Re: Playouts vs playingstrength
Rémi Coulom <Remi.Coulom <at> free.fr>
2013-11-20 11:57:02 GMT
100 pts/rank is really very wrong. I don’t have data here, but I remember when I ran WHR experiments on KGS
data, it was very clear that Elo points / rank increases a lot with rank. At the strength of Crazy Stone (KGS
5d), a rank is worth much more than 200 Elo points. For beginners, it may be somewhere around 50 Elo points.
Elo points/handicap stone probably approaches infinity when getting close to optimal play.
On 20 nov. 2013, at 12:17, Petri Pitkanen <petri.t.pitkanen <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> EGF uses GOR which to my understanding is based on Elo model. With arbitrary equality to old systems 2100
GOR = 1 dan and 100 pts/rank
> 2013/11/20 Nick Wedd <nick <at> maproom.co.uk>
> On 20/11/2013 06:45, Detlef Schmicker wrote:
> After turning off pondering in pachi the plot looks much more sensible:
> What is the relationship between "ELO" as shown on the graph, and Go
> rating, in AGA or EGF terms?
> I will now do some comparison with proportional increasing playouts in
> pachi and oakfoam.