Brian E Carpenter | 25 Jan 20:29 2015
Picon

Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-02.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-01-26
IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-04
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Almost ready
--------

Minor issues:
-------------

1. Hop-by-hop options, and therefore Router Alert, are well known to
cause a serious performance issue or are simply ignored by many
routers (as warned in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7045#section-2.2).
A pointer to that warning would be appropriate.

2. I'm a bit surprised to realise that new definitions of Router Alert
options are not routinely notified to the 6MAN WG.
Peter Yee | 23 Jan 07:52 2015

Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework-09
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review Date: Jan-22-2015
IETF LC End Date: Jan-22-2015
IESG Telechat date: TBD

Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as a Standards Track
RFC, but has some nits that should be fixed before publication. [Ready with
nits.]

The draft specifies a framework for use in provisioning session
establishment data into Session Data Registries and SIP Service Provider
data stores, just like it says in the abstract.  It does not provide a
concrete protocol for these operations.  Most of my comments have to do with
niggling readability issues, not the substance of the document.  It seems
quite reasonable for its stated purpose.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: 

I'm not sure I wholly comfortable with how the framework describes the
protocol be created from it as a "transport protocol".  That term is
(Continue reading)

A. Jean Mahoney | 22 Jan 15:52 2015

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-01-22

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer          LC end       Draft
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Alexey Melnikov   2015-02-04   draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-10

Ben Campbell      2015-02-04   draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-07

Brian Carpenter   2015-02-04   draft-ietf-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-02

Tom Taylor        2015-02-13   draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05

Vijay Gurbani     2015-02-02   draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast-15

Wassim Haddad     2015-02-03   draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-12

I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,

(Continue reading)

Russ Housley | 19 Jan 18:19 2015

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

This review is in response to a request for early Gen-ART review.

Document: draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2015-01-19
IETF LC End Date: 2015-01-23
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Almost Ready.

Major Concerns:

None.

Minor Concerns:

The upper-right corner of the title page and the abstract disagree.  One
says that this document updates 3 RFCs, and the other says that it
updates 4 RFCs.  I think that both are wrong based on this text from the
introduction:

   This specification applies to implementations of TLS 1.0 [RFC2246],
   TLS 1.1 [RFC4346], and TLS 1.2 [RFC5246], and to implementations of
   DTLS 1.0 [RFC4347] and DTLS 1.2 [RFC6347].

Please correct the title page header and the abstract.
(Continue reading)

Meral Shirazipour | 19 Jan 10:20 2015
Picon

Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

 

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

 

Document: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-10

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2015-01-19

IETF LC End Date: 2014-12-25

IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22

 

 

 

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Experimental  RFC.

 

 

 

 

 

Best Regards,

Meral

---

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson

Research

www.ericsson.com

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Robert Sparks | 16 Jan 16:58 2015

Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autconfig-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-11
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 16-Jan-2015
IETF LC End Date: 20-Jan-2015
IESG Telechat date: 5-Feb-2015

Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard
Brian E Carpenter | 16 Jan 03:24 2015
Picon

Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-15.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-01-16
IETF LC End Date: 2015-01-08
IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22

Summary:   Ready
--------

Comment:
--------

Thanks for fixing my Last Call comments.

Nits:
-----

Several sets of "smart quotes" have been transformed into "?" symbols.
Brian E Carpenter | 16 Jan 03:23 2015
Picon

Gen-ART telechat review of draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05

(sorry, repeat with corrected Subject header)

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2014-10-24
IETF LC End Date: 2014-11-18
IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22

Summary:   Almost ready
--------

Comment:
--------

I am one of those who thinks this should not be on the standards track,
but rather should just be documented to describe current practice. But
that is not a Gen-ART comment.

Minor issues:
-------------

As the writeup says: "The IANA Considerations section is a bit sparse.
It should at least name the registry it's updating for convenience of the reader."
Brian E Carpenter | 16 Jan 03:02 2015
Picon

Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2014-10-24
IETF LC End Date: 2014-11-18
IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22

Summary:   Almost ready
--------

Comment:
--------

I am one of those who thinks this should not be on the standards track,
but rather should just be documented to describe current practice. But
that is not a Gen-ART comment.

Minor issues:
-------------

As the writeup says: "The IANA Considerations section is a bit sparse.
It should at least name the registry it's updating for convenience of the reader."
A. Jean Mahoney | 15 Jan 23:33 2015

Assignments for the 2015-01-22 Telechat

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer            LC end       Draft
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexey Melnikov     2015-01-07 draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-08 *

Ben Campbell        2014-12-01   draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04 **

Brian Carpenter     2014-11-18   draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05 **
Brian Carpenter     2015-01-08 draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-15 *

David Black         2015-01-14 draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10 **

Dan Romascanu       2014-12-29   draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08 **

Elwyn Davies        2015-01-14   draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16

Joel Halpern        2014-12-08 draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing-06 **

Meral Shirazipour   2014-12-25 draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-10 *
Meral Shirazipour   2015-01-14   draft-ietf-json-i-json-05 **

Roni Even           2015-01-12   draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-10 *
Roni Even           2014-12-25 draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-10 **

Vijay Gurbani       2015-01-09 draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture-15

Wassim Haddad       2014-12-01 draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-09

* Earlier draft reviewed
** Already reviewed

I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

For your convenience, the review boilerplate template is included below.

Note that reviews should ideally be posted to the gen-art mailing list
by COB on Tuesday:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
A. Jean Mahoney | 15 Jan 23:28 2015

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-01-15

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer          LC end       Draft
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Russ Housley      2015-01-23   draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03

Suresh Krishnan   2015-01-28   draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-02

I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

I've removed rows containing telechat reviews completed in 2014
from the spreadsheet and created an archive for 2014:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art_2014.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art_2014-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Gmane