headers
LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN | 2 Nov 2006 14:22

RE: [mpls] RE: CCAMP Working group last callondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt

Hi Lee

Sorry for this late answer.
Thanks for your comments, please see inline, 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsberg <at> cisco.com] 
> Envoyé : dimanche 22 octobre 2006 08:37
> À : zzx-adrian <at> olddog.co.uk; isis-wg <at> ietf.org; ospf <at> ietf.org; 
> mpls <at> lists.ietf.org
> Cc : routing-discussion <at> ietf.org
> Objet : [mpls] RE: [Isis-wg] CCAMP Working group last 
> callondraft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-02.txt 
> 
> In regards to the IS-IS definitions, there is (again - sorry 
> JP...) confusion in the use of the terms TLV and subTLV.
> 
> For example, in Section 2 it states:
> 
> <snip>
> A new TLV is defined for ISIS and OSPF: the TE Node Capability 
>    Descriptor TLV, to be carried within: 
>         - The ISIS Capability TLV ([ISIS-CAP]) for ISIS...
> <end snip>
> 
> If the information is carried within another TLV, then it is 
> clearly subTLV information - the difference between the two 
> is more than terminology since it impacts both the encoding 
> and the scope of the identifiers which are assigned.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
David Ward | 7 Nov 2006 00:46
Picon
Favicon

ISIS WG meeting cancelled for IETF 67

All -

    Unfortunately due to the inability of a couple of presenters to be in
San Diego this week, we must cancel the ISIS WG meeting on Thurs.

Sorry for the late notice.

-DWard
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Internet-Drafts | 15 Nov 2006 21:50
Picon
Favicon

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group of the IETF.

	Title		: Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions in Support of Generalized
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
	Author(s)	: K. Kompella, Y. Rekhter
	Filename	: draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt
	Pages		: 12
	Date		: 2006-11-15
	
    This document specifies encoding of extensions to the IS-IS routing
    protocol in support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
    (GMPLS).

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to 
i-d-announce-request <at> ietf.org with the word unsubscribe in the body of 
the message. 
You can also visit https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce 
to change your subscription settings.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the 
username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After 
logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then 
"get draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt".

A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Adrian Farrel | 22 Nov 2006 14:24
Picon

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

Hi,

Can someone let us know what is happening here?

I don't see any discussion of this on the mailing list either before or 
after submission, and I can't spot any differences between the RFC and the 
content of this I-D.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Internet-Drafts <at> ietf.org>
To: <i-d-announce <at> ietf.org>
Cc: <isis-wg <at> ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group of 
> the IETF.
>
> Title : Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions in 
> Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
> Author(s) : K. Kompella, Y. Rekhter
> Filename : draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt
> Pages : 12
> Date : 2006-11-15
>
>    This document specifies encoding of extensions to the IS-IS routing
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Hannes Gredler | 22 Nov 2006 17:58
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

adrian,

my guess is that the significant change is this:

-Kompella & Rekhter           Informational                      [Page 2]
+Kompella & Rekhter           Standards Track                    [Page 2]

HTH,

/hannes

Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can someone let us know what is happening here?
> 
> I don't see any discussion of this on the mailing list either before or
> after submission, and I can't spot any differences between the RFC and
> the content of this I-D.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Adrian Farrel | 23 Nov 2006 17:43
Picon

Re: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

Ah yes.
Thanks!

Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hannes Gredler" <hannes <at> juniper.net>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian <at> olddog.co.uk>
Cc: <isis-wg <at> ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt

> adrian,
> 
> my guess is that the significant change is this:
> 
> -Kompella & Rekhter           Informational                      [Page 2]
> +Kompella & Rekhter           Standards Track                    [Page 2]
> 
> HTH,
> 
> /hannes
> 
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Can someone let us know what is happening here?
>> 
>> I don't see any discussion of this on the mailing list either before or
>> after submission, and I can't spot any differences between the RFC and
>> the content of this I-D.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
JP Vasseur | 29 Nov 2006 21:13
Picon
Favicon

Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]

Hi Acee,

Thanks for your comments -

As soon as you ACK that the changes address your comments I'll post  
the updated ID.

see in line,

On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> JP,
>
> One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
> apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
> reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)
>

OK. Text added:

OLD:

    The Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is OPTIONAL and MUST
    appear at most once within the Link TLV (Type 2) that is itself
    carried within the Traffic Engineering LSA specified in  
[RFC3630]. If
    a second instance of the Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is
    present, the receiving system MUST only process the first  
instance of
    the sub-TLV.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |
headers
Acee Lindem | 30 Nov 2006 17:56
Picon
Favicon

Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]

Hi JP,
Looks good. See one question below.

JP Vasseur wrote:
> Hi Acee,
>
> Thanks for your comments -
>
> As soon as you ACK that the changes address your comments I'll post 
> the updated ID.
>
> see in line,
>
> On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>
>> JP,
>>
>> One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
>> apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
>> reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)
>>
>
> OK. Text added:
>
> OLD:
>
>    The Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is OPTIONAL and MUST
>    appear at most once within the Link TLV (Type 2) that is itself
>    carried within the Traffic Engineering LSA specified in [RFC3630]. If
>    a second instance of the Number of 0-bandwidth TE LSP(s) sub-TLV is
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
JP Vasseur | 30 Nov 2006 20:29
Picon
Favicon

Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]

Hi Acee,

On Nov 30, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> Hi JP,
> Looks good. See one question below.
>
> JP Vasseur wrote:
>> Hi Acee,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments -
>>
>> As soon as you ACK that the changes address your comments I'll  
>> post the updated ID.
>>
>> see in line,
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>>
>>> JP,
>>>
>>> One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
>>> apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
>>> reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)
>>>
>>
>> OK. Text added:
>>
>> OLD:
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |
headers
Acee Lindem | 30 Nov 2006 20:32
Picon
Favicon

Re: [Fwd: [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-02.txt]

JP - Sounds good.
Acee
JP Vasseur wrote:
> Hi Acee,
>
> On Nov 30, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>
>> Hi JP,
>> Looks good. See one question below.
>>
>> JP Vasseur wrote:
>>> Hi Acee,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your comments -
>>>
>>> As soon as you ACK that the changes address your comments I'll post 
>>> the updated ID.
>>>
>>> see in line,
>>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>>>
>>>> JP,
>>>>
>>>> One more comment - Please write the document so that it can
>>>> apply to OSPFv3 TE as well. The existing draft can be an informative
>>>> reference (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-07.txt)
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK. Text added:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane