Standard test suite for LDAP client testing?

Hello list,

I'm posting this to two mailing lists... Hope no one minds.

I'm working on an LDAP client API implementation. To test the
API I'm looking for a standard test set (data) which can be
loaded into various server implementations.

The closest thing I have found so far is the following project
which seems to be quite dormant.

http://www.opengroup.org/dif/blits/

The LDIFs I tried worked for 99%; a couple of errors were found
relating to schema. It is quite dated...

And then there are the test cases... which could probably be
updated as well.

Any one have any other recommendations? Perhaps someone is
involved with BLITS or something similar?

I could flesh out my own test data and test cases but I'd
rather build on something that already exists.

Thanks in advance!

Regards,

- Emiel van de Laar

Emiel van de Laar | 11 Sep 00:27 2008
Picon

Standard test suite for LDAP client testing?

Hello list,

I'm posting this to two mailing lists... Hope no one minds.

I'm working on an LDAP client API implementation. To test the
API I'm looking for a standard test set (data) which can be
loaded into various server implementations.

The closest thing I have found so far is the following project
which seems to be quite dormant.

http://www.opengroup.org/dif/blits/

The LDIFs I tried worked for 99%; a couple of errors were found
relating to schema. It is quite dated...

And then there are the test cases... which could probably be
updated as well.

Any one have any other recommendations? Perhaps someone is
involved with BLITS or something similar?

I could flesh out my own test data and test cases but I'd
rather build on something that already exists.

Thanks in advance!

Regards,

- Emiel van de Laar

Michael Ströder | 9 Sep 10:17 2008

Revising attribute type 'mail'?

HI!

Given that RFC 5336 and RFC 5337 are out now the question arises whether

1. attribute type 'mail' defined in RFC 4524 should be revised to use
LDAP syntax DirectoryString instead of IA5String with a new OID but the
same NAME 'mail'

or

2. a new attribute type should be defined with a different NAME.

Personally I tend to 1.

Ciao, Michael.

Kurt Zeilenga | 29 Aug 23:48 2008

IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal

I intend to send a BOF proposal for IETF#73 for the purpose of forming  
a new working group to undertake LDAP standards work.  Below is a  
rough proposal for your consideration and comments.  (I am surely  
biased as what new engineering efforts the proposed WG ought take on,  
please do feel free to offer other possible work items.)

-- Kurt

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) BOF

Chair(s): TBD

The purpose of this BOF is to discuss the formation of a working group  
to undertake LDAP standards work.  It is conceived that the proposed  
WG would undertake both the revision of existing technical  
specifications for LDAP extensions and the engineering of new LDAP  
extensions.

There are numerous existing technical specifications for LDAP  
extensions.  Most of the Standard Track specifications were published  
prior to the current LDAP "core" specification [RFC 4510] and are in  
the need of revision.  In some cases, it may be more appropriate to  
move the extension off the Standards Track.   While the work of  
determining which RFC should be revised (or moved off to a different  
track), and prioritization of the work, could be deferred to the WG,  
it is hoped that the BOF will reach some conclusions as to which  
revision work is of the highest priority.

There are also numerous extensions to LDAP which seem worthy of  
standardization. It is hoped that the BOF will reach some conclusion  
as to short list of new extension work items to be undertaken (at  
least initially) by the proposed WG.  That short list might include,  
for instance, in LDAP Transactions and Extensions for X.500 Alignment.

By including both revision and new engineering work items in a single  
working group it is hoped that the sufficient participation levels  
will be maintained to make reasonable progress in both revision and  
new engineering work.
Michael Ströder | 18 Aug 15:18 2008

Change of name forms and DIT structure rules when renaming an entry

HI!

when displaying an input form for renaming an entry I'd like to let the 
user search for possible new superior DNs. If applicable I'd like to 
construct the search filter derived from applicable DIT structure rules.
So the question is how to find the structural object classes which are 
allowed for superior entries.

X.501 (1993) section 12.6.5 says:
"Each object and alias entry is governed by a single DIT structure rule."

Currently I determine the governing structure rule by looking up the 
best matching name form for 1. the structural object class and 2. the 
current old RDN. Then I can derive the possible superior structure rules 
and lookup the superior structural object classes via the accompanying 
name forms.

But now I wonder what to do in case the user wants to change the RDN 
together with a new superior DN in one rename operation? From my 
understanding changing the RDN could lead to another governing structure 
rule. Is that right?

Ciao, Michael.

P.S.: I'd appreciate interop testing over Internet regarding this...

--

-- 
Michael Ströder
E-Mail: michael <at> stroeder.com
http://www.stroeder.com


Gmane