headers
Menachem.Dodge | 1 Mar 2006 15:53

Cancelled: Adslmib WG meeting at 65th IETF Meeting

Hello All,

      After another check of the expected attendance at the working group
meeting, I have found it necessary to cancel the meeting
and apologize for any inconvenience that this may cause.

The information that would have been presented at the meeting will still be
made available on the mailing list, and still targeted for the meeting
date.

I thank the editors for there, on-going, hard work in preparing the
materials.

Best Regards,
Menachem Dodge
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Polyakov Artem | 6 Mar 2006 07:31
Picon

shdsl MIB

Hello, sorry for my english.
I am interest in SHDSL MIB.
The question is: why this MIB don't support ANNEX F mode?
Best regards, Artem ( Sigrand LLC )
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Clay Sikes | 6 Mar 2006 21:46

Re: shdsl MIB

Hi Artem,

I hope that you are referring to the MIB module defined in RFC 3276.  
This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 4319 which increases the rates to 
4,294,967,295 bps which should be enough to support the 5,696,000 bps 
rate in Annex F. 

I'm not aware of any lack of Annex F support in RFC 4319.

Best Regards,
Clay Sikes

On 3/6/2006 1:31 AM, Polyakov Artem wrote:

>Hello, sorry for my english.
>I am interest in SHDSL MIB.
>The question is: why this MIB don't support ANNEX F mode?
>Best regards, Artem ( Sigrand LLC )
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Adslmib mailing list
>Adslmib <at> ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
>  
>

-- Paradyne Mail --
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Menachem.Dodge | 12 Mar 2006 10:58

Liaison from the DSL Forum

Hi,

      I am forwarding the Liaison that was received from the DSL Forum
Operations and Network Management Working Group.

      As reference is made in the liaison to TR-090, I have attached this
as well.

Best Regards,
Menachem.

----- Forwarded by Menachem Dodge/ECI Telecom on 12/03/2006 11:36 -----

             "Peter Adams"                                                 
             <p.f.adams <at> btopen                                             
             world.com>                                                 To 
                                       <Menachem.Dodge <at> ecitele.com>        
             10/03/2006 00:33                                           cc 

                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re:  IETF Adslmib WG has begun      
                                       Development of a VDSL2 MIB          

Dear Mr Dodge,

Thankyou for letting me know what the IETF is doing with respect to a MIB
for DSL.  I put your e-mail into the DSL Forum as a formal liaison and at
our recent meeting in Vienna the attached liaison was produced to inform
you
of the progress in the Forum in this area and of our future timescales.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Menachem.Dodge | 12 Mar 2006 11:29

Re: IETF Adslmib WG has begun Development of a VDSL2 MIB

Dear Mr. Adams,

        Thank you kindly for your email and the attached liaison document.

        We look forward to receiving the working text (WT-129) after your
May meeting.

Best Regards,
Menachem Dodge
IETF ADSL Mib Working Group Co-Chair.

                                                                           
             "Peter Adams"                                                 
             <p.f.adams <at> btopen                                             
             world.com>                                                 To 
                                       <Menachem.Dodge <at> ecitele.com>        
             10/03/2006 00:33                                           cc 

                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re:  IETF Adslmib WG has begun      
                                       Development of a VDSL2 MIB          

Dear Mr Dodge,

Thankyou for letting me know what the IETF is doing with respect to a MIB
for DSL.  I put your e-mail into the DSL Forum as a formal liaison and at
our recent meeting in Vienna the attached liaison was produced to inform
you
of the progress in the Forum in this area and of our future timescales.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Polyakov Artem | 14 Mar 2006 07:27
Picon

(no subject)

Hi all!
question: hdsl2ShdslSpanConfNumRepeaters: who set this walue and how
( is it result of visual examination of shdsl line ?)
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Moti.Morgenstern | 15 Mar 2006 12:23

Re: (no subject)

Artern,

The parameter hdsl2ShdslSpanConfNumRepeaters is set by the operator based
on his records regarding to the span architecture.

