headers
Zafar Ali (zali | 1 Dec 2006 05:22
Picon
Favicon

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 
No, IMO transferring the ownership and control of an existing and in-use Data Plane connection between the Management Plane and the Control Plane is over-engineering.
 
 
Yes,  
 
 
Yes,  
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
JP Vasseur | 1 Dec 2006 13:37
Picon
Favicon

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,

On Nov 30, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS wrote:

Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 


Yes

 
 

Yes (I'm a co-author).

Thanks.

JP.

Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Pandian, Vijay | 1 Dec 2006 16:19
Favicon

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

 
Yes. In my opinion, if we believe in the usefulness of the Control Plane in a transport network, this draft addresses a very important problem that helps migration of legacy networks.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 
 
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dean Cheng (dcheng | 1 Dec 2006 18:11
Picon
Favicon

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

Yes to all.
 
Dean

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:23 PM
To: ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 
 
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Adrian Farrel | 1 Dec 2006 18:26
Picon

Lucent/Alcatel changes in email addresses

Hi,

If your email address is changing, don't forget to update your subscription 
to the mailing lists.

Adrian
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Richard Rabbat | 1 Dec 2006 18:48
Picon
Favicon

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

yes to all
richard

On 12/1/06, Dean Cheng (dcheng) <dcheng <at> cisco.com> wrote:
Yes to all.
 
Dean

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:23 PM
To: ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs
Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 
 
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ong, Lyndon | 2 Dec 2006 03:56

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi Folks,
 
I agree with Zafar on this.  No, Yes and Yes.
 
Cheers,
 
Lyndon

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zafar Ali (zali)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:23 PM
To: Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS; ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 
No, IMO transferring the ownership and control of an existing and in-use Data Plane connection between the Management Plane and the Control Plane is over-engineering.
 
 
Yes,  
 
 
Yes,  
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Igor Bryskin | 2 Dec 2006 14:35
Picon
Favicon

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

Yes to all three.

Igor

"Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong <at> Ciena.com> wrote:

Hi Folks,
 
I agree with Zafar on this.  No, Yes and Yes.
 
Cheers,
 
Lyndon

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zafar Ali (zali)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:23 PM
To: Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS; ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs

From: owner-ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp <at> ops.i etf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,
 
As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:
 
 
No, IMO transferring the ownership and control of an existing and in-use Data Plane connection between the Management Plane and the Control Plane is over-engineering.
  div>
 
Yes,  
 
 
Yes,  
 
Please send yes or no for these IDs.
 
Reasons and opinions are also welcome.
 
Thanks,
Deborah and Adrian

Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Miya Kohno (mkohno | 3 Dec 2006 18:39
Picon
Favicon

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

> Hi,
>
>As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG
drafts:
......
		 
>		2.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interw
ork-reqts-02.txt
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-inte
rwork-reqts-02.txt>  
>		 

Yes.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Peng He | 3 Dec 2006 23:17
Picon

Re: Polling for new WG IDs

For the first one,  I also agree with Zafar.  No,

For the second and the third one, Yes and Yes.

Regards,
Peng

On 12/3/06, Miya Kohno (mkohno) <mkohno <at> cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG
> drafts:
> ......
>
> >               2.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interw
> ork-reqts-02.txt
> ><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-inte
> rwork-reqts-02.txt>
> >
>
> Yes.
>
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane