MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 3 Mar 21:23 2015
Picon

WG ADOPTION: dcbench-def and dcbench-methodology

BMWG,

We've been discussing a draft for Data Center Benchmarking
for some time.

Our new charter includes Data Center Benchmarking, so we ask
everyone to take a look (by March 18th) 
and express comments/support.

The latest drafts are here:

          http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dcbench-def-02.txt
          http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-03.txt

regards,
Al
bmwg co-chair
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 3 Mar 21:19 2015
Picon

WG ADOPTION: draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-

BMWG,

We've been discussing a draft for Benchmarking Neighbor Discovery
for some time.

Our new charter includes IPv6ND, so we ask
everyone to take a look (by March 18th) 
and express comments/support.

The latest draft is here:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-06

regards,
Al
bmwg co-chair
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 28 Feb 21:55 2015
Picon

draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd

Hi Bill and Ron,

I made some time to read your latest update on a plane ride.
This draft seems to have a few areas for further
development, but otherwise in very good shape.

I attach my comments,
Al
(as a participant)

  




Network Working Group                                         W. Cerveny
Internet-Draft                                            Arbor Networks
Intended status: Informational                                 R. Bonica
Expires: July 8, 2015                                   Juniper Networks
                                                         January 4, 2015


                    Benchmarking Neighbor Discovery
                     draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-06

Abstract

   This document is a benchmarking instantiation of RFC 6583:
(Continue reading)

MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 26 Feb 18:00 2015
Picon

FW: New Version Notification for draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-03.txt

Hi BMWG,

I updated this draft in the following areas:

>    3.4 Added inter-actions/dependencies within resource domains
> 
>    4.3 Added new metrics for characterization: PDV, reordering, mean
>    delay, etc.
> 
>    4.4 Resolved the question of capacity and the 3x3 Matrix
>

and have circulated it in several relevant fora
(OPNFV and ETSI NFV). Comments welcome.

regards,
Al
(as author/participant)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts <at> ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 3:05 PM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-03.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-03.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Al Morton and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 23 Feb 18:43 2015
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-03.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Benchmarking Methodology Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Traffic Management Benchmarking
        Authors         : Barry Constantine
                          Ram Krishnan
	Filename        : draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-03.txt
	Pages           : 40
	Date            : 2015-02-23

Abstract:
   This framework describes a practical methodology for benchmarking the
   traffic management capabilities of networking devices (i.e. policing,
   shaping, etc.). The goal is to provide a repeatable test method that
   objectively compares performance of the device's traffic management
   capabilities and to specify the means to benchmark traffic management
   with representative application traffic.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-03

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
(Continue reading)

MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 5 Feb 01:17 2015
Picon

First WGLC on draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth

BMWG:

A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on
In Service Software Upgrade Benchmarking:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth-05

will be open from 4 February 2015 through 5 March 2015.

Please note that this draft *has* been adopted by the working group
as indicated in our minutes from IETF-91:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-bmwg
The filename has not been modified yet, but let's not stand on ceremony
and complete the technical review instead. The next revision will fix
names.

This draft is beginning the BMWG Last Call Process. See
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html

Please read and express your opinion on whether or not this
Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
publication as an Informational RFC.  Send your comments
to this list or acmorton <at> att.com 

Al
bmwg co-chair
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 5 Feb 01:07 2015
Picon

Third WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management


BMWG (and AQM):

A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on
Traffic Management Benchmarking:

   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management

will be open from 4 February 2015 through 19 February 2015.

Please note that the RFC diff for this version indicates the 
introduction of many new instances of RFC 2119 Requirements Language:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-02
Past reviewers should check the current draft and indicate their 
current opinion or support.

The second WGLC (on -01) closed on 6 January, 2015 with substantial 
comments and the authors believe they are now addressed.

The first WGLC (on -00) closed October 21 2014, with substantial 
comments.

This draft is continuing the BMWG Last Call Process. See
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html

Please read and express your opinion on whether or not this
Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
publication as an Informational RFC.  Send your comments
to this list or acmorton <at> att.com and sbanks <at> encrypted.net

(Continue reading)

The IESG | 3 Feb 22:46 2015
Picon

Document Action: 'Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic session setup and registration' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-12.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
   Devices: Basic session setup and registration'
  (draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-12.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term/

Technical Summary

All networking devices have a limited capacity to serve their purpose.
In some cases these limits can be ascertained by counting physical
features (e.g., interface card slots), but in other cases standardized
tests are required to be sure that all vendors count their
protocol-handling capacity in the same way, to avoid specmanship. This
draft addresses one such case, where the SIP session-serving capacity
of a device can only be discovered and rigorously compared with other
devices through isolated laboratory testing.

This document describes the methodology for benchmarking Session -or-
This document describes the terminology for benchmarking Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP) performance as described in SIP benchmarking
terminology document. The methodology and terminology are to be used
for benchmarking signaling plane performance with varying signaling
and media load. Both scale and establishment rate are measured by
(Continue reading)

IETF Secretariat | 2 Feb 21:11 2015
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-05.txt>

IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence/
IETF Secretariat | 2 Feb 21:06 2015
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-05.txt>

IANA action state changed to No IC
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence/
IETF Secretariat | 2 Feb 21:06 2015
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-05.txt>

IANA action state changed to In Progress
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence/

Gmane