The parameter is used for example in order to attach alarm profiles for the
repeaters. You should know in advance how many repeaters are there.

Of course, it is possible that the operator was wrong and a different
number of repeaters are discovered along the span. In such a case there
will be a (mismatch) notification to the operator.

Best Regards,
Moti Morgenstern

ECI Telecom Ltd.
Broadband Access Division
30 Hasivim St.
Petach Tikva, Israel 49517
www.ecitele.com

                                                                           
             Polyakov Artem                                                
             <art <at> sigrand.ru>                                              
                                                                        To 
             14/03/2006 08:27          adslmib <at> ietf.org                    
                                                                        cc 

             Please respond to                                     Subject 
              art <at> sigrand.ru           [Adslmib] (no subject)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Wijnen, Bert (Bert | 19 Mar 2006 06:44
Picon
Favicon

AD review: draft-ietf-adslmib-adsl2-06.txt

Thanks for revision 6.

I think it is fine to issue an IETF Last Call now.
And then consider the remaining comments I have below
as initial IETF LC comments. You can then do a new rev
at the end of IETF LC or possibly wait to see if IESG
has any firtehr comments and address those at the same
time. I will leave it up to Dan how he wants to handle 
that.

If you all (Authors, WG chair and Dan) agree, then 
I will request IETF LC this week.

FOr remining comments see inline below

W.r.t.
> 
> - I see:
>    Adsl2ConfPmsForce ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>       STATUS      current
>       DESCRIPTION
>          "Attributes with this syntax are configuration parameters
>           that reference the desired power management state for the
>           ADSL/ADSL2 or ADSL2+ link:
>             l3toL0 (1)         - Perform a transition from L3 to L0
>                                  (Full power management state)
> 
>             l0toL2 (2)         - Perform a transition from L0 to L2
>                                  (Low power management state)
>             l0orL2toL3 (3)     - Perform a transition into L3 (Idle
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Menachem.Dodge | 19 Mar 2006 10:39

Re: AD review: draft-ietf-adslmib-adsl2-06.txt

Hello Bert,

      Thank you kindly for your review.

      I agree and would be pleased if the document can be sent to IETF Last
Call now and then handle your comments and any
additional ones at the end of the last call.

Best Regards,
Menachem.

                                                                           
             "Wijnen, Bert                                                 
             (Bert)"                                                       
             <bwijnen <at> lucent.c                                          To 
             om>                       Moti.Morgenstern <at> ecitele.com,       
                                       Menachem.Dodge <at> ecitele.com          
             19/03/2006 07:44                                           cc 
                                       "Adslmib (E-mail)"                  
                                       <adslmib <at> ietf.org>, "'Ray, Robert'" 
                                       <RobertRay <at> pesa.com>, "Dan          
                                       Romascanu (E-mail)"                 
                                       <dromasca <at> avaya.com>                
                                                                   Subject 
                                       AD review:                          
                                       draft-ietf-adslmib-adsl2-06.txt     

Thanks for revision 6.

I think it is fine to issue an IETF Last Call now.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Moti.Morgenstern | 19 Mar 2006 12:36

Re: AD review: draft-ietf-adslmib-adsl2-06.txt

Hello Bert,

I wish to thank you for your good comments.
I also wish to show a hand in favor the suggested process which will allow
us gather more comments and then produce a version that addresses all of
them.

Best Regards,
Moti

__________________

Hello Bert,

      Thank you kindly for your review.

      I agree and would be pleased if the document can be sent to IETF Last
Call now and then handle your comments and any
additional ones at the end of the last call.

Best Regards,
Menachem.

                                                                           
             "Wijnen, Bert                                                 
             (Bert)"                                                       
             <bwijnen <at> lucent.c                                          To 
             om>                       Moti.Morgenstern <at> ecitele.com,       
                                       Menachem.Dodge <at> ecitele.com          
             19/03/2006 07:44                                           cc
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane