3 Mar 2011 19:10
3 Mar 2011 19:21
DIS: Re: BUS: blah
Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-03 18:21:45 GMT
2011-03-03 18:21:45 GMT
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com> wrote: > I deputize for the Assessor to publish the following: Disclaimer: I have no idea whatsoever if the office of the Assessor is actually vacant; this may have failed.
3 Mar 2011 19:46
DIS: Re: BUS: 80-pickup
Sean Hunt <scshunt <at> csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
2011-03-03 18:46:57 GMT
2011-03-03 18:46:57 GMT
On 11-03-03 01:26 PM, omd wrote: > I deputise for the Promotor to distribute the following proposal (from > last month). The matter to be decided is whether to adopt it; the set > of eligible voters is the set of active first-class players at the > time of this message; the options available are FOR and AGAINST; the > vote collector is the Assessor, i.e. no one. AGAINST x seventy billion -scshunt
3 Mar 2011 20:09
DIS: Re: BUS: blah
Jonathan Rouillard <jonathan.rouillard <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-03 19:09:03 GMT
2011-03-03 19:09:03 GMT
Yeah, I was wondering why I wasn't listed here even though I /did/
vote on that Proposal... =P
~ Roujo
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> I deputize for the Assessor to publish the following:
>>
>> {{
>>
>> Voting results for Proposal 6961:
>>
>> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
>> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
>> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
>>
>> *6961 D1 3.0 G. 52-pickup v2
>>
>> 6961
>>
>> BobTHJ A
>> ehird F
>> G. F
>> Murphy P
>> Tiger F
>
> CoE: This definitely failed, as Roujo isn't Tiger.
>
(Continue reading)
4 Mar 2011 00:01
DIS: Re: BUS: intent to deputize
omd <c.ome.xk <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-03 23:01:52 GMT
2011-03-03 23:01:52 GMT
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com> wrote: > I intend to deputize for the Registrar to publish eir weekly report. Pseudo-CoE: This is too vague. There are multiple documents that would satisfy the Registrar's requirement to publish a weekly report.
4 Mar 2011 01:02
DIS: Re: BUS: 80-pickup
Roger Hicks <pidgepot <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-04 00:02:32 GMT
2011-03-04 00:02:32 GMT
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 16:48, Sean Hunt <scshunt <at> csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On 11-03-03 03:58 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>
>> I vote AGAINST proposal 6962.
>>
>> Then I vote AGAINST proposal 6962 another thousand billion times for
>> good measure.
>
> I do everything in the quoted message.
>
> Then I do it another thousand billion times for extra-good measure.
>
Faux-Proposal: To B or not to B
{
Select a date a random within the past XXX days. The ruleset becomes
equivalent to the ruleset believed by most B players at the time to be
in effect in B Nomic at 00:00 on the chosen date.
}
BobTHJ
4 Mar 2011 01:59
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 80-pickup
Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-04 00:59:31 GMT
2011-03-04 00:59:31 GMT
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Faux-Proposal: To B or not to B
> {
> Select a date a random within the past XXX days. The ruleset becomes
> equivalent to the ruleset believed by most B players at the time to be
> in effect in B Nomic at 00:00 on the chosen date.
> }
Counter-proposal: the ruleset is set to the ruleset believed by most B
players to be in effect in Nomicron at the chosen date.
4 Mar 2011 05:26
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Proposal 6959 Results
Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-04 04:26:22 GMT
2011-03-04 04:26:22 GMT
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42 <at> socal.rr.com> wrote: > ais523 wrote: >> I nominate Murphy for Assessor. > > I become active and accept this nomination. As far as I can tell, no election was ever initiated for this office; this nomination was ineffective.
4 Mar 2011 17:29
DIS: Re: BUS: End of game
omd <c.ome.xk <at> gmail.com>
2011-03-04 16:29:02 GMT
2011-03-04 16:29:02 GMT
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Sean Hunt <scshunt <at> csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > On 11-03-04 01:28 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Proposal: End the Game (AI = 3): >> >> There is no spoon. There there is an Agora. But, when this proposal goes >> into effect, there becomes a spoon, but there ceases to be an Agora. > > INEFFECTIVE. This will fail for a number of reasons. Name one.
4 Mar 2011 17:30
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: End of game
Sean Hunt <scshunt <at> csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
2011-03-04 16:30:27 GMT
2011-03-04 16:30:27 GMT
On 11-03-04 11:29 AM, omd wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Sean Hunt<scshunt <at> csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: >> On 11-03-04 01:28 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> Proposal: End the Game (AI = 3): >>> >>> There is no spoon. There there is an Agora. But, when this proposal goes >>> into effect, there becomes a spoon, but there ceases to be an Agora. >> >> INEFFECTIVE. This will fail for a number of reasons. > > Name one. AIAN -scshunt
RSS Feed