headers
Steve Youngs | 1 Dec 2008 04:12
X-Face
Face
Gravatar

Nelson's recent build failures

Sebastian!

This is directed mainly at you, but anyone else can feel free to help
too.  Could you please take a look at Nelson's recent build failures
that have been reported to sxemacs-builds list and give him a hand to
sort them out.

Thanks mate!

--

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|       SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need.       |
|         Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good!          |
|------------------------------------<steve <at> sxemacs.org>---|
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Nelson Ferreira | 1 Dec 2008 07:51
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Nelson's recent build failures


On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Steve Youngs wrote:

> Sebastian!
>
> This is directed mainly at you, but anyone else can feel free to help
> too.  Could you please take a look at Nelson's recent build failures
> that have been reported to sxemacs-builds list and give him a hand to
> sort them out.
>

Hmmm I have some weird update on the failure with the billion  
error_check.* link errors
This _seems_ to be related to the PATH when configure was done.
I did _on the command line_ (as opposed to inside a cron job...) and  
the _exact_ same configure line compiled just fine...
So now I just have to digg what exactly makes the cron version fail  
so badly with it.

More news tomorrow.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SXEmacs Issue Tracking | 1 Dec 2008 15:09

[Bug 102] New: asyneq race condition

http://issues.sxemacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102

           Summary: asyneq race condition
           Product: SXEmacs
           Version: 22.1.10
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: General
        AssignedTo: steve <at> sxemacs.org
        ReportedBy: zevlg <at> yandex.ru
         QAContact: sxemacs-devel <at> sxemacs.org

Asyncuronous command events MUST not be executed during `accept-process-output'
and like otherwise it leads to race condition.  Assume scenario:

   1) Some mode sets `post-command-hook'

   2) During `post-command-hook' it moves point under `save-excursion'

   3) Waits output from some external command to make a decision about
      change at point

   4) Command event(you press a key, f.e. self-insert-command "t")
      occurs during `accept-process-output' of (3) stage

   5) Here is the race: if `save-excursion' sets point back to original
      before async execution of `self-insert-command' then everything is
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Andreas Roehler | 1 Dec 2008 16:04
Picon

Re: New snapshot tarballs available

Sebastian Freundt wrote:
> Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler <at> online.de> writes:
> 
>> Steve Youngs wrote:
>>> * Steve Youngs <steve <at> sxemacs.org> writes:
>>>
>>>   > Hey Folks!
>>>   > I've just uploaded new snapshot tarballs...
>>>
>>>   >   http://downloads.sxemacs.org/snapshots/sxemacs-22.1.10.tar.gz
>>>   >   http://downloads.sxemacs.org/snapshots/sxemacs-22.1.10.tar.bz2
>>>   >   http://downloads.sxemacs.org/snapshots/sxemacs-22.1.10.tar.lzma
>>>
>>> My god, I'm such a moron!  Try these instead...
>>>
>>>   http://downloads.sxemacs.org/snapshots/sxemacs-22.1.10p67.tar.gz
>>>   http://downloads.sxemacs.org/snapshots/sxemacs-22.1.10p67.tar.bz2
>>>   http://downloads.sxemacs.org/snapshots/sxemacs-22.1.10p67.tar.lzma
>>>
>>> sorry 'bout that.
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>> Here my report:
>>
>> After ./configure and `make' I see an excutable
>> `sxemacs' in directory src.
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
SXEmacs Issue Tracking | 1 Dec 2008 16:43

[Bug 102] asyneq race condition

http://issues.sxemacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102

Steve Youngs <steve <at> sxemacs.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Steve Youngs <steve <at> sxemacs.org>  2008-12-02 01:42:36 EST ---
Fixed in...

  steve <at> sxemacs.org--2008/sxemacs--main--22.1.10--patch-76

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.sxemacs.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Zajcev Evgeny | 5 Dec 2008 11:55
X-Face
Picon
Favicon

video glyphs


Hey! I just discovered interesting opportunity in (S)XEmacs.  That is
video glyphs, i.e. glyphs running video inside.  Just try out this
code:

