Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7046, 7059-7073
Kerim Aydin <kerim <at> u.washington.edu>
2011-06-02 19:04:04 GMT
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods <at> googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Honestly, I feel like it should trigger whenever there's no way to
> > change the blah blah blah /that most players know of/.
> How pragmatic.
Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is a Nomic) by appending:
Upon a judicial finding, not appealed for 2 weeks, that a specified
game change that took effect in the 2 weeks preceding the CFJ has
made it practically IMPOSSIBLE to make or adopt such rule changes/
proposals in this time frame by any remotely reasonable method,
that change is so cancelled. Such a finding is appropriate if and
only if the specified game change that would be cancelled is
specified clearly, unambiguously, and as minimally as reasonably
possible to remove the impossibility.
[The Platonic cancellation is still there in 1st paragraph as a
failsafe if judicial system breaks too. This pragmatic version
includes some boundaries for reasonableness; e.g. if a rule change
could happen by requiring everyone to deregister, maybe that's a
wholly unreasonable (not remotely reasonable) method].