headers
Josiah Worcester | 1 Feb 2008 01:05
Picon

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1888 assigned to OscarMeyr

On 21:28 Wed 30 Jan     , Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> Gratuitous evidence:  I often don't have ag-dis delivery turned on, so such 
> messages are frequently not "sent" to me (I do, obviously, read them from
> the archives).  -Goethe

Do you understand and have you carefully weighed the full implications of
failing to do so, as rule 478 would have you do?
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Ian Kelly | 1 Feb 2008 01:23
Picon

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1888 assigned to OscarMeyr

On Jan 31, 2008 5:05 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21:28 Wed 30 Jan     , Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Gratuitous evidence:  I often don't have ag-dis delivery turned on, so such
> > messages are frequently not "sent" to me (I do, obviously, read them from
> > the archives).  -Goethe
>
> Do you understand and have you carefully weighed the full implications of
> failing to do so, as rule 478 would have you do?

R478 only requires subscription to the public fora, which is the whole
point of distinguishing the two types of fora in the first place.

-root
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Benjamin Schultz | 1 Feb 2008 03:42
Picon

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:16 PM, ihope wrote:

> I register.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII

<Synthesized voice>Another visitor!  Stay a while....
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Ed Murphy | 1 Feb 2008 04:13
Picon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

OscarMeyr wrote:

> On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:16 PM, ihope wrote:
> 
>> I register.
>>
>> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
> 
> 
> <Synthesized voice>Another visitor!  Stay a while....

This is just begging to be added to the Mad Scientist role, somehow.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kerim Aydin | 1 Feb 2008 05:14

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1888 assigned to OscarMeyr


On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Benjamin Schultz wrote: 
> (with a notice similar to mine) to all registered players; relying on players 
> subscribing to or reading the archives of a public forum is not sufficient. 

I think you mean "non-public forum" here; relying on players subscribing to a 
public forum is part of R478.  -Goethe
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Zefram | 1 Feb 2008 10:59

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1882 assigned to woggle

Ed Murphy wrote:
>Denied.  This is true in the passive sense.

The case history is a listing of events, not samplings of states.

-zefram
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Zefram | 1 Feb 2008 11:33

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1879: assign Goddess Eris

comex wrote:
>... therefore the outcome is APPROVED, and I hereby appeal the
>judgement of CFJ 1879.

What's the status of this appeal?

-zefram
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Zefram | 1 Feb 2008 15:17

DIS: Re: BUS: deputy

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I initiate a criminal CFJ with Zefram as the defendant, alleging e
>violated Rule 2149 in the above message by making the statement "I
>intend to deputise for BobTHJ to deregister em." while not reasonably
>believing it to be true.

On what grounds do you think I didn't intend it?

-zefram
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Geoffrey Spear | 1 Feb 2008 15:27
Picon
Gravatar

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: deputy

On Feb 1, 2008 9:17 AM, Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org> wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >I initiate a criminal CFJ with Zefram as the defendant, alleging e
> >violated Rule 2149 in the above message by making the statement "I
> >intend to deputise for BobTHJ to deregister em." while not reasonably
> >believing it to be true.
>
> On what grounds do you think I didn't intend it?

On the grounds that BobTHJ isn't a position and there's no reason to
believe you can deputize for an individual player whose obligations
aren't a result of holding a position.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Zefram | 1 Feb 2008 15:32

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: deputy

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>On the grounds that BobTHJ isn't a position

I think e is, and so is eir membership in the Vote Market.  "Position"
is a very broad term, which is why I voted against proposal 5414.

-zefram
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane