Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt
Tom Petch <nwnetworks <at> dial.pipex.com>
2005-10-06 10:36:06 GMT
I am still unsure about MSB/LSB in IANAGmplsAdminStatusFlags. This has reflect
(31) while RFC3471 has reflect as bit 0.
As Joan says, "The BITS as specified look backwards when viewing the TLV".
This is fine if one is MSB, the other LSB (although that might be worth adding a
----- Original Message -----
From: <jcucchiara <at> mindspring.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian <at> olddog.co.uk>; <tnadeau <at> cisco.com>;
<ccamp <at> ops.ietf.org>
Cc: <bwijnen <at> lucent.com>; <jcucchiara <at> mindspring.com>
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt
> hi Adrian,
> Please see comments inline below, I have snipped parts where we
> are in agreement.
> thanks, joan