Dear all,

I am just wondering whenever it is permitted or not to have this case:

<r2l chars><num1>.<num2>.<etc ..>

As you know in case r2l labels the display will be like this

<etc..>.<num1>.<num2><r2l chars>

As you see both of them have different display order which isn’t  the same as network order.

And I know it is mentioned in the RFC

And one of the statement is

  o  The sequence of labels should be consistent with network order.

      This proved impossible -- a domain name consisting of the labels

      in network order) L1.R2.R3.L4 will be displayed as L1.R3.R2.L4 in

      an LTR context.  (In an RTL context, it will be displayed as

      L4.R3.R2.L1)

And I have tried two implemented tools (well I don’t know if they follow the RFC fully or not).

http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/idna.jsp?a=%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%AF888.999.%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9#notes

http://mct.verisign-grs.com/conversiontool/convertServlet?input=%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%AF888.999.%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9&type=UTF8

Abdulrahman,