Re: Added entries for a DVD
"unless many or most of the acrobats were well-known on their own hooks, I can't see the point of tracing all
of them, let alone establishing each of their names. It seems >analogous to cataloging a DVD about one of
Boston's unmatchable, world-dominating (not that we're bragging, mind) sports teams (too numerous to
mention!) and giving >a.e.s to every Red Sox, Celtic, or Patriots player. Same goes for the "directors,
producers, choreographers" or other associated folk. The name of the troupe is, IMO, sufficient."
While I respect what Gordon posted on this topic, and the strategy he describes is in fact the strategy we
employ, I wonder why the individual acrobats are deemed any less important than the 4th through infinity
authors on a potential title page that some members of this list have proposed listing and tracing. I'm not
advocating tracing every blessed name on a t.p., but if that's a good idea, then why is tracing all the
acrobats, dancers, and other participants on a video program not also a good idea?
For our little shop the answer is that it would make the cataloging take far too long and result in very little
extra benefit to users. As the spouse of a nurse who often finds her name well down the list of contributors
on medical publications regardless of her relative input, I don't think that most patrons will be
searching on most of the added entries, but it seems that if it's good for one format it ought ot be just as
good for another.
Mike Tribby
Senior Cataloger
Quality Books Inc.
The Best of America's Independent Presses
mailto:mike.tribby@...
***********************************************************************
E-mail AUTOCAT listowners: autocat-request@...
Search AUTOCAT archives: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/autocat.html
Selected AUTOCAT commands: http://www.cwu.edu/~dcc/Autocat/options.html
(Continue reading)