headers
Alexander Smith | 1 Sep 2008 18:48
Picon
Picon

DIS: RE: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report

It doesn't matter, really; if I get a Mill of any sort I won't get a Digit Ranch but I will get a WRV, so I'll have
enough WRV to cover all my Digit Ranches.
-- 
ais523

________________________________

From: agora-business-admin <at> agoranomic.org on behalf of Benjamin Schultz
Sent: Fri 29/08/2008 00:54
To: Agora Business
Subject: Re: BUS: AAA - Secretary of Agriculture Report

On Aug 28, 2008, at 4:49 PM, ais523 wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:35 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Federal Subsidy: 10
> I request subsidization. (Hopefully it'll happen before the end of the
> month and I'll get a Mill out of this; then I'll have enough WRV to
> cover my Digit Ranches.)

I request subsidization.

ais523, which mill do you need?
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
Attachment (winmail.dat): application/ms-tnef, 3887 bytes
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
comex | 1 Sep 2008 22:23
Picon

DIS: Re: BUS: RE: Full Logical Ruleset

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Alexander Smith <AIS523 <at> bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> Rule 2193/12 (Power=1)
>> The Monster
> CoE: You accidentally duplicated part of this rule.

Fixed, along with a bunch of other errors.  *crosses fingers*

http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.txt
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Taral | 2 Sep 2008 19:26
Picon

DIS: Re: BUS: Subsidizations

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> I create a Mill (land #134) with an Operator of - (Subtraction) and a
> WRV in Taral's possession.

Yay!

--

-- 
Taral <taralx <at> gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
 -- Unknown
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Taral | 3 Sep 2008 01:15
Picon

DIS: Re: BUS: About Pikhq

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods <at> googlemail.com> wrote:
> I pledge that the above quote was really said to me by pikhq (I can
> terminate this
> pledge at any time).

We really should define contracts to require that they at least
potentially place obligations on people. In RL contract law, this
thing wouldn't be a contract.

--

-- 
Taral <taralx <at> gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
 -- Unknown
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Elliott Hird | 3 Sep 2008 01:22
Gravatar

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About Pikhq

2008/9/3 Taral <taralx <at> gmail.com>:
> We really should define contracts to require that they at least
> potentially place obligations on people. In RL contract law, this
> thing wouldn't be a contract.

Well, I think it's a useful "I assert that this is true".
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
ihope | 3 Sep 2008 03:04
Picon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: About Pikhq

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods <at> googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2008/9/3 Taral <taralx <at> gmail.com>:
>> We really should define contracts to require that they at least
>> potentially place obligations on people. In RL contract law, this
>> thing wouldn't be a contract.
>
> Well, I think it's a useful "I assert that this is true".

I pledge that the Earth is square.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Benjamin Schultz | 3 Sep 2008 04:07
Picon

DIS: DRAFT Grand Poobah report

This is a DRAFT report of the Caste status as of right now.  Please  
correct errors now, before the September caste cycling happens.

Grand Poobah Report -- DRAFT

Time of Last Report: 18 Aug 2008 21:09
Time of This Report: 03 Sep 2008

CASTE
-----
ALPHA (Voting Limit: 8)
  Murphy

BETA (Voting Limit: 5)
  Taral
  root

GAMMA (Voting Limit: 3)
  BobTHJ
  pikhq
  Wooble
  AFO
  Zefram
  OscarMeyr

DELTA (Voting Limit: 2)
  ais523
  comex
  Quazie
  woggle
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
Taral | 3 Sep 2008 04:13
Picon

Re: DIS: DRAFT Grand Poobah report

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Benjamin Schultz <ke3om <at> verizon.net> wrote:
> This is a DRAFT report of the Caste status as of right now.  Please correct
> errors now, before the September caste cycling happens.

I was pretty sure that the promotions worked. It was the next step that didn't.

--

-- 
Taral <taralx <at> gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
 -- Unknown
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ed Murphy | 3 Sep 2008 05:02
Picon

Re: DIS: DRAFT Grand Poobah report

OscarMeyr wrote:

> ALPHA (Voting Limit: 8)
>   Murphy

Alphas platonically reset to default at the start of the month.  (I
meant to demote myself first, but real life interrupted.)

> BETA (Voting Limit: 5)
>   Taral
>   root

Tue 12 Aug 19:12:08  Wooble     C D E F G   self      Gamma   -> Beta
Wed 27 Aug 04:33:10  Murphy     D F# A      OscarMeyr Gamma   -> Beta

> GAMMA (Voting Limit: 3)
>   BobTHJ
>   pikhq
>   Wooble
>   AFO
>   Zefram
>   OscarMeyr

Tue 12 Aug 22:25:56  OscarMeyr  D F# A      Goethe    Delta   -> Gamma
Wed 27 Aug 04:33:10  Murphy     B D# F#     woggle    Delta   -> Gamma

Otherwise, this matches my records.

The promotions/demotions all failed because the rule didn't empower
the Grand Poobah to do them (precedent is that "SHALL by announcement"
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Benjamin Schultz | 3 Sep 2008 05:16
Picon

Re: DIS: DRAFT Grand Poobah report


>
> The promotions/demotions all failed because the rule didn't empower
> the Grand Poobah to do them (precedent is that "SHALL by announcement"
> implies "CAN by announcement", but merely "SHALL" does not).  This may
> have been fixed by now, but definitely hadn't been at the time.

R2211/1 still says SHALL, not SHALL by announcement.  Props. 5682-87  
don't look like they're going to address this.
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane