Ayse Dayi | 2 Mar 2009 15:10
Picon
Favicon

EVENT REMINDER: Saturday, March 2: Transnational Network Conversation on Feminist Movement in a Transnational Era

Center for Transnational Women’s Issues (ctwiei.ning.com) &

George Washington University’s Women In and Beyond the Global Project (www.womeninandbeyond.org)

invite you to the:

 

6th Saturday Conversation of the

TRANSNATIONAL NETWORK ON WOMEN'S ISSUES

 

Celebrating International Women’s Day with a Roundtable on:

 

Feminist Movement Building in a Transnational Era

 

Alejandra Bergemann, Program Associate, JASS Mesoamerica http://www.justassociates.org/

 

Cathy Eisenhower, Humanities Librarian, George Washington University

 

Emek Ergun, PhD Candidate, LLC Program

University of Maryland at Baltimore County & Turkish Translator of

“Virgin: The Untouched History”

 

Megan Foster, Vice President, the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance at GWU

http://studentorgs.gwu.edu/fmla

 

Saturday, March 7, 2009 10:30-12:00

 

Visit http://ctwiei.ning.com/group/tnwi to hear the podcast of our previous talks.

 

About the talk:  We will celebrate the International Women’s Day with a roundtable discussion on feminist movement building in a transnational era through open access projects, projects in U.S. and Latin America, and feminist translation.

 

Locations: This month’s meeting will be held at George Washington University Phillips Hall, Room 411, 801 22nd St, NW, and Towson University Cook Library 404A, Towson, MD 21252. If you would like to join us through phone, please email transfem-1JT3bMlxmMvYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org for the number and instructions.

 

About the Network: These are monthly teleconference meetings held on the first Saturdays of each month 10:30-12:00. In each meeting, we will have two presenters talk about a transnational/international women's issue, to learn about the issue and exchange perspectives and strategies on research, service provision, policy, and activism. We want to talk about issues such as women and education, politics, immigration, health, poverty, globalization and more.

 

 

Mission: Despite the fact there are many of us who are interested in and work on transnational women's issues as researchers, teachers, librarians, community organizers, service providers, activists, policy makers, journalists, and other professions, we seldom find opportunities to talk to each other, learn from each other, or work together. Our mission is to use technology to develop a sustainable community and network of feminist scholars, activists, community workers, and policy makers working on transnational women's issues, in order to promote transnational awareness of women's issues and develop context-appropriate strategies and actions to better women's lives. 

 

Contact us:  If you have further questions, please email us at transfem-bjfSEswcVnc@public.gmane.org

 

Center for Transnational Women’s Issues aims to promote transnational awareness of women's issues in the community at large through research, arts, education, advocacy, grassroots community work and activism.

 

Organized by the George Washington University's Women's Studies Program, Women In and Beyond the Global aims to break down barriers between academic and activist knowledge by fueling activist scholarship; encouraging collective reflection on feminist movement-building; and documenting and preserving these activities

through digital media.

 
 


***************************************
Ayse Dayi, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Women's Studies Department
Towson University
8000 York Rd.
Towson, MD
Email: adayi-y+eG6fpLLqU3uPMLIKxrzw@public.gmane.org
Phone: 410 704 5453
***************************************



Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Find out more.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Carolyn Pevey | 3 Mar 2009 00:45
Favicon

RE: Passing for white


Does anyone have the reference to a website with stories of people of color passing for white in the 1920s and
later?  I thought I'd had it bookmarked, but I'm not finding it now. 

Carolyn Pevey, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
*P.O. Box 244023
Auburn University Montgomery
Montgomery, AL  36124
cpevey@...
*the P.O. box is for United States Post Office mail.  If you are sending something any other way, please
contact me.

Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and should in no way be understood to represent
those of AUM, the School of Liberal Arts, or the Sociology Department.
___________________________
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Del Thomas Ph D | 3 Mar 2009 04:06
Picon

Re: Passing for white

I would be interested in the web site too.  I wonder if they include statements of those who pass  unawares like the Dean of the OSU law school who discovered
he was black when he  was  ten or eleven. 

