Re: Port. In 300 field
Young Park asked when we include "port(s)." in a 300.
In my cataloging class, I was taught that a portrait is a picture of a real person or persons in which the
subject could be recognized or identified, even if he or she is not identified by name. I include
"port(s)." whenever I think the reader would be interested. Photos of celebrities in a celebrity
cookbook are clearly ports. Old photos in family histories are. A snapshot of the author on the last page of
a novel is not. Being that sort of person, I suspect that I would say "ports." for a book including the photos
of the winners of the Westminster Dog Show for the last 40 years, even without any people in the pictures.
The dogs would be individually identifiable. However, the hamsters in a how to raise hamsters book, or the
sketches of the fictional pets in Rita Mae Brown's mysteries, or Curious George's drawings are not
ports., as they are either not real or not individualized. Photos of models, however clear, while they
interact with the subject of the photo (as in "wheels are round. A cookie is round" with children holding
toy trucks and cookies) are not ports., as no one cares about the identity of the models, except maybe their
mothers. But a grainy photo of WWI soldiers in a bunker could be, even if they weren't named, as they are
important to the photo. Remember cataloger's judgment.
Incidentally, all forms of illustration, whether maps or ports. or facsims. or plans or unclassifiable,
are subsets of ill., and can be left at ill. if you prefer, although AACR2 says to identify the type if all of
one type: "|b maps."
Esther Mandel
Cataloger
Sarasota County Public Libraries
Sarasota, Florida, USA
emandel@...
***********************************************************************
AUTOCAT quoting guide: http://www.cwu.edu/~dcc/Autocat/copyright.html
E-mail AUTOCAT listowners: autocat-request@...
(Continue reading)