1 Aug 2002 03:28
Re: Broken threading [was: Unbelievable.]
Tom Hardy <rhardy <at> mailandnews.com>
2002-08-01 01:28:17 GMT
2002-08-01 01:28:17 GMT
In article <240720022348365027%planb <at> newsreaders.com>, "J.B. Moreno" <planb <at> newsreaders.com> writes: > In article <m3fzy99j2f.fsf <at> defun.localdomain>, > Jesper Harder <harder <at> myrealbox.com> wrote: >> Thomas Yan <tyan <at> twcny.rr.com> writes: >> > -(Continue reading)snip- >> > You don't have a problem with some mail programs that see a >> References > header, but don't know what it is and therefore stick >> it in the reply? >> >> Ah, I see. I haven't encountered that problem. >> >> So what you probably want is to check if the message-id in >> In-Reply-To is equal to the last message-id in References -- and if >> it isn't then use the one from In-Reply-To instead. > That might work -- then again it might not. I once did some local > gatewaying in order to read a mailing list with a threaded view, and > the only thing that was reliable was that programs repeated their > mistakes. You are describing a "generic" method, which did indeed > work most of the time, but I had to have a whole bunch of special > cases (it wouldn't surprise me to learn that some of them were > developed by throwing darts to see what they should do), I thought I would look at cases just for fun. Tell me if I am all wet or otherwise wasting my time.



RSS Feed