    (defun lg-video-glyph (file &optional w h)
      "Create video glyph to play FILE.
    Optionally you can specify width and height by passing W and H args."
      (let* ((gg (make-glyph [subwindow]))
             (prc (start-process "mplayer" nil "mplayer"
                                 "-wid" (int-to-string
                                         (subwindow-xid
                                          (glyph-image-instance gg)))
                                 (expand-file-name file))))
        (resize-subwindow
         (glyph-image-instance gg) (or w 200) (or h 140))
        (put gg 'mplayer-proc prc)
        gg))

    (setq gg (lg-video-glyph "~/crypt/video/kunfu-panda.mp4"))
    (set-extent-end-glyph
     (make-extent (point) (point))
     gg)

than you are able to resize video glyph with sexp like this:

    (resize-subwindow (glyph-image-instance gg) WIDTH HEIGHT)

Most interesting is that if you point the cursor inside that glyph you
can control mplayer as normal, i mean you can rewind, pause, change
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Zajcev Evgeny | 5 Dec 2008 18:20
X-Face
Picon
Favicon

HAVE_X_WINDOWS


Maybe rename HAVE_X_WINDOWS to HAVE_X_WINDOW or HAVE_X_WINDOW_SYSTEM ? 

There is no such thing as X Windows

or it does not worth the trouble?

--

-- 
lg
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
njsf | 6 Dec 2008 03:06
Favicon

Re: video glyphs

I need to setup my gnus again and allow it to play it like that

-----Original Message-----

From:  Zajcev Evgeny <zevlg <at> yandex.ru>
Subj:  video glyphs
Date:  Fri 5 Dec 2008 5:59
Size:  1K
To:  XEmacs Beta <xemacs-beta <at> xemacs.org>; SXEmacs devel <sxemacs-devel <at> sxemacs.org>

Hey! I just discovered interesting opportunity in (S)XEmacs.  That is
video glyphs, i.e. glyphs running video inside.  Just try out this
code:

    (defun lg-video-glyph (file &optional w h)
      "Create video glyph to play FILE.
    Optionally you can specify width and height by passing W and H args."
      (let* ((gg (make-glyph [subwindow]))
             (prc (start-process "mplayer" nil "mplayer"
                                 "-wid" (int-to-string
                                         (subwindow-xid
                                          (glyph-image-instance gg)))
                                 (expand-file-name file))))
        (resize-subwindow
         (glyph-image-instance gg) (or w 200) (or h 140))
        (put gg 'mplayer-proc prc)
        gg))

    (setq gg (lg-video-glyph "~/crypt/video/kunfu-panda.mp4"))
    (set-extent-end-glyph
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Steve Youngs | 6 Dec 2008 06:50
X-Face
Face
Gravatar

Re: HAVE_X_WINDOWS

* Zajcev Evgeny <zevlg <at> yandex.ru> writes:

  > Maybe rename HAVE_X_WINDOWS to HAVE_X_WINDOW or HAVE_X_WINDOW_SYSTEM ? 
  > There is no such thing as X Windows

I'm in total agreement.

  > or it does not worth the trouble?

Probably not, but I won't reject the MR if you decide to do it. :-)

--

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|       SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need.       |
|         Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good!          |
|------------------------------------<steve <at> sxemacs.org>---|
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Steve Youngs | 6 Dec 2008 06:52
X-Face
Face
Gravatar

Re: HAVE_X_WINDOWS

* Zajcev Evgeny <zevlg <at> yandex.ru> writes:

  > Maybe rename HAVE_X_WINDOWS to HAVE_X_WINDOW or HAVE_X_WINDOW_SYSTEM ? 

Oh, just thought of something.  XEmacs defines that too, don't they?
The HAVE_X_WINDOWS.  If we change ours, it could cause synching problems
later.

I still wouldn't reject an MR though. :-)

--

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|       SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need.       |
|         Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good!          |
|------------------------------------<steve <at> sxemacs.org>---|
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane