headers
David McGrew | 11 May 2009 20:49
Picon
Favicon

ISOC sponsoring research paper on Trust and Identity

FYI - ISOC is sponsoring a research paper for NDSS 2010 on Trust and  
Identity.  If you are interested please contact Kevin for details.

David

Begin forwarded message:
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	ISOC sponsoring research paper on Trust and Identity
> Date: 	Thu, 7 May 2009 16:44:02 -0400
> From: 	Kevin Craemer <Craemer <at> isoc.org>
> To: 	<irtf-chair <at> irtf.org>
> CC: 	<lynch <at> isoc.org>
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Falk,
> The Internet Society is sponsoring a research paper on Trust and  
> Identity in
> connection with the 2010 Network and Distributed System Security  
> Symposium
> (NDSS'10) in San Diego. Lucy Lynch suggested to me that this might  
> be of
> interest to you and colleagues of yours in connection with the work  
> of the
> IRTF and/or the GENI project.
>
> Below are additional details and a link to the Call for Papers.  
> Please let
> me know if I can answer any questions.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
David McGrew | 29 May 2009 01:14
Picon
Favicon

Re: DNSSEC considering adopting GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94


On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:02 AM, Christian Rechberger wrote:

> Quoting Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman <at> vpnc.org>:
>
>> At 6:00 AM -0700 4/27/09, David McGrew wrote:
>>> some other important questions: how widely reviewed is that  
>>> algorithm?
>>
>> I believe that Ólafur would like CFRG to determine the answer to  
>> that question. The expertise for "how widely reviewed" is in this  
>> group, not in DNSEXT.
>>
>>> What are the claimed security levels?
>>
>> And herein lies a problem. The GOST specs are in Russian. I do not  
>> believe that there are any official English translations, and that  
>> the unofficial ones are expensive. (I would love to be wrong about  
>> either of those statements.) I have Cc' the author of the relevant  
>> draft on this message so he can help.
>>
>>> Where is guidance on how to use the algorithm?
>>
>> In the draft itself:
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dolmatov-dnsext-dnssec-gost-00.txt 
>> >

The draft doesn't have a "security considerations" section.   There is  
no guidance other than key size and hash size, and neither the draft  
nor RFC 4357 describe what the targeted security level is, or describe
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane