headers
Joe Salowey | 8 Nov 2011 22:56
Picon
Favicon

IETF 82 agenda

THe IETF 82 EMU agenda is posted in the usual place.  Please let me know if you have any corrections.

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/agenda/emu.txt

Cheers,

Joe
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sean Turner | 15 Nov 2011 02:15

Numbering of EAP Lower Layers Registry

Sam,

Is there a reason that the registry values aren't 1-9?  I know there 
were other values there originally and they were dropped, just curious 
why they weren't renumbered.

spt
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Sam Hartman | 15 Nov 2011 07:38
Picon
Favicon

Re: Numbering of EAP Lower Layers Registry

>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Turner <turners <at> ieca.com> writes:

    Sean> Sam, Is there a reason that the registry values aren't 1-9?  I
    Sean> know there were other values there originally and they were
    Sean> dropped, just curious why they weren't renumbered.

First, sorry for coming so late to the meeting. That was not some
passive-agressive thing or the like, I just was sure that EMU was this
afternoon at 1300.  So I'm sorry I was not there for the discussion of
the document I'm editing.

I didn't renumber because I was concerned people might already be using
these values.  However, as it turns out, we haven't actually allocated
the RADIUS AVP, so there's no way people can be using this already.  I'm
happy to renumber the registrations if people like.

--Sam
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Joe Salowey | 16 Nov 2011 10:42
Picon
Favicon

IETF 82 EMU working group meeting summary

EMU met on Tuesday morning.   EAP Channel bindings (draft-ietf-emu-chbind-11) completed working group
last call and a new draft has been issued incorporating most of the comments.   There are a few open issues so
another revision will be needed before forwarding to IESG.    Open issues on the EAP tunnel method
(currently called TEAP - draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-01) were discussed.   Proposed
resolutions from the meeting will be raised on the working group list.   We had discussion on the update of
the EAP applicability statement in draft-winter-abfab-eapapplicability-01which is currently a
charter item in the ABFAB working group.  There is some question on whether this work should be done in EMU or
ABFAB as the document will need review from both ABFAB and EMU and other groups such a
 s NEA.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jim Schaad | 18 Nov 2011 01:05

Channel Bindings Document

I should probably read it when I am not so tired and distracted, however I
believe that all of my issues have been addressed in the last version

Jim
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sean Turner | 18 Nov 2011 05:35

Re: Numbering of EAP Lower Layers Registry

On 11/15/11 2:38 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Turner<turners <at> ieca.com>  writes:
>
>      Sean>  Sam, Is there a reason that the registry values aren't 1-9?  I
>      Sean>  know there were other values there originally and they were
>      Sean>  dropped, just curious why they weren't renumbered.
>
> First, sorry for coming so late to the meeting. That was not some
> passive-agressive thing or the like, I just was sure that EMU was this
> afternoon at 1300.  So I'm sorry I was not there for the discussion of
> the document I'm editing.
>
>
> I didn't renumber because I was concerned people might already be using
> these values.  However, as it turns out, we haven't actually allocated
> the RADIUS AVP, so there's no way people can be using this already.  I'm
> happy to renumber the registrations if people like.

I'd just go and renumber it.

spt
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane