1 Nov 2008 03:17
Re: gnus should accept UTF8 even if UTF-8 is standard
Kenichi Handa <handa <at> m17n.org>
2008-11-01 02:17:14 GMT
2008-11-01 02:17:14 GMT
In article <E1KvziI-0005Qf-30 <at> fencepost.gnu.org>, "Richard M. Stallman" <rms <at> gnu.org> writes: > In the case of filenames, there surely exist the actual file > with those ignored extensions. But, in the case of coding > systems, such an alias as "utf8" doesn't exist. Or do you > still propose to make such an alias as a sencond-class name > in advance? > To define them as second-class extensions would be one method. > Another is this: `read-coding-system' could create the completion > alist, then add to it modified entries made by replacing "utf-8" with > "utf8". Then it could read the name, using the appropriate kind of > completion. When it gets back the value from `completing-read', it > could replace "utf8" with "utf-8". > This avoids having a list of second-class "utf8" aliases. Those > aliases would be constructed automatically from the valid names > that start with "utf-8". > If so, I strongly oppose to it. > Why, what harm would it do? With that, people think that "utf8" is a valid coding system name, and will write a code something like this: (decode-coding-string STR 'utf8) and found that it signals an error because utf8 is not statically declared as an alias. > If we are(Continue reading)





RSS Feed