Re: Numbering of EAP Lower Layers Registry
Sean Turner <turners <at> ieca.com>
2011-11-18 04:35:00 GMT
On 11/15/11 2:38 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Turner<turners <at> ieca.com> writes:
> Sean> Sam, Is there a reason that the registry values aren't 1-9? I
> Sean> know there were other values there originally and they were
> Sean> dropped, just curious why they weren't renumbered.
> First, sorry for coming so late to the meeting. That was not some
> passive-agressive thing or the like, I just was sure that EMU was this
> afternoon at 1300. So I'm sorry I was not there for the discussion of
> the document I'm editing.
> I didn't renumber because I was concerned people might already be using
> these values. However, as it turns out, we haven't actually allocated
> the RADIUS AVP, so there's no way people can be using this already. I'm
> happy to renumber the registrations if people like.
I'd just go and renumber it.