Del

Carolyn Pevey wrote:
Does anyone have the reference to a website with stories of people of color passing for white in the 1920s and later? I thought I'd had it bookmarked, but I'm not finding it now. Carolyn Pevey, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Sociology *P.O. Box 244023 Auburn University Montgomery Montgomery, AL 36124 cpevey <at> aum.edu *the P.O. box is for United States Post Office mail. If you are sending something any other way, please contact me. Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and should in no way be understood to represent those of AUM, the School of Liberal Arts, or the Sociology Department. ___________________________ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.5/1979 - Release Date: 03/01/09 17:46:00

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

John Glass | 3 Mar 2009 16:44
Favicon

Passing for white

some can be found here:
 
 
john
 
John E. Glass, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Division of Social & Behavioral Science
Collin County Community College
Preston Ridge Campus
9700 Wade Boulevard
Frisco, TX 75035
+1-972-377-1622
http://iws.ccccd.edu/jglass/
jglass-AQbn+YCFnvWHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org
 
"I don't trust power, so I either want to be in it or get as close to it as I possibly can"

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Tiffani Everett | 4 Mar 2009 22:19
Picon

Reviewing for exams


Hi all. I would love to hear your suggestions or thoughts on reviewing
with students for an exam. What strategies have worked well? What
strategies have been a nightmare? Do you find reviewing to be helpful
for students or to be a waste of time? You can email me directly at
tiffani.everett@...

Tiffani
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Zachary Miner | 5 Mar 2009 15:10
Picon

Re: Reviewing for exams


Tiffani,

I've found that my students are very uneasy about the prospect of
preparing for exams on their own, with no formal review sheet or
review session. However, I don't think that review needs to be
extensive in order to be effective. I used to set aside an entire 50-
minute class period for review and for students to ask questions, but
it ended up feeling like a waste of time to me. One reason for this
was because students often didn't heed my request to show up with
questions they wanted to ask about the material - I think most of them
were just showing up to see if they could get hints about what will be
on the exam. Also, some students would use it as a way to get notes
for classes they missed - something which is better accomplished
during office hours.

So I've switched to carving out a short period of time at the end of a
regular class period (20 minutes, maybe) to remind students what the
format of the exam will be, how much of their grade it represents, how
much time they'll have to do it in, etc. The only major "hint" I give
about material is if I know for certain that I *won't* be putting a
major section of something we covered onto the exam. I do so because I
don't think it makes sense for students to spend a lot of time
studying something that I felt wasn't important enough to test them
on. I don't like to give other "hints" about exam material, though, if
only because I feel like everything we covered in class is fair game,
and students should be relatively well-versed in all of the material
we covered, not just a concept or two here and there.

So, if you want to save class time, I'd suggest giving a short review
sheet and telling students to contact you if they have additional
questions. If you want to do a longer in-class review, though, I'd
suggest setting aside a certain amount of time in the days before an
exam to go over a few things, but be aware that students may not have
anything they want to ask you about the material, and so you may have
to make some general points to fill up the time. (One example of this
might be to just go back through the chapter headings and remind them
of the major concepts you covered in each.) If that kind of a session
feels rushed the first time, you can think about expanding it a
little.

The only thing I do not recommend is out-of-class review sessions.
These often seem like a good idea, but many times students cannot show
up because of previous commitments, or whatnot, so it ends up
providing some students with an advantage over others. That isn't to
say that I would look down on someone who chooses to use such an
approach - I just choose not to use it myself.

- Zachary Miner
SUNY Albany

On Mar 4, 4:19 pm, Tiffani Everett <tiffani.ever...@...> wrote:
> Hi all. I would love to hear your suggestions or thoughts on reviewing
> with students for an exam. What strategies have worked well? What
> strategies have been a nightmare? Do you find reviewing to be helpful
> for students or to be a waste of time? You can email me directly at
> tiffani.ever...@...
>
> Tiffani
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Roberts, Keith | 5 Mar 2009 15:31
Picon
Favicon

Re: Reviewing for exams


I have actually gone entirely to either take-home exams (mostly) or sometimes in-class exams that are open
book and open notebook (which reduces "unproductive anxiety"--they still come very prepared).  If the
questions focus mostly on higher order thinking skills (analysis, synthesis, evaluation) or on
developing and supporting a thesis, then the examination becomes part of the learning process (akin to
what they do all the time in class) and the anxiety levels are reduced. I can absolutely tell how well they
have engaged the material and understand the core issues, and exams become less of a guessing game about
what to memorize.  I started doing this several years ago and find that it works much better, the students
retain the material better to the following term or year, and in creates a less contentious classroom
culture. I really like it, and so do the students.  Just a thought....

