Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Hi Robert.

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:18:06 +0200, Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> So here is a bundle including both other, i.e. the output of
> "bzr bundle-revisions".

I'm also using XEmacs (21.4.18) and found I could not compile DVC. So I
saw your bundle and tried to apply it, but I'm not sure I'm doing it
right. I'm quite new to bzr (stuck with baz/tla until DVC seemed like it
could me as-good an experience with bzr as xtla with baz :), so I might be
doing something wrong.

I saved your attachment in the file called xemacs-compilation-fixes.bundle
As far as I can tell the file is uncorrupted. The first line is:

# Bazaar revision bundle v0.8

and the last line:

#   branch-nick: dvc

but when I try to merge from it I get:

brick <at> genugtig:/usr/local/src/dvc
$ bzr merge  ../xemacs-compilation-fixes.bundle
bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: /usr/local/src/xemacs-compilation-fixes.bundle/

I'm using bzr 0.8.2 as shipped with Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper). Do you have any
idea what's wrong?

Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Neilen Marais <nmarais <at> sun.ac.za> writes:

> I'm using bzr 0.8.2 as shipped with Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper). Do you have any
> idea what's wrong?

Bupdles appeared in bzr 0.9, so no surprise ...

Either upgrade bzr (recommanded, right now, we're following the
evolution of bzr, and not making efforts to support old versions), or
apply the bundle with "patch".

--

-- 
Matthieu

Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy <at> imag.fr> writes:

> Neilen Marais <nmarais <at> sun.ac.za> writes:
>
>> I'm using bzr 0.8.2 as shipped with Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper). Do you
>> have any idea what's wrong?
>
> Bupdles appeared in bzr 0.9, so no surprise ...
>
> Either upgrade bzr (recommanded, right now, we're following the
> evolution of bzr, and not making efforts to support old versions),
> or apply the bundle with "patch".

On a related note, do you know of a repository that has a Dapper
backport for bzr 0.9?  I'd prefer not to switch to edgy quite yet.

--

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG
 |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC

_______________________________________________
Dvc-dev mailing list
Dvc-dev <at> gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev

Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Michael Olson <mwolson <at> gnu.org> writes:

> On a related note, do you know of a repository that has a Dapper
> backport for bzr 0.9?  I'd prefer not to switch to edgy quite yet.

My solution is simply to have a local branch of bzr.dev on my user
account, and "bzr pull" regularly. I'm running bzr from the source
tree without installing it, since bzr is pure python, it works well,
python regenerates the .pyc on-demand.

Otherwise,

http://bazaar-vcs.org/DistroDownloads

indicates

deb http://bazaar-vcs.org/releases/debs/ ./

--

-- 
Matthieu

Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy <at> imag.fr> writes:

> Michael Olson <mwolson <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> On a related note, do you know of a repository that has a Dapper
>> backport for bzr 0.9?  I'd prefer not to switch to edgy quite yet.
>
> [snip]
>
> deb http://bazaar-vcs.org/releases/debs/ ./

Thanks, that's what I was looking for.

--

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG
 |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC

_______________________________________________
Dvc-dev mailing list
Dvc-dev <at> gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev

Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Robert Widhopf-Fenk <hack <at> robf.de> writes:

> On Tuesday, August 29, 2006 at 22:54:17, Stefan Reichör wrote:
>> Stefan Reichör <stefan <at> xsteve.at> writes:
>> 
>> > Hm. I have the same problem with my Gnus.
>> > I had very often problems with inline patches.
>> > For example a double \ is shown as a single \
>> >
>> > So let's try if I can reproduce this problem in this mail.
>> > The lines below contain 1,2,3,4 backslashes.
>> >
>> > 1*\: \
>> > 2*\: \
>> > 3*\: \
>> > 4*\: \
>> 
>> Just for the record:
>> I received the following number of backslashes
>> 1*:  1
>> 2*:  1
>> 3*:  2
>> 4*:  2
>> 
>> So there is a bug somewhere in Gnus 
>
> Sad, I cannot belive this.  Do you have some xmas, folding
> or other text transformations activated?
>
> I see them correctly in VM.

Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Matthieu,

On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:58:43 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:

> Bupdles appeared in bzr 0.9, so no surprise ...
> 
> Either upgrade bzr (recommanded, right now, we're following the
> evolution of bzr, and not making efforts to support old versions), or
> apply the bundle with "patch".	

Thanks for the info. I upgraded to bzr 0.10, but now I get a different
error:

bzr: ERROR: Revision
{stefan <at> xsteve.at-20060808185426-ae46cc064e417ad9}
not present in inventory.

How can I fix this one?

Thanks
Neilen

--

-- 
you know its kind of tragic 
we live in the new world
but we've lost the magic
-- Battery 9 (www.battery9.co.za)

Re: [DVC] Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

[ Cc-ing bzr's ml : this might show a usability problem ]

Neilen Marais <nmarais <at> sun.ac.za> writes:

> Matthieu,
>
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:58:43 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
>> Bupdles appeared in bzr 0.9, so no surprise ...
>> 
>> Either upgrade bzr (recommanded, right now, we're following the
>> evolution of bzr, and not making efforts to support old versions), or
>> apply the bundle with "patch".	
>
> Thanks for the info. I upgraded to bzr 0.10, but now I get a different
> error:
>
> bzr: ERROR: Revision
> {stefan <at> xsteve.at-20060808185426-ae46cc064e417ad9}
> not present in inventory.
>
> How can I fix this one?

The bundle application needs to do exact patching (it's giving
delta-compressed representation of a revision based on another), you
can't apply it on a branch whose repository doesn't contain the base
revision.

In your case, I guess you need to "bzr pull" from Stefan before
applying the bundle.

Re: [DVC] Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

On  4 Sep 2006, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy <at> imag.fr> wrote:
> [ Cc-ing bzr's ml : this might show a usability problem ]

You're quite right, thanks for pointing it out:

  https://launchpad.net/products/bzr/+bug/58840

> On the bzr side, I wonder what could be made to make the error message
> more user-friendly. Perhaps an additional "maybe you need to pull or
> merge it" would help. At the moment, the error message is accurate and
> sufficient for someone who understood the bzr model, but not for
> beginners.

I agree.

Re: Re: Re: Some XEmacs compilation fixes

Neilen Marais <nmarais <at> sun.ac.za> writes:

> Matthieu,
>
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:58:43 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
>> Bupdles appeared in bzr 0.9, so no surprise ...
>> 
>> Either upgrade bzr (recommanded, right now, we're following the
>> evolution of bzr, and not making efforts to support old versions), or
>> apply the bundle with "patch".	
>
> Thanks for the info. I upgraded to bzr 0.10, but now I get a different
> error:
>
> bzr: ERROR: Revision
> {stefan <at> xsteve.at-20060808185426-ae46cc064e417ad9}
> not present in inventory.
>
> How can I fix this one?

Could someone send me the patch bundle from robert (gzipped). I'd like to apply it.

I have no working version, because my mail provider slightly changed
the versions I got until now 

A version downloaded from gmane doesn't work, because the email addresses are
changed in the text attachment. This makes bzr merge fail.

Stefan.