1 Dec 2004 01:45
Re: lispref gmake info build Error 2 on 11/29/2004 CVS pull
Luc Teirlinck <teirllm <at> dms.auburn.edu>
2004-12-01 00:45:38 GMT
2004-12-01 00:45:38 GMT
Richard Stallman wrote: The bootstrap mechanism should be fixed so that errors in generating an Info file don't prevent bootstrapping from finishing. I am not sure about that. It would mean that the user might wind up without some important manuals. Also, right now, errors in bootstrapping (with the exception of the one we are talking about) are usually fixed in a matter of hours, because a maintainer notices or a user files a bug report. If an error in the manual only causes some error messages to be printed, that flash unread across the screen, like all those tons of other error messages, serious non-deliberate errors in the manual may remain unnoticed. There are plenty of known problems with the Elisp and Emacs manuals that still need to be fixed and that are more serious than the fact that those two variables are not yet documented. Why is remembering those two problems both so unusually difficult and so unusually important that it is worth disabling building the Elisp manual until they are fixed? There are other ways to catalogue and remember what one still has to do than to cause errors. If they are so important, why do we not fix them right now? What about the following three patches? It would be good if somebody really familiar with the frame parameter and variable `line-spacing' could double check whether the description is 100 percent accurate. (If not, then the docstring is unclear.) Even if there would still be some problems with the patches why do we not comment out these error producing xrefs, so that people can bootstrap without problems again. It should not take all eternity to get those two variables documented(Continue reading)

RSS Feed