Keith

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Sarah Murray | 5 Mar 2009 15:44
Favicon

Re: Reviewing for exams


My exams in my on-line course are like Keith's.  Some of my colleagues give 
timed on-line exams that require memorization; I use all-essay tests that 
they have a full week to complete, which are "mini-research projects" -- all 
analysis and application of theory.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roberts, Keith" <robertsk@...>
To: "Teaching Sociology" <teachsoc@...>
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:31 AM
Subject: TEACHSOC: Re: Reviewing for exams

>
>
> I have actually gone entirely to either take-home exams (mostly) or 
> sometimes in-class exams that are open book and open notebook (which 
> reduces "unproductive anxiety"--they still come very prepared).  If the 
> questions focus mostly on higher order thinking skills (analysis, 
> synthesis, evaluation) or on developing and supporting a thesis, then the 
> examination becomes part of the learning process (akin to what they do all 
> the time in class) and the anxiety levels are reduced. I can absolutely 
> tell how well they have engaged the material and understand the core 
> issues, and exams become less of a guessing game about what to memorize. 
> I started doing this several years ago and find that it works much better, 
> the students retain the material better to the following term or year, and 
> in creates a less contentious classroom culture. I really like it, and so 
> do the students.  Just a thought....
>
> Keith
>
> > 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Robert J Hironimus-Wendt | 5 Mar 2009 15:48
Favicon

Re: Reviewing for exams

Hi All

 

At Western Illinois, we have an FYE program in place that allows each section a budget of $200.00. After trying a bunch of bonding type events, my peer mentors (upper division students with knowledge of the course) settled on using that money to buy pizza for study sessions. My peer mentors are the ones that conduct the study sessions, and they have suggested that the students who attend do better (or at least say they are doing better?). Most students do attend, and I have not really noticed much difference in the grades. On the other hand, is students define the situation as beneficial, then it is beneficial in some way, right?

 

As to my role in the study sessions, I used to provide the peer mentors with a study guide (which was also distributed to the students). For the past year and a half, I have been providing the peer mentors with an actual copy of the test prior to the study sessions. I have noticed two things with this approach. First, no one gets a perfect 100 on the tests, and second, the overall grades have not changed much that I can tell.

 

So from my perspective (i.e., do no harm and where possible do good), study sessions should be made available. At the very least, some students need help. Second, some need to feel like you are trying to help. Third, the Thomas Theorem tells us that the definition of the situation is important (and I have noticed my evaluations have gone up a lot of the past couple years). Fourth, my experience suggests using a tutor or peer mentor or underclass TA seems to be as effective as if I or a graduate student were to conduct the sessions. Fifth, it doesn't seem to matter what materials are used to lead the session, as long as there are relevant materials being used.

 

Finally, I would schedule study sessions around dinner time, buy pizza, and tell the kids to bring their own coke.

 

Peace to all,

 

Robert

Robert J. Hironimus-Wendt, Ph.D.
Sociology and Anthropology
Western Illinois University
1 University Circle
Macomb, IL 61455-1390
phone: (309) 298-1457
fax: (309) 298-1857
email: RJ-Hironimus-Wendt-Nunua0wMlGM@public.gmane.org

"You must surround your students with models of
  straightforward conduct, clarified character, and
  open reasonableness, for I believe it is in the hope
  of seeing such models that many serious people
  go to lectures rather than more conveniently
  reading books"  (C. Wright Mills [1954] 1963: 371-372).


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

John Glass | 5 Mar 2009 15:53
Favicon

urban - rural

I had a student ask me about if there are any differences in quality of life between urban and rural dwellers. i could not recall any studies on this, although i am sure they exist.
 
anyone point me in a direction?
 
thanks!
 
john
 
John E. Glass, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Division of Social & Behavioral Science
Collin County Community College
Preston Ridge Campus
9700 Wade Boulevard
Frisco, TX 75035
+1-972-377-1622
http://iws.ccccd.edu/jglass/
jglass-AQbn+YCFnvWHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org
 
"I don't trust power, so I either want to be in it or get as close to it as I possibly can"

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to teachsoc-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to teachsoc+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Gmane