headers
Bob Ray | 2 Dec 2002 15:33

Profile indexing

Whatever the decision amongst the cognoscenti, I'll abide by it.

Regards,
Bob Ray
PESA Switching Systems
Permalink | Reply | 15 comments |
headers
Faye Ly | 6 Dec 2002 02:52
Picon
Favicon

Re: Profile indexing-a suggestion

Mike,

Point well taken.  But I think we want to use SnmpAdminString as the index 
of the VDSL profile table following the same convention as ADSL and HDSL 
MIBs.  Is this correct?

Best,

-faye

>From: "Michael Sneed" <sneedmike <at> hotmail.com>
>To: fayely98 <at> hotmail.com
>CC: adslmib <at> ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Profile indexing-a suggestion
>Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:00:08 -0500
>
>
>
>See comments inline.
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Faye Ly" <fayely98 <at> hotmail.com>
>>To: sneedmike <at> hotmail.com, Moti.Morgenstern <at> inoviatele.com
>>CC: adslmib <at> ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Profile indexing-a suggestion
>>Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:49:04 -0800
>>
>>Mike,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 22 comments |
headers
Michael Sneed | 19 Dec 2002 02:55
Picon
Favicon

Profile indexing one more time


After much discussion it appears to me that 1) the profile indexing issue 
has 2 workable solutions 2) the weight of discussion has been in favor or 
sticking with a string based index as used in the other MIBs produced by 
this WG.   This seems to qualify as rough consensus by the working group to 
modify the VDSLMIB to use string indices for the profiles, even though I 
know there are a number of WG members that prefer the integer indices.  If 
anyone thinks this WILL NOT WORK, or has a MAJOR objection, then please 
speak up immediately.  Otherwise I believe we all want to move on with what 
we hope will be the final draft, and the editors will produce a new draft 
with string indices.

Regards,

Mike

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane