Picon

bmwg - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96


A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Sarah Banks, a Chair of the bmwg working group.

---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Benchmarking Methodology
Area Name: Operations and Management Area
Session Requester: Sarah Banks

Number of Sessions: 1
Length of Session(s):  2.5 Hours
Number of Attendees: 30
Conflicts to Avoid: 
 First Priority: aqm ippm lmap ntp idr tsvwg tictoc sfc sdnrg nfvrg
 Second Priority: Irtfopen xrblock tsvarea

Special Requests:
   Much better attendance and participation/recruiting when session NOT on Friday
---------------------------------------------------------
Sarah B | 25 Apr 17:52 2016
Picon

Minutes from IETF95

Hello BMWG,
	First, a huge thanks to Marius who took pristine notes for us at IETF95. This is in addition to being remote,
where just being remote can be the hindrance. Thank you Marius!
	Please find the minutes from IETF95 here: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-bmwg
	Please send me any errata or comments or questions you have.

Thanks
Sarah & Al
Ger, Javier | 7 Apr 20:03 2016
Picon

draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark

Hi Bhuvan,

 

I was wondering if defining more precisely what DoS attacks mean makes sense. Although there are several DoS attack types, based in the document content I assume it is referring to volumetric attacks, so it could be useful to include this clarification in the “term” draft.

 

Additionally, if my previous assumption is true, I was also wondering if having a clear baseline or values related to DoS attacks can help (basically would allow running different tests consistently and avoid misinterpretations). Since the increased amount of requests (packets/traffic/sessions/etc.) is the typical behavior of the volumetric DoS attacks, in the “meth” draft you could include some value in order to define when you are considering that a certain volume of these requests mean a volumetric DoS attack is ongoing.

 

Probably giving just one fixed value can be difficult because it will vary from one controller to another (in fact depending of their performance). But perhaps a table including a list/group of them or even some relative values based in what you have already measured about the controller performance in the first part of the procedure can give some kind of curve or ramp about how each value of illegitimate requests affects performance until the controller goes off.

 

Regards.

Visite https://www.cablevisionfibertel.com.ar
__________________________________________
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacion amparada por el secreto comercial.
Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error, debera eliminarlo de su sistema.
No debera copiar el mensaje ni divulgar su contenido a ninguna persona.
Muchas gracias.
This message is confidential. It may also contain information that is privileged or not authorized to be disclosed. If you have received it by mistake, delete it from your system.
You should not copy the messsage nor disclose its contents to anyone.
Many thanks.
__________________________________________

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
joel jaeggli | 7 Apr 15:24 2016

rfc 7747 auth48 changes. - was draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-05

It's been a pretty long time on this draft given the misref status.

The final scrub of the document has some significant editorial changes
which the wg should peruse it is here:

http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7747-lastdiff.html

differentiation between tcp md5 and tcp ao being an important and
siginficant change.

joel

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
internet-drafts | 5 Apr 16:40 2016
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-02.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Benchmarking Methodology of the IETF.

        Title           : Benchmarking IPv6 Neighbor Cache Behavior
        Authors         : William Cerveny
                          Ron Bonica
	Filename        : draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-02.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2016-04-05

Abstract:
   This document is a benchmarking instantiation of RFC 6583:
   "Operational Neighbor Discovery Problems" [RFC6583].  It describes a
   general testing procedure and measurements that can be performed to
   evaluate how the problems described in RFC 6583 may impact the
   functionality or performance of intermediate nodes.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-02

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 2 Apr 23:39 2016
Picon

FW: [95attendees] Workshop on Internet Measurement Standardization at the IETF (April 3rd, 9:00 AM, Hilton BA)

BMWG,

I just found this message (because I filter the attendees list ;-/ ),
and although this is intended for local folks attending
IETF for the first time, all who are here are welcome!
(registration is required) 
The original plan was that many of the talks would be 
in Spanish, but mine will not be.

hasta la vista,
Al

-----Original Message-----
From: 95attendees [mailto:95attendees-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fernando Gont
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 12:57 AM
To: 95attendees <at> ietf.org
Subject: [95attendees] Workshop on Internet Measurement Standardization at the IETF (April 3rd, 9:00
AM, Hilton BA)

Folks,

This hasn't been announced here, so: <https://wimsi.si6networks.com>


** Workshop on Internet Measurement Standardization at the IETF **
**           April 3rd, 2016. Buenos Aires, Argentina           **
**        Chair: Marcelo Bagnulo <marcelo <at> it.uc3m.es>           **

About

The Workshop on Internet Measurement Standardization at the IETF will
provide an opportunity to approach IETF measurement standardization.

Attendance

Attendance to this workshop is open and free, but you need to register
beforehand here:
<https://www.eventbrite.com/e/workshop-on-internet-measurement-standardization-at-the-ietf-tickets-24309268677>.


Confirmed talks

* Designing Privacy into Internet Protocols -- Juan Carlos Zuniga
* Large-scale measurements: use cases and the LMAP framework -- Philip
  Eardley (BT’s Networks Research team)
* Informing Protocol Design Through Crowdsourcing: the Case of
  Pervasive Encryption -- Marcelo Bagnulo (UC3M)
* Benchmarking Performance of Virtual Network Functions (VNF) -- Al
  Morton (AT&T)
* IPv6 Extension Headers in the Real World -- Fernando Gont (SI6
  Networks)
* Measurements at LACNIC -- Agustin Formoso (LACNIC)


More info, details, etc. available at: <https://wimsi.si6networks.com>


Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando <at> gont.com.ar || fgont <at> si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1



_______________________________________________
95attendees mailing list
95attendees <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL | 2 Apr 19:12 2016
Picon

Remote participation

BMWG,

During IETF-95, it's possible to participate remotely
using Meetecho and ask questions in a virtual queue.
However, the usual remote features, jabber and audio
will continue to be available.

To use Meetecho, you must register as a remote participant
(free) and below is the link for that operation:

http://ietf.org/meeting/95/remote-participation.html

Bear with us as we navigate this new meeting feature.

Al and Sarah
bmwg co-chairs
Sarah B | 23 Mar 16:46 2016
Picon

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vsperf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv

Hello BWWG,
According to the minutes from IETF94 (https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/minutes/minutes-94-bmwg), those present in the room expressed interest in the draft. There've been several reviewers, and strong discussion during each IETF meeting since the draft was introduced. As Al is a named author, I'd like to, with my chair hat on, ask the BMWG list to confirm their support for this draft and call for adoption. 

Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt this draft, whether you have read the draft, and any comments on the draft or this call for adoption. Let's attempt to complete this call for adoption and meet a deadline of April 20th, 2016.

Kind regards,
Sarah
BMWG Co-Chair
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
Sarah B | 23 Mar 16:39 2016
Picon

First WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net

Hello BMWG,

A working group last call period for the Internet-Drafts on "Considerations for Benchmarking Virtual Network Functions and Their Infrastructure":

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-02

will be open from 23 March 2016 through 20 April 2016.

If the Editors update the drafts before the IETF-95 submission deadline, the WGLC will extend to the new versions.

This draft is beginning the BMWG Last Call Process. See http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html for more information.

Please read and express your opinion on whether or not these Internet-Drafts should be forwarded to the Area Directors for publication as Informational RFCs.  Send your comments to this list or to the co-chairs acmorton <at> att.com and sbanks <at> encrypted.net.

For the co-chairs,
Sarah
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
IETF Secretariat | 22 Mar 15:29 2016
Picon

Milestones changed for bmwg WG

Changed milestone "Draft on VNF Benchmarking Considerations to IESG
Review", reverted to not being resolved.

URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/bmwg/charter/
Bhuvan (Veryx Technologies | 22 Mar 11:33 2016

Request for your comments on SDN Controller Benchmarking Drafts

Dear BMWG & SDNRG members,

 

Thank you very much for providing your valuable comments and support for this work. We have updated the draft about SDN Controller benchmarking addressing comments received in the mailing list. The latest drafts can be found here:

 

draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-01

draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-01

 

Summary of Changes – Terminology Document:

1.       Removed a few terminologies ( e.g., SDN Nodes etc.,) that are already defined in RFC 7426 and added references for that RFC. The is based on feedback from Al Morton, Adrian and Mohamed Boucadair

2.       Added test setup information based on Scott’s feedback

 

Summary of Changes – Methodology Document:

1.           Added requirements for Test Emulator and added some texts for test repeatability. This is based on feedback from Scott, Al and Doug Montgomery.

 

### We are still considering a solution for comments received from Marius G about summarizing test results in terms of Average vs Median .

 

We would love to hear any further comments/queries on these drafts.

 

Thanks,

Authors

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

Gmane