6 Dec 2004 17:31
Heads up: standards spring cleaning
Dave Crocker <dcrocker <at> brandenburg.com>
2004-12-06 16:31:31 GMT
2004-12-06 16:31:31 GMT
Rik, Just to make sure the IETF's EDI community knows about this. Note that RFC1767, "MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects" is on the list. d/ --- Original Message --- > >Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:49:54 +0100 > >From: Eliot Lear <lear <at> cisco.com> > >To: drums <at> cs.utk.edu, lemonade <at> ietf.org, discuss <at> apps.ietf.org > >Subject: standards spring cleaning > > > >Good day, > > > >I am currently involved in an experimental process to see what it > >would take to hold to the notion that Proposed and Draft Standards > >shouldn't stay in that state forever. There are a number of mail > >related standards that fall into this category, and I wonder if > >people can tell me whether the list of standards below (or any > >others on the broader list) should stay or go. The original list > >was generated programmatically by looking for proposed standards > >below RFC 2000 that are not obsoleted (we'll do draft later). > > > >Here they are: > > > >RFC1421 Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part > >I: Message Encryption and Authentication Procedures > >RFC1422 Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part(Continue reading)
The RFC1767, MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects, is the basis for the EDIINT
workgroup set of standards. It is basic to rfc3335 and others. Rfc3335 is
used by over a hundred thousand business across the world to support b2b
commerce. Rate of implementation is accelerating.
Please do not make it historic.
Best regards, rik drummond - Chair EDIINT WG
RSS Feed