headers
Ilya Varlashkin | 11 Jun 2010 13:30

Re: Working group last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-01

Hi,

What happened to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-01 while
at IESG? I see the draft status as expired.

/iLya

> The WGLC has completed.  There were no issues raised, so we'll be
forwarding the draft to the IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard
RFC.
>
> --John
> 
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:36 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> This is to start the IDR WG Last Call on advancing
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-01.txt as an
Informational RFC. The deadline for comments is February 26, 2010.
>> 
>> A URL for the draft is
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteri
a-01
>> 
>> --John
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Jeffrey Haas | 18 Jun 2010 02:45

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:46:06PM -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> I'm not sure why this could not be done with the existing
> NOTIFICATION.  The Cease code has no subcodes, but 'over prefix limit'
> and 'reboot' could certainly be added and there is already a data
> field which is unused for Cease and could be defined as human readable
> free form, zero padded.

http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.xhtml#bgp-parameters-8

You mean some of those?

(Note, this is not meant to pick on the advisory draft.  I'll do that in a
different response.)

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Jeffrey Haas | 18 Jun 2010 02:47

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory

My apologies to the list.  Apparently I had something stuck in a mail agent
somewhere.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:45:01AM +0000, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:46:06PM -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > I'm not sure why this could not be done with the existing
> > NOTIFICATION.  The Cease code has no subcodes, but 'over prefix limit'
> > and 'reboot' could certainly be added and there is already a data
> > field which is unused for Cease and could be defined as human readable
> > free form, zero padded.
> 
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.xhtml#bgp-parameters-8
> 
> You mean some of those?
> 
> (Note, this is not meant to pick on the advisory draft.  I'll do that in a
> different response.)
> 
> -- Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
John Scudder | 18 Jun 2010 17:04
Favicon

Re: Working group last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-01

I believe this is waiting on a proto-writeup from the chairs -- i.e., my bad.  Will fix, thanks for the reminder.

--John

On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Ilya Varlashkin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> What happened to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-01 while
> at IESG? I see the draft status as expired.
> 
> /iLya
> 
>> The WGLC has completed.  There were no issues raised, so we'll be
> forwarding the draft to the IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard
> RFC.
>> 
>> --John
>> 
>> On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:36 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> This is to start the IDR WG Last Call on advancing
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-01.txt as an
> Informational RFC. The deadline for comments is February 26, 2010.
>>> 
>>> A URL for the draft is
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteri
> a-01
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
John Scudder | 24 Jun 2010 03:21
Favicon

Re: IETF-78 agenda topics

Folks,

So far we have two agenda slot requests (from Ilya Varlashkin and Robert Raszuk).  The overall IETF agenda is
very crowded this time around and as a result, we need to get an accurate estimate of how much time we will
need.  

As announced, if you want a slot this time around you do have until July 12 to request it.  However, if you know
that you MAY want a slot but haven't yet requested it, please let the chairs know ASAP -- by the end of the week
if possible -- to help us estimate the length of our agenda.  

Thanks,

--John

On May 17, 2010, at 2:29 PM, John Scudder wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> We're planning to meet at IETF-78.  Please forward any IDR agenda items you might have to Sue and myself.  The
deadline is July 12, 2010 by 13:00 U.S. Eastern Time.
> 
> If you plan to make a presentation, please keep in mind the IDR tradition, "no Internet Draft - no time
slot".  You should also plan to send your slides to Sue and me no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting.
> 
> --John & Sue

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane