1 Nov 2008 22:37
BMCR 2008.11.02: Polignac on Budin on Pironti
Bryn Mawr Classical Review <classrev <at> brynmawr.edu>
2008-11-01 21:37:16 GMT
2008-11-01 21:37:16 GMT
Polignac on Budin on Pironti. Response to 2008.08.45. Response by François de Polignac, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (polignac <at> ehess.fr) ------------------------------- To read a print-formatted version of this response or to comment on this response, see http://www.bmcreview.org/2008/11/20081102.html ------------------------------- Methodological issues in the study of Greek religion: a necessary mise au point. One may more or less disagree with a review and nevertheless abstain from reacting, leaving the debate open for other arenas. But some reviews raise so important methodological issues and reveal so deep a gap in a field of study that they require a comment. Such is the case of the recent review by Stephanie Budin of Gabriella Pironti's book, Entre ciel et guerre. Figures d'Aphrodite en Grèce ancienne (BMCR 2008.08.45). As a member of the jury who unanimously gave the highest appraisal to Pironti's doctoral dissertation and strongly advocated its immediate publication, I feel compelled to point out some problematic aspects of this review. One thing to consider is that, in her wish to break with the traditional interpretation of Aphrodite as the goddess of sweet love, easily associated in our minds with the pretty and slender Botticellian long- and fair-haired figure, Pironti may have gone a bit too far here and there or neglected some diverging evidence. Constructive remarks are welcome when the general idea and method of the demonstration are well understood. But the very first lines of the review reveal, on the contrary, a basic misunderstanding. The word "love" opens the review and occurs six more times in nine lines, while Aphrodite is mentioned only twice: would Pironti's book be a dissertation about "the ancient conceptions of love" (p. 1)? Certainly not; it is concerned with the goddess Aphrodite, in a way which does correspond to the soundest interpretations of ancient polytheisms. This means that Pironti does not want to enclose Aphrodite in any rigid category predetermined by our own representations and ways of thinking. Modern scholars have for long identified the ancient gods by one specific and static function,(Continue reading)
RSS Feed