Internet Fax (fax)

Hiroshi Tamura | 14 Jan 2003 02:04

IETF meeting in San Francisco


Folk,

Before I request our allocation for 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco,
I would like to hear your comments.

As you already know, FAX WG and VPIM WG shared the same time slot
at these two meetings. There is no more VPIM WG meeting.
Thus, I will request one-hour slot only.

Claudio and I would like San Francisco's meeting
to be the FINAL face-to-face meeting, although our ML continues.

Our remaining things to discuss technically are:
- ESMTP CONNEG
- Timely Delivery
- FFPIM
- IFAX service in ENUM 

There will be the agenda for confirmation of status of I-Ds,
such as service, tiff-fx and gateway.

If you have comments, please let us know.

Regards,
--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
E-mail: tamura <at> toda.ricoh.co.jp

(Continue reading)

headers

Larry Masinter | 14 Jan 2003 03:14

TIFF-FX issues, recap


Is it your plan that the TIFF-FX issues will be resolved
before the San Francisco meeting?

On 12/11/2002 I sent two messages with comments on TIFF-FX.

On "Technical changes since RFC 2301"
(http://www.imc.org/ietf-fax/mail-archive/msg01479.html)
there was some discussion:

   (1) Addition of image/tiff-fx MIME type

Removing the tiff-fx registration from section 9 was suggested.
I think there was some disagreement on whether to retain the
'feature' that image/tiff-fx MAY be used with profile S and F.
I'm not sure the issue is resolved.

   (2) FillOrder=1 mandatory for all readers except profile S

I don't think there was any comment on this issue. I don't
think this issue is resolved.

   (3) elimination of ColorMap for profile L

I think it was agreed that this was an allowable change if
it was actually supported by implementations. This issue
will be resolved if it is clear from the interoperability
reports that there are interoperable readers that don't require
a ColorMap.

(Continue reading)

headers

Hiroshi Tamura | 14 Jan 2003 03:36

Re: TIFF-FX issues, recap


Larry,

Thanks for your comment.

> Is it your plan that the TIFF-FX issues will be resolved
> before the San Francisco meeting?

It depends on the editors' work.
All understand there are issues to be resolved.
Even if not, I think the next meeting is the final one.
We do not have many issues.

Regards,
--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX
E-mail: tamura <at> toda.ricoh.co.jp


Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Sun

1	April 2006
4	January 2006
7	November 2005
2	September 2005
1	July 2005
1	May 2005
1	March 2005
15	February 2005
5	January 2005
6	December 2004
4	August 2004
35	July 2004
13	June 2004
2	May 2004
1	April 2004
7	March 2004
5	February 2004
2	December 2003
2	November 2003
1	September 2003
6	August 2003
16	July 2003
11	June 2003
11	May 2003
12	April 2003
9	March 2003
25	February 2003
3	January 2003
38	December 2002
28	November 2002
23	October 2002
25	September 2002
18	August 2002
214	July 2002
22	June 2002
3	May 2002
17	April 2002
53	March 2002
14	February 2002
26	January 2002
47	December 2001
28	November 2001
19	October 2001
21	September 2001
76	August 2001
61	July 2001
48	June 2001
26	May 2001
11	April 2001
152	March 2001
95	February 2001
16	January 2001
18	December 2000
44	November 2000
34	October 2000
18	September 2000
26	August 2000
58	July 2000
20	June 2000
34	May 2000
34	April 2000
61	March 2000
23	February 2000
35	January 2000
11	December 1999
12	November 1999
51	October 1999
28	September 1999
24	August 1999
22	July 1999
62	June 1999
14	May 1999
29	April 1999
64	March 1999
71	February 1999
34	January 1999
33	December 1998
64	November 1998
132	October 1998
115	September 1998
103	August 1998
289	July 1998
257	June 1998
176	May 1998
24	April 1998
104	March 1998
40	February 1998
164	January 1998
369	December 1997
248	November 1997
97	October 1997
260	September 1997
106	August 1997
116	July 1997
94	June 1997
359	May 1997
165	April 1997
61	March 1997
33	February 1997
244	January 1997
267	December 1996
159	November 1996
37	October 1996
96	September 1996
35	August 1996
6	July 1996