Mads Jensen | 3 Feb 09:10
Favicon

omicron

Hi,

Could you please add

    (?o "omicron" "Greek Lowercase" 959) ;; #X03BF

to latex.el between the xi and pi characters in LaTeX-math-default.
Thank you.
--

-- 
Med Venlig Hilsen / Kind Regards,
Mads Jensen
Rubinsteinsvej 31,st.th
DK-2450 Kbh. SV
Denmark
+45 6168 8518
"hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia": fear of long words ...

_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel <at> gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
David Kastrup | 3 Feb 09:15
Picon
Picon

Re: omicron

Mads Jensen <mje <at> inducks.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Could you please add
>
>     (?o "omicron" "Greek Lowercase" 959) ;; #X03BF
>
> to latex.el between the xi and pi characters in LaTeX-math-default.

TeX does not offer that letter.

--

-- 
David Kastrup
Jürgen Fenn | 7 Feb 00:10

Finally bringing AUCTeX into Gnu Emacs

I would like to draw your attention to this discussion on emacs-devel
on whether AUCTeX could finally be included in GNU Emacs. I would
appreciate if you please could take part in the discussion.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-01/msg00847.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-02/msg00004.html

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Jürgen.
Uwe Brauer | 7 Feb 11:50
Picon
Favicon

Re: Finally bringing AUCTeX into Gnu Emacs

>> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:44 +0100, Jürgen Fenn <schneeschmelze <at> googlemail.com> wrote:

   > I would like to draw your attention to this discussion on emacs-devel
   > on whether AUCTeX could finally be included in GNU Emacs. I would
   > appreciate if you please could take part in the discussion.

   > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-01/msg00847.html
   > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-02/msg00004.html

Thanks for your email.

As the pkg manager of Auctex for Xemacs
let me ask: would that imply/mean/  that Xemacs would not be
supported in the future?

Uwe Brauer 
Mads Jensen | 17 Feb 18:20
Favicon

New style files, and missing symbols

I hope you'll include some of these files.  They are pretty
straight-forward. The packages multirow and bigstrut are bundled
together with multicol.

I noticed that ltx-base.el misses "@ifclassloaded" (first argument is
documentclass name, the second is the then-clause, and the third
argument is the else-clause):
'("@ifclassloaded" "Name" t t)

I reported last year that listings.el misses this command definition:
'("lstloadlanguages" t)
in TeX-add-symbols, but it was never added.
--

-- 
Med Venlig Hilsen / Kind Regards,
Mads Jensen
Rubinsteinsvej 31,st.th
DK-2450 Kbh. SV
Denmark
+45 6168 8518
"hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia": fear of long words ...

Attachment (multirow.el): text/x-emacs-lisp, 1546 bytes
Attachment (epigraph.el): text/x-emacs-lisp, 1927 bytes
Attachment (bigstrut.el): text/x-emacs-lisp, 1501 bytes
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel <at> gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
(Continue reading)

Ben | 2 Mar 23:29
Picon

Re: TikZ support

Florêncio Neves <florencioneves <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have written a sketch of style file for the TikZ drawing package. If
> you find the functionality relevant and the code of acceptable
> quality, I will be happy to contribute it.
> 
> There are two things I don't know how to do: one is to implement a
> parser for TikZ's "subpackage" system, the other is how to make the
> current key-val functionality of AUCTeX work better with pgfkeys,
> which allows blank spaces in keys and values.
> 
> Best regards,
> Florêncio Neves.
> 
> Attachment (tikz.el): text/x-emacs-lisp, 7812 bytes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> auctex-devel mailing list
> auctex-devel <at> gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
> 

I've also worked some on support for TikZ in AUCTeX, but I think I've taken it
in a different direction than you have.  My code is available githib; there's a
screenshot, a link, and discussion of the code at
http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/30252/5277.  I was focused only on getting
precise syntax highlighting, rather than fitting in smoothly with AUCTeX's
(Continue reading)


Gmane