1 Apr 2011 01:06
Re: Adding strings to .pot file
Following up another of these points:
Sini Ruohomaa writes:
> On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 17:36 +0100, Klemen Košir wrote:
> > 3. "%s has finished building %s" - There should be multiple instanced of
> > this string for every thing that has been build, e.g.: "%s has finished
> > building unit %s", "%s has finished building building %s", "%s has
> > finished building wonder %s", ... There may be more, I don't know what
> > else can be built. Same problem is with other string "%s has started
> > building", ...
>
> I have the same problem, would the same workaround work - translating it
> with a generic word, "%s has finished its job-task-project %s"? (I'm not
> sure what "hanke" would translate as exactly, but its basic meaning is
> "project".)
It would be a simple matter to distinguish units from buildings/wonders
with qualified strings ("?unit:%s is finished building %s.")[*]. With
just a little more coding, it would also be possible to distinguish
wonders from non-wonder buildings (and even great wonders from small
wonders, if that were useful).
However, beyond that there isn't a solution, and I'm wondering what
level of distinction is useful when balanced against the proliferation
of strings. What is the nature of the problem to be solved here, and do
the differences between these nouns in your languages correlate with the
classes that it's easy to distinguish in the code? For instance, these
classes don't correlate well with plurality ("Caravan"/"Oracle" vs
"Riflemen"/"Hanging Gardens").
(Continue reading)
- ML
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-i18n mailing list
RSS Feed