Arnt Gulbrandsen | 15 Apr 21:35 2014
Picon

what we need is obviously .imap, so we can have dinner.friendsof.imap

Wrote one of my registrars: "You may be aware that a batch of new Top Level 
Domains (TLDs) from ICANN have started rolling out" and the first mentioned 
domain is:

   .EMAIL

God have mercy.

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

Barry Leiba | 6 Mar 11:42 2014
Picon

draft-ietf-appsawg-multimailbox-search

IMAP denizens...

Chris Newman has asked that we consider moving the Multimailbox Search
extension to Standards Track (it was published as RFC 6237 as
Experimental).  Appsawg is handling that:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-multimailbox-search/

I'd like to ask the IMAP crowd to do two things:

1. Review the document and post comments to apps-discuss <at> ietf.org

2. Tell us, in your review or separately here, if you (a) have
implemented it and/or (b) have interest in implementing it (and
specify client, server, or both).

Please take a few minutes to do this -- the document isn't long, and
we very much need the reviews to move this ahead.

Thanks,
Barry

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

The IESG | 24 Feb 18:33 2014
Picon

Protocol Action: 'IMAP Extensions for Conditional STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox Resynchronization (QRESYNC)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'IMAP Extensions for Conditional STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes
   Resynchronization (CONDSTORE) and Quick Mailbox Resynchronization
   (QRESYNC)'
  (draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the IMAP QRESYNC Extension Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Barry Leiba and Pete Resnick.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

Technical Summary

This document rolls together two sets of changes, one for CONDSTORE
and one for QRESYNC, for the IMAP protocol.  Errata have been
addressed, as well as a small number of technical issues with the
existing RFCs 4551 and 5162.  The document is intended to obsolete
both documents.  Its status should be Proposed Standard, although it
should be possible to elevate it relatively soon.

Review and Consensus

Along with the shepherd, several implementors reviewed the document
and came to consensus.  This discussion caught an issue relating to
mod-sequence-value.  More than rough consensus exists, and this
is a fairly uncontroversial document.  An apps directorate
review was performed. All issues were resolved.

(Continue reading)

IETF Secretariat | 24 Feb 18:33 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt>

IESG has approved the document and state has been changed to Approved-announcement sent
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

Spencer Dawkins | 20 Feb 07:23 2014
Picon

Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a question, not a request for a text change.

In section 4.  Long Command Lines (Update to RFC 2683), does this work
because the only implementations using command lines longer than 1000
bytes are using them to implement this spec?

I wasn't completely comfortable updating RFC 2683 in a document that's
mostly defining new extensions, wondering if that update would be visible
enough to implementers who weren't reading this spec. I'm just majing
sure I'm wrong about that ...

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
(Continue reading)

IETF Secretariat | 20 Feb 20:07 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt>

IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

IETF Secretariat | 4 Feb 20:05 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt>

IANA review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

IETF Secretariat | 4 Feb 15:40 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt>

IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

georgehanes | 30 Jan 23:07 2014

Be cautious of this computer science conference

Be cautious of this computer science conference

If you have any thought of attending the world’s biggest 
f-a-k-e conference in computer science 
http://www.world-academy-of-science.org  you should visit 
any websites below

https://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 
or
https://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf 
https://sites.google.com/site/moneycomp1
https://sites.google.com/site/worlddump4

The organizer of this conference is H-amid A-rabnia  
http://www.cs.uga.edu/~hra  a professor from University 
of Georgia, Athens, US.  He already earned millions of 
dollars from the registration fee. He recently started 
a new conference CSCI due to his hunger for money 
http://www.americancse.org 

He did not reveal the reviews and reviewers' information 
for all the papers he received, despite repeated requests 
and challenges. The reason for his failure is there are 
no reviews and reviewers and he just cheated the research 
community for more than a decade by announcing that each 
draft paper is reviewed by two experts. We challenge him 
to publish these details at the conference website. 
Where are your experts? Where are your reviews? 

Soon he comes up with a story announcing that he lost all 
(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 30 Jan 19:21 2014
Picon

New Version Notification - draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt


A new version (-10) has been submitted for draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10.txt

The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

Diff from previous version:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-10

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

IETF Secretariat.

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

DraftTracker Mail System | 27 Jan 09:11 2014
Picon

Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09.txt>


Please DO NOT reply to this email.

I-D: <draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09.txt>
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis/

IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to
Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext


Gmane