Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists <at> gmail.com>
2009-07-01 14:57:31 GMT
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo<jzp-idr <at> rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote:
>> On 30 Jun 2009, at 18:58, Ron Bonica wrote:
>> >Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
>> >general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
>> >strong support for the draft.
>> >In light of strong operator support, I would like to encourage the
>> >WG to
>> >consider adopting this draft as a WG item.
>> Ron, all --
>> I support the advisory proposal as is.
>> I was present when the straw poll was taken at nanog and agree that
>> the operator community show a huge volume of support for this proposal.
> As stated last go-round, yes yes and yes. The sticky, et al ideas
> make for goo -01 update fodder, but the concept is sound and as
> long as it is a) negotiated and b) any message-type lists have
+1 for a)
the overall concept would be helpful.
> accomodations for free-text* then it will be strongly supported
> by the operator community at large.
> * most network operators are humble enough to realize we can't
> possibly foresee all conditions needed in human interprovider
> RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
> Idr mailing list
> Idr <at> ietf.org
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org