6 Apr 2003 17:37
Re: [preview-latex-devel] [windows 2000, AFPL Ghost Script] preview-latex installation problems
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
2003-04-06 15:37:57 GMT
2003-04-06 15:37:57 GMT
Harald Muehlboeck <harald <at> clef.at> writes: > On 30 Mar 2003, David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> wrote: > > > What made you think that --with-xemacs takes a directory as its argument? > > Well most likely I thought so, because all other --with arguments > were directories. At least defining paths in the course of an > installation process was always associated by defining directories. > > Reading the installation insurrection I must have left the point with- > emacs, because I did not use emacs but xemacs. Probably the --(Continue reading)with- > emacs=path-to-emacs.exe could be mentioned again in the Xemacs point. > > I have to admit, that I tried ./configure without these options for > the first time. There the process terminated saying that it could not > find an emacs or xemacs installation. So I specified the Path to the > Emacs directory. As configure now found an Xemacs and conformed that > Xemacs ist really Xemacs, I thougt this option to be set correctly. I think `configure' just acknowledged that instead of looking itself it would take what you have specifically requested. There are some cases with installation into separate trees where the user's explicit choice actually should be used even in case where it would appear "wrong". > > > 2.) The variable "preview-gs-command" seems to be set wrong after > > > installation. > > > > How did you "start preview-latex" for the first time? The

RSS Feed