2 Dec 2010 09:54
with protocol types Re: AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt
Jiankang YAO <yaojk <at> cnnic.cn>
2010-12-02 08:54:22 GMT
2010-12-02 08:54:22 GMT
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov <at> isode.com> To: "EAI WG" <ima <at> ietf.org> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt > Alexey Melnikov wrote: > >> 4. IANA Considerations >> >> +---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+ >> | WITH protocol | Description | Reference | >> | types | | | >> +---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+ >> | UTF8SMTPbis | UTF8SMTPbis with Service | [RFCXXXX] | >> | | Extensions | | >> | UTF8SMTPbisA | UTF8SMTPbis with SMTP AUTH | [RFC4954] [RFCXXXX] | >> | UTF8SMTPbisS | UTF8SMTPbis with STARTTLS | [RFC3207] [RFCXXXX] | >> | UTF8SMTPbisSA | UTF8SMTPbis with both | [RFC3207] [RFC4954] | >> | | STARTTLS and SMTP AUTH | [RFCXXXX] | >> +---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+ >> >> Do we really need to change the WITH protocol types? > > I remembered one more thing: if other LMTP related changes are done, > this section should also register values for LMTP. E.g. > UTF8LMTP/UTF8LMTPA/UTF8LMTPS/UTF8LMTPSA. >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed