DIS: Missing proposal in the Rulesets?

DIS: Missing proposal in the Rulesets?

Benjamin Schultz writes:

> I can't find the rule "Voting Credits" from Prop. 4872 in the SLR or
> FLR.  I'd submit a COE, but that got repealed.

You're right; it's missing.  Sorry about that, I'll put out corrected
versions of both rulesets shortly. 

Michael.

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1591 assigned to Maud

On 12/10/06, Ed Murphy <emurphy42 <at> socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1591
>
> ==============================  CFJ 1591  ==============================
>
>      Evantine is a Fugitive.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller:                                 Goethe
>
> Judge:                                  Maud

I remind H. CotC Murphy that I requested on 20 November to be made
ineligible to judge CFJs.  See

http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2006-November/005943.html

for the message.

I therefore request that this assignment be reconsidered.

--

-- 
Michael Slone

DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

On 12/12/06, Taral <taralx <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, with the holidays coming up, I go On Hold.

Unfortunately, going on hold is no longer defined.

--

-- 
Michael Slone

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

On 12/12/06, Michael Slone wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, going on hold is no longer defined.

Which means that I am now a fully registered player again without
having to say anything. How convenient, I was thinking of going off
hold soon.

--
Manu

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

On 12/13/06, Manuel Lanctot <sensoz <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Which means that I am now a fully registered player again without
> having to say anything. How convenient, I was thinking of going off
> hold soon.

Welcome back, then!

--

-- 
Michael Slone

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

--- Ed Murphy <emurphy42 <at> socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Manu wrote:
> 
> > On 12/12/06, Michael Slone wrote:
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, going on hold is no longer defined.
> > 
> > Which means that I am now a fully registered player again without
> > having to say anything. How convenient, I was thinking of going off
> > hold soon.
> 
> Not necessarily.  From Judge GreyKnight's arguments on CFJ 1589:
> 
> "All players that were inactive when 4866 was adopted are
>   considered inactive for any such rule until they next participate
> in
>   Agora, from which point they should be considered active."
> 
> Wait a minute, I think GreyKnight mistakenly wrote FALSE instead of
> TRUE.  (I did pretty much the same thing myself, once.)  As such, I
> appeal the judgement of CFJ 1589.
> 

Hmm, that IS the wrong way around. Consider:

> CFJ 1589: Quazie is inactive.
> Arguments: [...] Then, by this ruling, Quazie will be inactive (so
CFJ 1589 is FALSE).

I must've gotten the statement inverted in my head by the time I got to
the bottom of writing the arguments.

God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.greyfire.org

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hold

root wrote:

> On 12/14/06, *Grey Knight* <greyknight3 <at> yahoo.com 
> <mailto:greyknight3 <at> yahoo.com>> wrote:

>      > Wait a minute, I think GreyKnight mistakenly wrote FALSE instead of
>      > TRUE.  (I did pretty much the same thing myself, once.)  As such, I
>      > appeal the judgement of CFJ 1589.

>     I must've gotten the statement inverted in my head by the time I got to
>     the bottom of writing the arguments.

> Happens all the time.

So are y'all gonna join me in appealing the judgement?  :)

DIS: Re: BUS: Submission to the Clerk of the Courts

On 12/15/06, Kerim Aydin <kerim <at> u.washington.edu> wrote:
> Agora is dead.  Goodbye.

Although ordinarily I would be sorry to see you go, your
assessment is clearly correct.  Agora has been dead for years,
but because it was the "oldest, wisest Nomic", we refused to
admit it.

I hope to see you around *somewhere* soon.

--

-- 
Michael Slone