headers
Mihai BADEA | 19 Dec 2005 10:19

Re: Quick Question (aka "yearly w / bymonthday or byday. Please Clarify!")


well seems to me that one should interpret his own way the ambiguous
parts of the rfc...
by the way.. is this forum closed?

Mihai BADEA wrote:

>Hello folks,
>
>This is an older message which I think offers a wrong interpretation of
>the recurrence rules BYDAY and BYMONTHDAY in a YEARLY recurrence when
>BYMONTH is missing. I am surprised that the thread had only three
>messages (2 times the quetion and one final answer, and none following
>comments from anyone).
>
>Vinod_Seraphin/CAM/Lotus <at> lotus.com wrote:
>  
>
>>>DTSTART:19970501T090000-0400
>>>RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTHDAY=1,20
>>>
>>>be interpreted as
>>>1) Every May on Days 1 and 20 at 9:00:00
>>>or
>>>2) Every Month on Days 1 and 20 at 9:00:00?
>>>
>>>In other words should DTSTART's month be considered a BYMONTH value in
>>>      
>>>
>>this
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 501 comments |
headers
Doug Royer | 21 Dec 2005 20:43

[Fwd: RFC 4324 on Calendar Access Protocol (CAP)]


CAP is out !!

Thanks EVERYONE for their help!!

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RFC 4324 on Calendar Access Protocol (CAP)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:10:43 -0800
From: rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org
To: ietf-announce <at> ietf.org
CC: rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

         RFC 4324

         Title:      Calendar Access Protocol (CAP)
         Author(s):  D. Royer, G. Babics, S. Mansour
         Status:     Experimental
         Date:       December 2005
         Mailbox:    Doug <at> IntelliCal.com, george.babics <at> oracle.com,
                     smansour <at> ebay.com
         Pages:      131
         Characters: 254638
         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:    None

         I-D Tag:    draft-royer-calsch-cap-03.txt

         URL:        ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4324.txt
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane