10 Apr 2007 18:03
Re: Proposed Errata for RFC 4319
Clay Sikes <csikes <at> tampabay.rr.com>
2007-04-10 16:03:59 GMT
2007-04-10 16:03:59 GMT
Menachem and Michael,
Back in January 2007, I proposed an errata for RFC 4319. The proposal
has not been implemented. Do you want this to move forward? If so,
please let Bob Braden (braden <at> ISI.EDU) know or if there is something
else that I need to do, please let me know.
The proposal follows.
The word "UNVERIFIED" needs to be removed from Alfred Hines' 18, January
2006 errata statement.
Section 2.7, page 11, second bullet, last paragraph
The index value for this profile is a locally-unique
Should be:
The index value for these profiles is a locally-unique
Page 15, Revision December 7, 2005, description text
2. Modified all rates such that their rates are only
Should be:
2. Modified all rates such that they are only
Page 16, Hdsl2ShdslPerfCurrDayCount, second paragraph in the description
Hdsl2Shdsl1DayIntevalCount, and the current interval gauge
Should be:
Hdsl2Shdsl1DayIntervalCount, and the current interval gauge
(Continue reading)
RSS Feed