headers
McCann Peter-A001034 | 2 Nov 2010 17:07

Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-05
Reviewer: Pete McCann
Review Date: 2010-11-02
IETF LC End Date: 2010-11-03
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Nits/editorial comments: none
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Francis Dupont | 3 Nov 2010 15:00
Picon

re-review of draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-16.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-avt-rapid-acquisition-for-rtp-16.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20101103

Summary: Ready

I already reviewed the version -15.txt and I don't change the summary
for this new version.

Regards

Francis.Dupont <at> fdupont.fr
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Mary Barnes | 6 Nov 2010 14:29
Picon

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 04 Nov 2010

Hi all,

Here's the link to the new LC assignments for last week:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-101104-lc.html

The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,
Mary.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Brian E Carpenter | 7 Nov 2010 09:25
Picon

Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt



I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2010-11-07
IETF LC End Date: 2010-11-18
IESG Telechat date: 

Summary: Almost ready
--------

Minor issue:
------------

The acronym AOR is used 63 times in the draft without being defined, except by implication
in the title of reference [18]. This, and the rather abrupt start to the Introduction,
makes this a document that is quite hard to get into for an outsider. I know what "SIP"
stands for, but it should be expanded in the Abstract, and I'd like to see at least one
sentence of introduction to SIP before "One of SIP's primary functions is...".

Similarly, in the Introduction:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
kathleen.moriarty | 9 Nov 2010 16:42

Gen-ART review for draft-turner-md2-to-historic-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-turner-md2-to-historic
Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty
Review Date: November 9, 2010
IETF LC End Date: November 9, 2010
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:  This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.
The intent of this draft is to retire the MD2 message digest algorithm and providing the justification. 
This draft also requests that RFC 1319 be moved to historic.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
Section 4: Impact of Moving MD2 to Historic
The first bullet in the subsection "Regarding PS RFCs:" starts with Further, however it is the first bullet
so I recommend changing it to read:
"MD2 support in TLS was dropped in TLS 1.1"

Section 7: Recommendation
I recommend breaking the first paragraph into two sentences as follows:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Sean Turner | 10 Nov 2010 02:03

Re: Gen-ART review for draft-turner-md2-to-historic-05

Kathleen,

Thanks for the review.  I'll fix these up in the next version.

spt

On 11/9/2010 11:42 PM, kathleen.moriarty <at> emc.com wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-turner-md2-to-historic
> Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty
> Review Date: November 9, 2010
> IETF LC End Date: November 9, 2010
> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
>
> Summary:  This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.
> The intent of this draft is to retire the MD2 message digest algorithm and providing the justification. 
This draft also requests that RFC 1319 be moved to historic.
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Section 4: Impact of Moving MD2 to Historic
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Mary Barnes | 16 Nov 2010 04:42
Picon

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 15 Nov 2010

Hi all,

Here's the link to the new LC assignments for last week:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-101115-lc.html

The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,
Mary.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Mary Barnes | 16 Nov 2010 04:44
Picon

Assignments for Nov 18, 2010 Telechat

Hi all,

Sorry for the lateness.

Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the Nov 18th, 2010 telechat:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-101118.html

With the updated spreadsheets:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

For your convenience, the review boilerplate template is included below.

Note that reviews should ideally be posted to the gen-art mailing list
by COB on Tuesday:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/

Mary.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:
Reviewer:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Joel M. Halpern | 16 Nov 2010 16:54

review: draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-10.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-10.txt
     Mobility Support in IPv6
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 16-Nov-2010
IETF LC End Date: 22-Nov-2010
IESG Telechat date: 02-Dec-2010

Summary:  This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

Note: Given that this is a 170+ page update of an existing RFC, my 
review concentrated on the changes since RFC 3775, as arguing about 
content of 3775 should, it seems to me, have been done in the WG.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Avshalom Houri | 16 Nov 2010 17:57
Picon
Favicon

Gen Art LC + TC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra
Reviewer: Avshalom Houri
Review Date: 2010-11-16
IETF LC date: 2010-11-17
IESG Telechat date: 2010-11-18

Summary: The document is ready for a standard track RFC.

Major issues: None.
Minor issues: None.
Nits/editorial comments: There are contributors and acknowledgments sections.
It seems better to unify them and put both after the security considerations section. 
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane