Brian E Carpenter | 3 Jul 22:14 2015
Picon

Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-06.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-07-04
IETF LC End Date: 2015-07-03
IESG Telechat date: 2015-07-09

Summary:  Ready with nit
--------

Comment: Thanks for fixing my last call comments
--------

Nit:
----

The null IANA Considerations section was removed due to a misunderstanding;
the authors are aware.
A. Jean Mahoney | 2 Jul 20:41 2015

Assignments for the 2015-07-09 Telechat

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer            LC end       Draft
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Carpenter    2015-07-03   draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-06 *

Christer Holmberg  2015-06-23 draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10 **

Dan Romascanu      2015-06-24 draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-24 *

Elwyn Davies       2015-06-09   draft-ietf-6lo-btle-14 *

Francis Dupont     2015-06-29 draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03

Joel Halpern       2015-06-11   draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-06 *
Joel Halpern       2015-06-29   draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08 **

Meral Shirazipour  2015-06-11 draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-07 *

Paul Kyzivat       2015-06-29   draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-12 *

Peter Yee          2015-06-30 
draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-06 *

Russ Housley       2015-06-17   draft-ietf-tzdist-service-09 *

Robert Sparks      2015-05-18 draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07 *

(Continue reading)

A. Jean Mahoney | 2 Jul 20:19 2015

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-07-02

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer          LC end       Draft
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Elwyn Davies      2015-07-13   draft-ietf-payload-vp8-16 *

Meral Shirazipour 2015-07-16   draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-15 *

Paul Kyzivat      2015-07-10   draft-ietf-precis-nickname-17

Peter Yee         2015-07-27   draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-01

Robert Sparks     2015-07-29   draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05

Roni Even         2015-07-13   draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy-07

* 2nd LC

I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,
(Continue reading)

Paul Kyzivat | 26 Jun 23:02 2015
Picon

Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-11.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in this 
review.

For the most part my issues are with confusing and/or ambiguous language 
and under-specification. This means some clued in implementers will be 
able to create functional, interoperable, implementations. But others, 
working just from the specification, may build arguably conforming 
implementations that fail to interoperate.

I've opted not to split major and minor issues out separately, because I 
thought it better to put things in document order. But please take 
special note of my comments on sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 that highlight 
what I believe to be a true protocol errors. I did note those points I 
consider nits.

Disclaimer: I do not claim to be a security expert. The authors are 
vastly more qualified than I on security matters. So I have not tried to 
discern if there are technical security holes in this specification.

I’ll start with some general comments, and then follow with specific 
comments on particular parts of the document.

	Thanks,
	Paul Kyzivat
(Continue reading)

Peter Yee | 26 Jun 01:15 2015

Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review Date: Jun-25-2015
IETF LC End Date: Jun-30-2015
IESG Telechat date: Jul-09-2015

Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Internet
Standard, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. [Ready with
nits.]  (I'm discounting the severity of the minor issue mentioned below.)

This draft describes a DHCPv6 option used to request MPL configuration
parameter sets.

Major Issues:  None.

Minor Issues: 

Some of the parameters are described with their bit lengths, others are not.
Lengths are listed haphazardly.  Be consistent in either including them or
not.  Timer lengths are listed as n-bit integers, but this may be confusing
given that the document says "Short floating point format is used to
describe the wide range of timer values".  So, are the timer values floating
point or integer?  Is the combined implication supposed to be that the
(Continue reading)

A. Jean Mahoney | 25 Jun 22:20 2015

A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-06-25

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer          LC end       Draft
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Romascanu     2015-07-08   draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10

Francis Dupont    2015-07-08   draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07

Joel Halpern      2015-07-08   draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04

Meral Shirazipour 2015-07-09   draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-09

Tom Taylor        2015-07-03  draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases-02

I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continue reading)

Vijay K. Gurbani | 25 Jun 15:38 2015

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-02
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Jun-25-2015
IETF LC End Date: Not known
IESG Telechat date: Jun-25-2015

This document is ready as a Proposed Standard.

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  0

Thanks,

- vijay
--

-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg <at> {bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani <at> alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
Suresh Krishnan | 25 Jun 06:28 2015
Picon

Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-topologies-update-08.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before 
posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-topologies-update-08.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2015/06/25
IESG Telechat date: 2015/06/24

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, 
but I do have one comment you may wish to consider.

Minor:
   I think it would be great if the document had a section indicating 
what has changed since RFC5117. Even listing just the new topologies 
would be very useful (e.g. Something that mentions that Sections 3.2, 
3.4, 3.7 and 3.10 are new topologies). That way somebody who is already 
familiar with RFC5117 can look at the new stuff right away.

Thanks
Suresh
Robert Sparks | 25 Jun 01:19 2015

Genart LC review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-06
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 24-Jun-2015
IETF LC End Date: 2-Jul-2015
IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready with nits

 From looking at the document history and list archives, this document's 
been around for some time, and has had some editorial push already.
The unintended consequences it highlights are interesting, and it will 
be useful to operators to know these possible causes of unexpected behavior.

I encourage another strong editing pass before publication.

This is being published as an IETF-stream document. When published it 
reflects IETF consensus.
There are places in the text that I think are problematic given that 
status. The issues are editorial, and I expect they will be easy to address.

The document uses "we" frequently. Originally, that meant the authors. 
It's ambiguous what it means in an IETF-stream document. I suggest 
(Continue reading)

Wassim Haddad | 19 Jun 00:39 2015
Picon

Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-clarifications-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-clarifications-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 18 June 2015
IETF LC End Date: 17 June 2015
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
A. Jean Mahoney | 18 Jun 23:37 2015

Assignments for the 2015-06-25 Telechat

Hi all,

The following reviewers have assignments:

Reviewer            LC end       Draft
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexey Melnikov     2015-06-18 draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08

Paul Kyzivat        2015-05-18   draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-03 **

Roni Even           2015-06-12 
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot-03 **
Roni Even           2015-05-22   draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-12 *

Suresh Krishnan     2015-06-17 draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-topologies-update-08

Tom Taylor          2015-06-17 draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00 **

Vijay Gurbani       2015-06-17 
draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-explicit-subscription-02

Wassim Haddad       2015-06-17 draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-clarifications-04

* Earlier draft reviewed
** Already reviewed

I have made the assignments in the review tool:
http://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/

And the assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

For your convenience, the review boilerplate template is included below.

Note that reviews should ideally be posted to the gen-art mailing list
by COB on Tuesday:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/

Jean

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Gmane