headers
Henrik Grotjahn | 2 Sep 2006 19:01
Picon

11.82; Falsches Highliting bei Verwendung von » «


Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen.

Be sure to consult the FAQ section in the manual before submitting
a bug report.  If the bug (or problem) is triggered by a specific
(La)TeX file, you should try to produce a minimal sample file
showing the problem and include it in your report.

Your bug report will be posted to the AUCTeX bug reporting list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wie eben in dce gewünscht, hier der Fehlerbericht zum falschen
Highliting. Bei »deutscher« Verwendung, wäre jetzt alles hervorgehoben
von Verwendung, bis »hier«.

Emacs  : GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0)
  of 2006-06-27 on rodrigues.inf.ed.ac.uk - Aquamacs Distribution 0.9.9d
Package: 11.82

current state:
==============
(setq
  AUCTeX-date "2005-12-17"
  window-system 'mac
  LaTeX-version "2e"
  TeX-style-path '("style" "auto"
		  "/Applications/Aquamacs 
Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/site-lisp/edit-modes/auctex/style" 
"/Applications/Aquamacs
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ralf Angeli | 2 Sep 2006 19:22

Re: 11.82; Falsches Highliting bei Verwendung von » «

* Henrik Grotjahn (2006-09-02) writes:

> Wie eben in dce gewünscht, hier der Fehlerbericht zum falschen
> Highliting. Bei »deutscher« Verwendung, wäre jetzt alles hervorgehoben
> von Verwendung, bis »hier«.
>
> Emacs  : GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0)
>   of 2006-06-27 on rodrigues.inf.ed.ac.uk - Aquamacs Distribution 0.9.9d
> Package: 11.82

As I suspected you are using an older version of AUCTeX.  Upgrade and
the problems should vanish (without having to fiddle with
`font-latex-quotes').

--

-- 
Ralf
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
David Kastrup | 5 Sep 2006 10:59
Picon
Picon

Re: concerns in the documentation


Didier Verna <didier <at> xemacs.org> writes:

>         Hi !
>
> Here are two problems in the doc:
>
>
> 1/ The node "Loading the package" in the AUC-TeX info documentation suggests
> that it is not even needed in XEmacs to (require 'tex-site) to activate it. 
> This is not quite true however. For instance, I have a full packages
> installation, including the texinfo package which also contains a tex-mode and
> a latex-mode. Without this stanza in my init.el, the texinfo modes are used. 
> So I suggest that (require 'tex-site) should be used in all situations.
>
> 2/ I originally posted this information on auc-tex_mgr <at> sunsite.dk, as
> adviertised on the first page of the info manual, but this got rejected (the
> adress is said to be dead).

And I _did_ tell you to use bug-auctex <at> gnu.org instead and explained
why.  So I am manually diverting this from the auc-tex list at
Sunsite, and apologize that people will not see the original posting
(if I moderated it through, it would appear on auctex instead of
bug-auctex, and replies would again go to Sunsite).

> Emacs  : XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" [Lucid] (i686-pc-linux, Mule) of Wed May 25 2005 on uzeb
> Package: AUCTeX 11.55

Your version of AUCTeX is completely outdated: 11.55 was released on
2005-02-04, 11.81 was released on 2005-09-25, about a year ago.  By
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Didier Verna | 5 Sep 2006 16:33
X-Face
Face
Picon
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: concerns in the documentation

David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> wrote:

>> 2/ I originally posted this information on auc-tex_mgr <at> sunsite.dk, as
>> adviertised on the first page of the info manual, but this got rejected (the
>> adress is said to be dead).
>
> And I _did_ tell you to use bug-auctex <at> gnu.org instead and explained why.

        Sorry, I used the bug reporting function. Since the package was
outdated, the wrong address was used.

> Your version of AUCTeX is completely outdated

> You are likely using the Sumo tarball from XEmacs.

        I use CVS packages; that's why I thought it was up to date.

> This contains an outdated and partly broken version of AUCTeX. There is no
> active AUCTeX maintainer among XEmacs developers at the moment, so it is not
> likely that they'll even fix the wrong mailing list addresses.
>
> Please uninstall AUCTeX via the package manager, then install a new
> version from
> <URL:ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/auctex/auctex-11.83-pkg.tar.gz>.  This
> is a perfectly viable and working XEmacs package, but since it was not
> created using XEmacs' development tools, it will not get accepted into
> XEmacs by the XEmacs development team.  Which is actually a pity,
> since AUCTeX-11.83 also comes with preview-latex integrated.

        I remember threads about this on xemacs-beta (in Cc:), but did not
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
David Kastrup | 5 Sep 2006 17:26
X-Face
Picon
Picon

Re: concerns in the documentation

Didier Verna <didier <at> xemacs.org> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Your version of AUCTeX is completely outdated
>
>> You are likely using the Sumo tarball from XEmacs.
>
>         I use CVS packages; that's why I thought it was up to date.
>
>> This contains an outdated and partly broken version of
>> AUCTeX. There is no active AUCTeX maintainer among XEmacs
>> developers at the moment, so it is not likely that they'll even fix
>> the wrong mailing list addresses.

For the record: the mailing lists are mentioned in a number of
locations, partly with  <at>  <at>  instead of the normal at sign (required in
TeXinfo).  The current bug reporting list would be bug-auctex <at> gnu.org,
the general discussion list auctex <at> gnu.org, the developer's list
auctex-devel <at> gnu.org.  Any mailing addresses of the form
auc-tex.* <at>  <at> ?sunsite.dk
are outdated.  They are partly dead, partly require a lot of operator
intervention to get the postings to the right addresses with the right
header.

It would be a sign of courtesy to at least correct those if nothing
else.  In particular the bug reporting address in
TeX-submit-bug-report in tex.el.

>> Please uninstall AUCTeX via the package manager, then install a new
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Sigve Berge Hofland | 5 Sep 2006 21:30
Picon

make not found

Hi

I am trying to configure auctex-11.83 but I get this error message:

checking for make... no
configure: error: make not found, aborting!

I am terribly sorry if this is a simple problem caused by my technical incompetance and not really a bug
report, but I have follwed the installation instructions very carefully, and I have searched the web
thoroughly for descriptions of my problem for several days now, without any luck. I must have read
hundreds of installation guides, problem descriptions, FAQs, etc. and I have no clue about what I am doing
wrong, so I would be extremely grateful for any assistance.

Thank you in advance
Kind regards
Sigve Berge Hofland
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
David Kastrup | 6 Sep 2006 01:11
Picon
Picon

Re: make not found

"Sigve Berge Hofland" <sigve <at> hofland.no> writes:

> Hi
>
> I am trying to configure auctex-11.83 but I get this error message:
>
> checking for make... no
> configure: error: make not found, aborting!
>
> I am terribly sorry if this is a simple problem caused by my
> technical incompetance and not really a bug report, but I have
> follwed the installation instructions very carefully, and I have
> searched the web thoroughly for descriptions of my problem for
> several days now, without any luck. I must have read hundreds of
> installation guides, problem descriptions, FAQs, etc. and I have no
> clue about what I am doing wrong, so I would be extremely grateful
> for any assistance.

What operating system are you using?  You need to have a make utility
installed and in your PATH: how this is done very much depends on the
system in question.

--

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ralf Angeli | 6 Sep 2006 07:14

Re: make not found

* Sigve Berge Hofland (2006-09-05) writes:

> I am trying to configure auctex-11.83 but I get this error message:
>
> checking for make... no configure: error: make not found, aborting!

Which platform are you on?  Is make installed?  Is make in PATH?

--

-- 
Ralf
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane