Moving the IPORPR working group from the Sub-IP area to the Internet Area has been talked about ever since the liaison role with the IEEE was depreciated. The move is finally going to happen now. Scott (speaking for Bert who is on vacation but who knows about and supports the move)
Scott,
Should I presume this is part of the move to shutdown the Sub-IP area ?
I don't understand your comment about the IEEE liaison role. Could you clarify?
FWIW, at the last IEEE 802.17 RPR meeting I was assigned the role of liaison to the IETF (at least for OAM & MIB issues). Though at this point the RPR group has nothing to liaise... but there will be another 802.17 meeting the week before IETF.
Cheers,
Glenn
----------
From: Scott Bradner
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:33 AM
To: iporpr <at> ietf.org
Cc: bwijnen <at> lucent.com; narten <at> us.ibm.com; nordmark <at> eng.sun.com
Subject: [IPORPR] iporpr moving to INT
Moving the IPORPR working group from the Sub-IP area to the Internet Area
has been talked about ever since the liaison role with the IEEE was
depreciated. The move is finally going to happen now.
Scott (speaking for Bert who is on vacation but who knows about and
supports the move)
> Should I presume this is part of the move to shutdown the Sub-IP area ? no - it is unrelated to any overall Sub-IP move and, as I mentioned, was due to happen quite a while ago > I don't understand your comment about the IEEE liaison role. one of the original purposes of the WG (and the reason that it was in the Sub IP Area in the first place) was that it was going to give architectural advice to the IEEE about RPR - that is no longer a goal Scott
RSS Feed1 | |
|---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
2 | |
1 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
3 | |
6 | |
1 | |
7 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
5 | |
2 | |
1 | |
34 | |
49 | |
1 | |
3 |
