3 Jul 06:30
RE: Are e-mail discussion lists still relevant?
From: Nancy <nancy@...>
Subject: RE: Are e-mail discussion lists still relevant?
Newsgroups: gmane.education.web4lib
Date: 2009-07-03 04:30:31 GMT
Subject: RE: Are e-mail discussion lists still relevant?
Newsgroups: gmane.education.web4lib
Date: 2009-07-03 04:30:31 GMT
The two technologies with which I most engage in discussions are email lists and message boards. The lists give everyone's response an equal weight, which means I don't miss something valuable because it's not presented as enticingly as something posted by a greater wordsmith. Both email lists and message boards are easy to interact with, but some versions of each of these types of technologies are more user friendly than others. Nancy E. Sosna Bohm Associate Librarian Lake Forest College sosna@... > -----Original Message----- > From: web4lib-bounces@... > [mailto:web4lib-bounces@...] On Behalf Of K.G. Schneider > > If you are engaging with peers, colleagues, friends, family, etc. > (rather than simply having things "come to you"), then RSS is not quite > as effective. It may point you to ongoing conversations but you will > still have to use another tool to participate. > > I have found myself disengaging with RSS in some instances and going > back to email because it was a more effective tool. That even includes > some "read-only" behavior, such as commits for an open source project, > news flashes, etc. >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed