Inter-Domain Routing (idr)

headers Ross Callon | 1 Jul 2009 01:26

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:58:14PM -0400, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
> general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
> strong support for the draft.
> 
> In light of strong operator support, I would like to encourage the WG to
> consider adopting this draft as a WG item.

I completely support this, and I think the numerous benefits for network
operators have already been amply stated.

--

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras <at> e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Support.

Isacco
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Bonica" <rbonica <at> juniper.net>
To: <idr <at> ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:58 PM
Subject: [Idr] draft-scholl-idr-advisory

> Folks,
> 
> Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
> general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
> strong support for the draft.
> 
> In light of strong operator support, I would like to encourage the WG to
> consider adopting this draft as a WG item.
> 
>                                    Ron Bonica
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:58:14PM -0400, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
> general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
> strong support for the draft.

I'd like to add my support for this draft.

In addition, I presented at the last LINX meeting relating to the the problems
observed with AS4_PATH earlier in the year, mentioning this draft.The feedback
that I got from the operators that I spoke to at the meeting was overwhelmingly
positive towards both draft-ietf-idr-optional-transitive and Tom's draft.

Kind regards,
Rob

--

-- 
Rob Shakir                      <rjs <at> eng.gxn.net>
Network Development Engineer    GX Networks/Vialtus Solutions
ddi: +44208 587 6077            mob: +44797 155 4098
pgp: 0xc07e6deb                 nic-hdl: RJS-RIPE

This email is subject to: http//www.vialtus.com/disclaimer.html

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Yakov Rekhter wrote:

> Folks,
>
> We received a request to accept  draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an
> IDR WG document. The deadline for comments on this request is July 14,
> 2009.

Please adopt.

regards,
--

-- 
Paul Jakma	paul <at> jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
The road to Hades is easy to travel.
 		-- Bion
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Support 

James Uttaro 

-----Original Message-----
From: idr-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:05 PM
To: idr <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an IDR WG document

I believe the working group should accept this draft, and work to get it

completed rapidly.

Yours,
Joel

Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We received a request to accept  draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an
> IDR WG document. The deadline for comments on this request is July 14,
> 2009.
> 
> Yakov
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To: idr at ietf.org 
> Subject: [Idr] draft-scholl-idr-advisory 
> From: Ron Bonica <rbonica at juniper.net> 
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:58:14 -0400 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
> general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
> strong support for the draft.
> 
> In light of strong operator support, I would like to encourage the WG
to
> consider adopting this draft as a WG item.
> 
>                                     Ron Bonica
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Support.
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo<jzp-idr <at> rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Andy Davidson wrote:
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2009, at 18:58, Ron Bonica wrote:
>>
>> >Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
>> >general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
>> >strong support for the draft.
>> >
>> >In light of strong operator support, I would like to encourage the
>> >WG to
>> >consider adopting this draft as a WG item.
>>
>> Ron, all --
>>
>> I support the advisory proposal as is.
>>
>> I was present when the straw poll was taken at nanog and agree that
>> the operator community show a huge volume of support for this proposal.
>
> As stated last go-round, yes yes and yes. The sticky, et al ideas
> make for goo -01 update fodder, but the concept is sound and as
> long as it is a) negotiated and b) any message-type lists have

+1 for a)

the overall concept would be helpful.

-Chris

> accomodations for free-text* then it will be strongly supported
> by the operator community at large.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joe
>
> * most network operators are humble enough to realize we can't
>  possibly foresee all conditions needed in human interprovider
>  signalling
>
>
> --
>             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

please adopt

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:20:37PM -0700, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We received a request to accept  draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an
> IDR WG document. The deadline for comments on this request is July 14,
> 2009.
> 
> Yakov
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To: idr at ietf.org 
> Subject: [Idr] draft-scholl-idr-advisory 
> From: Ron Bonica <rbonica at juniper.net> 
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:58:14 -0400 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Last month, Tom Scholl presented draft-scholl-idr-advisory to NANOG's
> general meeting in Philadelphia. The operator community demonstrated
> strong support for the draft.
> 
> In light of strong operator support, I would like to encourage the WG to
> consider adopting this draft as a WG item.
> 
>                                     Ron Bonica
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

--

-- 
Dave Cooper
Global Crossing, Ltd.
(602) 744-3473 (voip)
(916) 316-9218 (mobile)
dcooper <at> GBLX.net 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

> We received a request to accept draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an
> IDR WG document. The deadline for comments on this request is July 14,
> 2009.

	I'm in favor of accepting this as a WG document.

	Dave

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

19	June 2013
19	May 2013
22	April 2013
62	March 2013
73	February 2013
115	January 2013
309	December 2012
79	November 2012
44	October 2012
42	September 2012
117	August 2012
86	July 2012
267	June 2012
40	May 2012
58	April 2012
111	March 2012
42	February 2012
53	January 2012
65	December 2011
177	November 2011
43	October 2011
9	September 2011
42	August 2011
33	July 2011
172	June 2011
43	May 2011
236	April 2011
166	March 2011
24	February 2011
33	January 2011
11	December 2010
156	November 2010
97	October 2010
115	September 2010
11	August 2010
124	July 2010
5	June 2010
14	May 2010
18	April 2010
43	March 2010
70	February 2010
7	January 2010
2	December 2009
32	November 2009
25	October 2009
2	September 2009
19	August 2009
144	July 2009
20	June 2009
33	May 2009
63	April 2009
185	March 2009
34	February 2009
26	January 2009
75	December 2008
112	November 2008
41	October 2008
60	September 2008
90	August 2008
69	July 2008
31	June 2008
45	May 2008
40	April 2008
47	March 2008
31	February 2008
15	January 2008
10	December 2007
4	November 2007
6	October 2007
16	September 2007
39	August 2007
34	July 2007
62	June 2007
3	May 2007
2	April 2007
32	March 2007
25	February 2007
8	January 2007
33	December 2006
21	November 2006
26	October 2006
107	September 2006
194	August 2006
12	July 2006
21	June 2006
13	May 2006
2	April 2006
21	March 2006
22	February 2006
83	January 2006
29	December 2005
54	November 2005
62	October 2005
15	September 2005
188	August 2005
29	July 2005
16	June 2005
1	May 2005
11	April 2005
18	March 2005
34	February 2005
22	January 2005
23	December 2004
30	November 2004
25	October 2004
46	September 2004
18	August 2004
54	July 2004
57	June 2004
210	May 2004
115	April 2004
111	March 2004
60	February 2004
12	January 2004
22	December 2003
39	November 2003
57	October 2003
47	September 2003
38	August 2003
66	July 2003
19	June 2003
43	May 2003
48	April 2003
98	March 2003
66	February 2003
91	January 2003
81	December 2002
137	November 2002
303	October 2002
735	September 2002
141	August 2002
227	July 2002
66	June 2002
112	May 2002
68	April 2002

Change in IDR WG chair

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an IDR WG document

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an IDR WG document

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an IDR WG document

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an IDR WG document

Re: draft-scholl-idr-advisory as an IDR WG document