headers
A. Jean Mahoney | 10 Feb 00:33
Favicon

Assignments for the 2012-02-16 telechat

Hi all,

Assignments for the telechat can be found here:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/reviewers-120216-telechat.html

With the updated spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

I've also updated the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

For your convenience, the review boilerplate template is included below.

Note that reviews should ideally be posted to the gen-art mailing list
by COB on Tuesday:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
A. Jean Mahoney | 10 Feb 00:22
Favicon

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2012-02-09

Hi all,

Here's the link to the new LC assignments:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/reviewers-120209-lc.html

The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

And I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Elwyn Davies | 9 Feb 12:52

Gen-art: Telechat review of draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6-08
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 9 February 2012
IETF LC End Date: 19 January 2012
IESG Telechat date: 19 January 2012-

Summary: Ready.  
For the record the various issues identified at last call have been fixed - thanks.

Major issues: 
None-

Minor issues:
None

Nits/editorial comments:
s4.1, last para: s/contradicting combination/contradictory combinations/ (2 places).
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Vijay K. Gurbani | 8 Feb 18:01
Favicon

Gen-ART review of draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-14
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Feb-08-2012
IETF LC End Date: Feb-21-2012
IESG Telechat date: Not known

Summary: This draft is ready as an Informational.

Major issues: 0
Minor issues: 0
Nits/editorial comments: 0

Thanks,

- vijay
--

-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani <at> alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Stephen Farrell | 8 Feb 17:45
Picon
Picon

Re: [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07


Thanks Miguel,

(cc'ing gen-art to close that loop)

S.

On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
> I did a quick past to the changes that I requested, and I think they are
> successfully implemented in version -08.
>
> /Miguel
>
> On 08/02/2012 13:52, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Stephen and all:
>> We have just done the update. Diff from previous version:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-08
>>
>> Would you like to go ahead?
>>
>> Regards!
>> -Qin
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stephen Farrell"<stephen.farrell <at> cs.tcd.ie>
>> To: "Tina TSOU"<Tina.Tsou.Zouting <at> huawei.com>
>> Cc:<miguel.a.garcia <at> ericsson.com>;<hokey <at> ietf.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
>>
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ben Campbell | 7 Feb 00:17
Favicon

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-03
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2012-02-06
IETF LC End Date: 2012-02-06

Summary:This draft is not quite ready for publication as a proposed standard. There are some potentially
significant issues that should be addressed first.

[Note: Hopefully this draft has had or will have a SecDir review, since it seems ripe for significant
security implications.]

*** Major issues:

-- I admit to not being a DHCP expert, but If I understand this draft correctly, it proposes to send what is
effectively a secret-key in a DHCPACK request, then use that key to authenticate a force renew message. It
seems like any eavesdropper could sniff that key, and use it to spoof force renew requests. The
introduction mentions that there may be some environments where the use of RFC3118 authentication could
be relaxed, and offers an example of such an environment. But nowhere does this draft appear to be limited
in scope to such environments. 

I think some additional text in (perhaps in the security considerations) is needed to explain either why
the vulnerability to eavesdroppers is either okay in general, or limits the mechanism's use to
environment where it is okay. It also seems like that, in the best case, this mechanism proves only that a
Forcerenew request comes from the same DHCP server as in the original transaction, but otherwise does not
prove anything about the identity of that server. If so, it would be worth mentioning it.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Francis Dupont | 6 Feb 16:05
Picon

review of draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20120202
IETF LC End Date: 20120206
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - no Acknowledgments?

 - Author's Address page 8: please add the country (USA) in the postal address

 - Change History page 8 (BTW will be removed by the RFC Editor :-):
  opion -> option

Thanks

Francis.Dupont <at> fdupont.fr
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Qin Wu | 3 Feb 05:53
Favicon

Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr-07

Hi,Elwyn:
Thank for your valuable review. please see our replies below.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elwyn Davies" <davieseb <at> scss.tcd.ie>
To: "General Area Review Team" <gen-art <at> ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr.all <at> tools.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:06 PM
Subject: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr-07

>I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr-07.txt
> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review Date: 2 February 2012
> IETF LC End Date: 24 January 2012
> IESG Telechat date: 16 February 2012
> 
> Summary:
> I have a couple of queries/minor issues regarding checking whether LMA1
> and LMA2 are the same node and some hand waving over the idea of
> 'localized routing setup/signaliing'.  There are also a few minor nits.
> Otherwise this is ready for the IESG.
> 
> [This document missed the normal gen-art last call allocation
> notification mechanism for some reason - so I didn't realize it was on
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
A. Jean Mahoney | 2 Feb 23:43
Favicon

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2012-02-02

Hi all,

Here's the link to the new LC assignments:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/reviewers-120202-lc.html

The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

And I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Miguel A. Garcia | 2 Feb 15:51
Picon
Favicon

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.a.garcia <at> ericsson.com>
Review Date: 2011-01-02
IETF LC End Date: 2012-02-07

Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described 
in the review.

Major issues:

- None

Minor issues:

- The main problem I have with this draft is the lack of normative text 
(RFC 2119 reserved words) in relevant paragraphs. If interoperability is 
to be granted, an effort should be taken in adding quite a few more 
normative statements.

However, having said that, the section where I find more that there 
should be more normative text, is Section 3, which is an "Overview" 
section. In general, an overview section should use descriptive, but not 
normative text.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
kathleen.moriarty | 2 Feb 15:15

Gen-ART review for draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-01

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-01
Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty
Review Date: 2012-02-02
IETF LC End Date: 2012-02-03
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication.
   This memo updates the registry of authentication method results in
   Authentication-Results: message header fields, correcting a
   discontinuity between the original registry creation and the SPF
   specification.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art <at> ietf.org<mailto:Gen-art <at> ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane